Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

UNICHIP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07 January 2003, 02:16 PM
  #1  
wally
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
wally's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Any body used the piggyback computer from UNICHIP, I wanna hear some comments because a friend of me has one for sale, he says that its fully programmable and give a great result on a turbo car,like the Impreza ...
Old 07 January 2003, 02:34 PM
  #2  
what would scooby do
Scooby Senior
 
what would scooby do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 52 Festive Road
Posts: 28,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

the mapper is more important than the chip - but I would personally go for something better such as the Link. I was going to go for unichip meself last year, but am now going down link route, getting whole lot including knocklink,lambda link etc.
Old 07 January 2003, 03:54 PM
  #3  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Had one,ditched it for a Link.With the choices these days I think crude piggybacks are outdated
Old 07 January 2003, 06:28 PM
  #4  
EvilBevel
Scooby Regular
 
EvilBevel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Hi Deep []

Old 07 January 2003, 07:35 PM
  #5  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Whoooops!
Old 08 January 2003, 12:48 AM
  #6  
parso_rex
Scooby Newbie
 
parso_rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sydney AUSTRALIA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Very Brave comparing a Link with the standard ECU (with inputs modified by the Unichip) for every day drivability....I would actually call the Link item crude myself. Depends what you are after, maximum power at the expense of reduced off boost performance/economy or a happy medium of the two. Thats the real question. Not sure how far you can go with a Unichip powerwise ??

In defense of the Unichip it works very well and apart from offering the ability to allow easily attainable moderate power increases it also provides increased fuel economy just through simple fueling changes.You still have all the features of the OEM ECU which is pretty good. With the new loom available you don't even have to cut your wiring anymore to insert the Unichip.
All this relies on the fact that you have someone around to tune the setup of course. They are very common over here in OZ

Mark
Old 08 January 2003, 09:53 AM
  #7  
JamesS
Scooby Regular
 
JamesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Link = complete comtrol of all the various functions in the engine.

UNICHIP = OEM control of all the various functions EXCEPT fuel and spark which is where the performance gain comes from.


Trending Topics

Old 08 January 2003, 10:00 AM
  #8  
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
R19KET's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hmmmm, If you have a "re-mappable" ECU, and you're losing off boost performance, and fuel economy, I would suggest it's more likely to be due to the map, than the ECU.

Mark.
Old 08 January 2003, 12:21 PM
  #9  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Parso,simple fact is that over here we have someone who has been mapping the Link for over 4 years and has done over 100 cars.Alot of his cars have proven to produce good safe big power(with other mods of course) with everyday reliablity.Now we have a few other guys who are also extremely good aswell.As for the Unichip dealers(in UK,lol Theo!)I would'nt trust them to walk my dog
Old 08 January 2003, 01:16 PM
  #10  
JamesS
Scooby Regular
 
JamesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Powerstation, Clive Athowe tuning or Owen developments for UNICHIP......amongst others.....
Old 08 January 2003, 03:13 PM
  #11  
TBMeech
Scooby Regular
 
TBMeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Surrey Somewhere, From 341 bhp '99 STI V to '98 Merc CLK & '00 Peugeot 306 XSI to '01 E46 M3 :)
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hmmmm,

I dont quite understand this personally:

I would actually call the Link item crude myself
Its fully mappable, unlike Unichip so what does that make Unichip then?

I've had the Unichip and have currently got the Link setup in my MY99 STI-V.

The Unichip is far better in the idle area of the car, mapped by Powerstation, I didnt think the car felt any better than a friends STI-V.

However after a bit of homework and some help from a few peeps on here, PTHolt & Andy Tang I went for the Link (Cheers Tango ), i've had the Link mapped by Bob Rawle and the car is far stronger than before, acceleration, spool up time, peak boost, boost held etc, the car is a completely different animal to when I had the Unichip installed, I personally wouldnt go back to a Piggyback ECU, for not much more money i'd always go for a fully mappable ecu nowdays.

But there are others who swear by Unichips, so they are not imo pants, different people have different needs I guess
Old 08 January 2003, 03:32 PM
  #12  
EvilBevel
Scooby Regular
 
EvilBevel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

i've had the Link mapped by Bob Rawle and the car is far stronger than before
There must be a clue in there somewhere []

Anyway, for a MY99/00 car I'd say (IMHO etc) the Unichip is no longer a good option compared to EcuTek, and same goes for the WRX now.
Old 08 January 2003, 03:36 PM
  #13  
dowser
Scooby Senior
 
dowser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Any piece of hardware has optimal operational parameters. 99% of replacement ecu or piggy back devices are capable of getting pretty close to these parameters. Would that the same were true of all mappers Everything I read above is related to the mapper, not what was mapped....

Richard
Old 08 January 2003, 03:47 PM
  #14  
dominicm
Scooby Regular
 
dominicm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I am interested in the Link set up...what performance gains have you seen with the link set up? Is there less lag? How much boost are you know running, safely? Can you remap the link easily when you do further modifications?

Cheers
Dom.
Old 08 January 2003, 06:10 PM
  #15  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Toby,why WI and not fmic?
Old 08 January 2003, 07:18 PM
  #16  
dominicm
Scooby Regular
 
dominicm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

TBMeech,

Sounds exactly what I'm looking for, I work round the corner from BRD so I've better give them a call. Also am I right in thinking that 15psi = 1 bar?

