Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Charge cooler or FMIC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19 June 2002, 12:10 PM
  #1  
Markus
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Markus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

another one of those thinking about thinking about threads.

OK, which would be better a charge cooler or a FMIC??

what options are available for CC's on an impreza? i know a few people have taken the CC bits from a subaru liberty (US version of legacy?) but are there other CC kits from imprezas?

Just wondering the advantages/disadvantages of both systems.

Old 19 June 2002, 12:55 PM
  #2  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

UK legacy has charge cooler... GavinP has one... andy f has made his own and may even part with it if you offer him the right price... I May be able to offer fabrication services soon.. (need to fund a welder somehow.... hows £1600 for labour sound )

David
Old 19 June 2002, 01:09 PM
  #3  
Dizzy
Scooby Regular
 
Dizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Cosie Convert did one on his (o I'll just do a search for it ) and did a rolling road before and after and showed some impressive gains in his RA. I'm sure he'll respond
Old 19 June 2002, 01:12 PM
  #4  
Jolly Green Monster 2
Scooby Regular
 
Jolly Green Monster 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Markus,

I have been considering better cooling... just removed the bonnet vent covers...

Been thinking about adding water spray.. but the standard TMIC is so small that maybe a replacement might be better?

Anyway BTW... I looked into a CC for my MR2 turbo I had before the Scooby.. and the main reason for going for a CC was because with the engine in the back you couldn't get enough air onto an Intercooler. The best method there was to fit an intercooler on the roof... which looked pants..
So I think in short you'd be better fitting a FMIC... as there is enough room and you have lots of fresh air hitting it then.
A CC is only as cool as the water in it etc.. a FMIC with water spray must be the coolest intake available? Although I suppose a CC could be put in the TMIC position and would therefore not increase the air intake air journey to the inlet from the filter.

I'll be sticking with my cheap DIY Water spray if I get around to visiting a scrappy for a water bottle etc... for the moment anyway

JGM
Old 19 June 2002, 01:30 PM
  #5  
Richard Olafsson
Scooby Regular
 
Richard Olafsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I've just finished fitting one in my car, on a MY97 engine so I had to sort out the BOV too. It was a fairly cheap thing to do (about £150) although I can't quantify the improvements yet.
Can't get into the BBS how to page so can't post a pic, but there are loads on my website, http://www.ricola.co.uk

It was particularly useful for me as I don't get much airflow at the back of the car. People will always argue over which is best but from what I have rear there are the following arguments:

Air/water has larger heatsink so more easily absorbs spikes
-has more direct path from turbo to air inlet
-better for normal driving where not on constant full throttle

Air/Air is lighter
-simpler, less things to go wrong
-longer intake length so more pressure loss
-better for sustained boost as more direct heat transfer

My 2p worth...

Rich

Old 20 June 2002, 01:49 AM
  #6  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

I made a charge cooler system and it has given good results.

Dyno'd at 349bhp / 343lb-ft on std ECU, injectors and turbo, it certainly wasn't holding it back too much !!

Whether or not a FMIC would improve things further remains to be seen. For Fast Road, Sprint, Drag race and Dyno days the charge cooler is fine. For circuit use over an extended period (say 8+ laps) then a FMIC is probably superior.

All IMHO
Old 20 June 2002, 01:52 AM
  #7  
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
David_Wallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

but we all know andy knows **** all s dont listen!!...



David

Trending Topics

Old 20 June 2002, 01:58 AM
  #8  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wink

Old 20 June 2002, 09:02 AM
  #9  
Dizzy
Scooby Regular
 
Dizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

ahh poor cossie

btw did you manage to get the water tank fitted properly or is it still on the back seat
Old 20 June 2002, 10:23 AM
  #10  
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
R19KET's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Comparing power results from IC's/CC's on a rolling road, is VERY misleading.

"Most" of the gains seen, are not "gains", but just a lesser loss, due to the poor suitablity of RR fans to supply air to a TMIC.

You will see intake temps with a TMIC, on a RR, that you will NEVER see on the road. A well designed CC works well, but ultimately will also warm up, and the efficiency will deteriate. While a FMIC will be the most consistant.

Mark.
Old 20 June 2002, 11:24 AM
  #11  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Yes, I've got a nice BIG full width radiator for the charge water cooling. The most I have seen is a 5 deg C rise in water temperature, this was after 5 X 1/4 mile drag runs back to back.
Sitting with the fans on for 5 minutes dropped the temp back to ambient. A TMIC would just have got even hotter under these conditions.

Agree with Mark that FMIC is ultimately superior regards temperature control however you do have all that extra volume of pipework etc which, in my experience, takes the sharpness out of the throttle response.

Andy
Old 20 June 2002, 01:01 PM
  #12  
GavinP
Scooby Regular
 
GavinP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Lot of good points made already...

Bear in mind, it is possible to put together a decent chargecooler system for £500 or less which is considerably cheaper than any front mounted ICs I have seen.

How many times are you going to ask this question, Markus ?

Thanks

Gavin


[Edited by GavinP - 6/20/2002 1:02:44 PM]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
wrxcook
ScoobyNet General
3
29 September 2015 09:17 PM
lozgti1
Non Scooby Related
8
28 September 2015 03:49 AM
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
0
27 September 2015 11:21 AM



Quick Reply: Charge cooler or FMIC?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 AM.