Injector flow rates and remap : - (
#1
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Anyone ever flow checked a "380" injector from a 95 RA ???? I suspect that they flow quite a bit more Either that or my new 550's are not 550's !!!!
Ran with my new 550's and remap for the first time today, initially promising when the torque built at 4000 and all 4 spun in 4th !! but things went downhill after this
Knocklink went crazy, AFR was 13.5 at WOT, I got severe det anything over 4k as the AFR dropped off to 14.5 Coming off/on throttle I got fuel cut ???? EH ?? I have a FCD
Open loop idle was 15.5 and cruise was a somewhat lean 17.8
Tried the 550's on the standard map and it started ok, Idle AFR rich at 11.5, open loop cruise 12.5, WOT 4k 11.2 and WOT 6k 11.8 and pulling very well for 1.5 bar........until, fuel cut ?
I disconnected the MAP pressure line and tried again. It would lean out and stumble as soon as I went +ve boost I thought the MAP sensor was only used for boost control ??
Lots of confusing messages here, have not quite worked it out yet.
Appears that my new injectors are only about 16% bigger than my old ones ? So either my new ones are only 440's or, my old original grey ones were 470's ??????
Very strange......
I'm off for a drink !
Ran with my new 550's and remap for the first time today, initially promising when the torque built at 4000 and all 4 spun in 4th !! but things went downhill after this
Knocklink went crazy, AFR was 13.5 at WOT, I got severe det anything over 4k as the AFR dropped off to 14.5 Coming off/on throttle I got fuel cut ???? EH ?? I have a FCD
Open loop idle was 15.5 and cruise was a somewhat lean 17.8
Tried the 550's on the standard map and it started ok, Idle AFR rich at 11.5, open loop cruise 12.5, WOT 4k 11.2 and WOT 6k 11.8 and pulling very well for 1.5 bar........until, fuel cut ?
I disconnected the MAP pressure line and tried again. It would lean out and stumble as soon as I went +ve boost I thought the MAP sensor was only used for boost control ??
Lots of confusing messages here, have not quite worked it out yet.
Appears that my new injectors are only about 16% bigger than my old ones ? So either my new ones are only 440's or, my old original grey ones were 470's ??????
Very strange......
I'm off for a drink !
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Um, you're confusing me now! For starters I thought the MAP sensor only sense boost an is used for the overboost cut! And now you're running leaner on 550s when compared to 380s? Was it the standard injector in your car?
#3
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
No, not leaner, just not much richer. AFR measured via wideband, run 1 was with fuel remap to suit 550's, run 2 was with the original fuel map but still using the 550 injectors.
See, told you it was confusing !!!
See, told you it was confusing !!!
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're now stressing me out and I'm supposed to be on holiday! In theory, you would've thought that it'll run richer wouldn't it? Looks like its time for you to fiddle with the excel program for this christmas, remapping everything. Then pass it to me as I was thinking of getting 550s myself.
#6
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
It's the same map that David Wallis used sucessfully with his 550's
I suspect the RA ECU is doing things a bit differently ??? Using MAP as well as MAF for fueling ???
I suspect the RA ECU is doing things a bit differently ??? Using MAP as well as MAF for fueling ???
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh cr*p, I've blocked out the whole signal from my MAP sensor with my FCD! I better check it out tommorrow morning before doing my daily overtaking thing. No wonder the CEL comes on once in a while..
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We have a similar model WRX RA right? Not the STI RA. Are you sure your CEL wasn't on? Thats what happened to mine when I removed it (okay bad connection as I was too lazy to solder it) and it refused to go on boost, giving an overboost like effect. It happened even though the light went out so this could be it?
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As usual you lost me in the technobably.......BUT:
THAT, I like Hope you get it sorted out Andy
initially promising when the torque built at 4000 and all 4 spun in 4th
#12
Interesting....I had a boost-cut/fuel-cut type event which (for various reasons) I believe was triggered by water getting on the MAF, meaning rubbish MAF reading at that point in time.
car has FCD as you say....I was wondering if a WOT MAP signal, not within a certain range of the MAF signal, triggers a fuel-cut saftey.
Another thread I picked up earlier mentions fuel-cut with a knackered MAF sensor.......but its MAP based surely......
car has FCD as you say....I was wondering if a WOT MAP signal, not within a certain range of the MAF signal, triggers a fuel-cut saftey.
Another thread I picked up earlier mentions fuel-cut with a knackered MAF sensor.......but its MAP based surely......
#13
it's feesable, but would be airflow, and therefore HP related.
I would be surprised if andy is suddenly getting 400hp at 4000rpm.
Maxing out the maf sensor is possible though.
I'll have to work with andy on this. What he describes is nothing like the experiences of David Wallis' car, so very different I think there is something fundamentally odd.
ECU should be fine, as the new eproms replace no only the mapping info, but the software code too.
Paul
I would be surprised if andy is suddenly getting 400hp at 4000rpm.
Maxing out the maf sensor is possible though.
I'll have to work with andy on this. What he describes is nothing like the experiences of David Wallis' car, so very different I think there is something fundamentally odd.
ECU should be fine, as the new eproms replace no only the mapping info, but the software code too.