Cheers
Dom.
Old 08 January 2003, 08:41 PM
  #17  
TBMeech
Scooby Regular
 
TBMeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Surrey Somewhere, From 341 bhp '99 STI V to '98 Merc CLK & '00 Peugeot 306 XSI to '01 E46 M3 :)
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Hi Deep

Budget really, am meant to be moving out lol, but I keep spanking too much wedge into the car, basically I got the WI at such a good price it was very hard to turn it down, At the end of the day I wish I could afford £1000 for a FMIC but I cant at the mo, tho I will be getting one this year sometime, I know when I put a fmic on the wi will compliment it very nicely.

Dom,

Not sure on the psi > bar conversion, If you can speak to Bob, he's a top bloke, most would agree
Old 08 January 2003, 10:12 PM
  #18  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks Toby.Dominic,I think its 14.7psi = 1bar=760MM/Hg =101kPa
Old 08 January 2003, 10:43 PM
  #19  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

14.5 PSI.
Old 08 January 2003, 11:11 PM
  #20  
Neanderthal
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northampton, Xbox GamerTag - Neanderthal1976
Posts: 6,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

I've got an MY97 and a friends just offered me his Unichip and EVC4 at a price I can't turn down. I've read all these comments I'm now a little nervous

He had it on an MY99 company car (changed jobs - car went, mods came off etc). Made a big difference from a standard set up on his car so I'm hoping to notice the same on mine.

From all the comments made here and on the threads I've managed to find in the search I've come to the conclusion that it's not that the Unichip is bad, it's just there's better out there. Is that right?
Old 09 January 2003, 08:41 AM
  #21  
EvilBevel
Scooby Regular
 
EvilBevel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Just to be clear: I think most people are trying to say that it's not so much about the hardware: it's the experience of the mapper.

I had some very good results with the Unichip, others have had nightmares.

You may want to check if the MY99 Unichip fits a MY97 model, I'm not sure it does. If it does, *please* have it remapped for your car, your mods etc, or you are really asking for trouble. This is a must.

So you have to recalculate the price of the "deal" adding the mapping session.

You also may want to check if it comes with the auxiliary boost solenoid driver. If not, add the price of a Dawes to the package.
Old 09 January 2003, 01:17 PM
  #22  
Neanderthal
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northampton, Xbox GamerTag - Neanderthal1976
Posts: 6,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Thanks for the concern Evil. I should have said that I knew I was going to need it remapped for mine. I've already spoken to Power Station who've quoted me 300+vat to fit & map it.
It's also coming with one of those auxiliary boost solenoid controllers as well.
Old 09 January 2003, 01:51 PM
  #23  
Rich Curtis
Scooby Regular
 
Rich Curtis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Neandethal,
I've had a unichip on my UK97 for almost a year now with no problems.

I bought mine secondhand and had it fitted by powerstation together with a Dawes set to around 18PSI.

With a full decat I got 240PSI & 240 ft/lbs of torque, just over what most PPP conversions do at powerstation (checkout their dyno link for examples of what mods give what power on what cars).

If your getting one for a good price go for it - unless your going for major power boost which will need other costly mods(e.g. turbo, FMIC) IMHO I doubt you would get much benefit from a link setup for the additional cost.

Rich
Old 09 January 2003, 04:20 PM
  #24  
hrubago
Scooby Regular
 
hrubago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Prague
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I have Unichip on STi 3 and power 308 bhp before PE Exhaust manifold installed. Sounds like 321 bhp from LINK :-)
Old 09 January 2003, 05:55 PM
  #25  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

JB yes I meant 14.5,mistype.
Old 09 January 2003, 05:59 PM
  #26  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Neanderthal.I have had a Link,a Unichip and an Ecutek.IMHO I'd steer clear of the Unichip because there is so much better out there in terms of hardware.The best Scoobymappers out there ie Bob Rawle etc use Link and Ecutek but would'nt touch a Unichip.I think that says something.D'ont do it just to save a few hundred quid its not worth it.I been there,seen it and have a whole wardrobe of T-shirts.
Old 09 January 2003, 08:22 PM
  #27  
Neanderthal
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northampton, Xbox GamerTag - Neanderthal1976
Posts: 6,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Deep, too late mate already brought it. Hindsight's a beautiful thing. I understand what your on about though. All I can say is it performed really well on his car (262bhp & 276 torque) so I snapped it up before someone else did.
Old 10 January 2003, 06:40 AM
  #28  
dowser
Scooby Senior
 
dowser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The fact does remain that I'd also expect to see better results running circa 1.2bar, but that maybe the rolling road. However, boost tailing off to .7 bar after 5k is more conservative than Subaru which wont help your torque curve.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking it - it sounds safe, which is good. And you can always remap later

Richard
Old 10 January 2003, 06:27 PM
  #29  
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
johnfelstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Received 53 Likes on 30 Posts
Thumbs down

cut that crap out guys! [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img] You know what i mean!

OK, onwards with the thread.
Old 10 January 2003, 06:28 PM
  #30  
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
johnfelstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Received 53 Likes on 30 Posts
Wink

good way to take a corner, i'll have to remember that one

In Case your confused, i just deleted about 10 posts from this thread. Lets keep it civil in here please.


Quick Reply: UNICHIP



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.