Paul
#14
I had a problem with the remap in my 94 RA when using the original ECU (W9).When ever the boost got over 1 bar/1.1bar i would hit fuelcut even though cut was set higher in the remap. I have switched to a Z4 ecu now with the same remap and it is fine, I don't really know the tecnicalities of it all so have a word with Scott T as he sorted most of it for me.
Scott
Scott
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RA Jaay... LOL
OI, Who Said you could use my old map???
Eh.
Eitherway mine ran fine apart from a bit of det and idle problems due to the iscv... I know this is stupid but no fault codes I take it?
Your not running 7th injector anymore?
MAF constant?? Due to front entry?
what base fuel pressure you running, I was running a webber escort cossie fuel pressure reg. 1:1 or 1.1:1 ??
I would like to see this sorted, so let me know either way as I want your map when its done
I can lend you my box to download the map if necessary..
Paul / Andy keep me informed please
David
[Edited by David_Wallis - 12/14/2002 11:20:59 AM]
OI, Who Said you could use my old map???
Eh.
Eitherway mine ran fine apart from a bit of det and idle problems due to the iscv... I know this is stupid but no fault codes I take it?
Your not running 7th injector anymore?
MAF constant?? Due to front entry?
what base fuel pressure you running, I was running a webber escort cossie fuel pressure reg. 1:1 or 1.1:1 ??
I would like to see this sorted, so let me know either way as I want your map when its done
I can lend you my box to download the map if necessary..
Paul / Andy keep me informed please
David
[Edited by David_Wallis - 12/14/2002 11:20:59 AM]
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RA Jaay, David, you talking to me? I'm confused here as I too am an Andy.
edit: yeah i've got the uprated fuel pump.
[Edited by Katana - 12/14/2002 9:11:43 AM]
edit: yeah i've got the uprated fuel pump.
[Edited by Katana - 12/14/2002 9:11:43 AM]
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
didnt scott think this was down to the regulation on the map sensor supply line and getting a non linear response from the map sensor??
#21
While we are havng all this talk of RA's has anyone got a definitive answer for the 5th Injector? Does it work or not???? I assume mine currently isn't as i am using a Z4 ecu from 95 wrx.
Scott
Scott
#22
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Paul - Your Email didn't arrive until this morning ! I'll call this evening if that's suitable ? Didn't want to call this morning in case you'd been up all night with more important things !!
Andy, better call me Andyf then ! Yes I have an uprated pump and regulator.
I'm not sure if it was exactly the same map as yours David ? I think Paul used the same fuel constant to adjust for the bigger injectors..........guess only paul knows that !
I have a few chipsets with it to try out, as I have a rising rate regulator which makes mapping 'interesting', Paul flashed a set with Baseline, -5% , -8% and -10% fuel. I initially fitted the -5% (call it an uneducated guess ) I was in the 14 - 15 AFR range on power I then fitted the baseline chips and got the results posted above. Slightly richer but still approx 18% weak.
The 5th injector does nothing....ever ! I checked this with the wideband, injector unplugged gave me exactly the same results.
Injectors 6&7 were worth approx 10% extra fuel and were only required over 1.5 bar boost.
This all leads me to believe that my original injectors were bigger than 380cc ??
Also, this fuel cut with a FCD is a bit strange ? MAF limit ???
Andy, better call me Andyf then ! Yes I have an uprated pump and regulator.
I'm not sure if it was exactly the same map as yours David ? I think Paul used the same fuel constant to adjust for the bigger injectors..........guess only paul knows that !
I have a few chipsets with it to try out, as I have a rising rate regulator which makes mapping 'interesting', Paul flashed a set with Baseline, -5% , -8% and -10% fuel. I initially fitted the -5% (call it an uneducated guess ) I was in the 14 - 15 AFR range on power I then fitted the baseline chips and got the results posted above. Slightly richer but still approx 18% weak.
The 5th injector does nothing....ever ! I checked this with the wideband, injector unplugged gave me exactly the same results.
Injectors 6&7 were worth approx 10% extra fuel and were only required over 1.5 bar boost.
This all leads me to believe that my original injectors were bigger than 380cc ??
Also, this fuel cut with a FCD is a bit strange ? MAF limit ???
#23
I think I might have screwed up regarding the fuel cut, but nothing a slight adjustment of the FCD wouldn't fix for now. I forgot we had a different MAF sensor on David's so the boost limit might appear to be low.
Is the 5th injector still plumbed in?
What if the injector was normally on? Unlikely, but you can see what I'm getting at.
Still using that rising rate jobbie? I wonder if the larger injectors will have a bearing on maintaining fuel pressure.
Have you checked the fuel pressure to make sure?
I can't see that RAs would have bigger injectors, as Scott.T has put an off the shelf map into an RA, and no problems were encountered, it would have run rich as hell otherwise.
You can phone me anytime today (saturday).
Cheers
Paul
Is the 5th injector still plumbed in?
What if the injector was normally on? Unlikely, but you can see what I'm getting at.
Still using that rising rate jobbie? I wonder if the larger injectors will have a bearing on maintaining fuel pressure.
Have you checked the fuel pressure to make sure?
I can't see that RAs would have bigger injectors, as Scott.T has put an off the shelf map into an RA, and no problems were encountered, it would have run rich as hell otherwise.
You can phone me anytime today (saturday).
Cheers
Paul
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hedgecutter
General Technical
3
25 September 2015 02:35 PM