ATA RAID controller
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've just recently acquired a rather nice computer (thanks Matt) - an abit KT7-RAID motherboard........... with a Barracuda ATA III HD --> are there huge advantages linking this with the RAID ATA controller ????? .....and how easy is it using win 98SE ?
Thanks,
Gastro
Thanks,
Gastro
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I knew I could rely on good old scoobynet !
Didnt go down to London Suba - just a mutual meeting place .........
Thats all the info I need to know - thanks - very happy with the performance already & this saved me many hours of work - THANK YOU
Gastro
Didnt go down to London Suba - just a mutual meeting place .........
Thats all the info I need to know - thanks - very happy with the performance already & this saved me many hours of work - THANK YOU
Gastro
#5
ok, here a quickie low down on RAID (based on two HDD in array)...
you can have RAID 0 or 1.
raid 0 - known as striping, so the data is distrubuted evenly between all the HDD in the array. in theory, you should get higher performance and you get the full capacity of your HDD. so striping two 40Gb HDD will get you a single 80Gb capacity. there's no safety net in raid 0 coz the HDD is like one big volume, so if one HDD goes, you lose your data.
raid 1 - known as mirroring, so if one HDD fail, the other one take over, so your data is not lost. raid 1 is better for reliability and not for performance. since the data is written into both HDD, two 40Gb HDD will get you 40Gb capacity.
you can have RAID 0 or 1.
raid 0 - known as striping, so the data is distrubuted evenly between all the HDD in the array. in theory, you should get higher performance and you get the full capacity of your HDD. so striping two 40Gb HDD will get you a single 80Gb capacity. there's no safety net in raid 0 coz the HDD is like one big volume, so if one HDD goes, you lose your data.
raid 1 - known as mirroring, so if one HDD fail, the other one take over, so your data is not lost. raid 1 is better for reliability and not for performance. since the data is written into both HDD, two 40Gb HDD will get you 40Gb capacity.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lurkin Somewhere
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im gonna use the striped array [0]
For example if you had a 1000mb file! it'd write 500mb to [0] and 500mb[1] hard drive
But in order for it to work the RPM n size has to be indentical iwas going to run to 40gb 5400rpm but instead ive bought 1 7200 till i can afford to buy n identical drive! much faster then
Si
For example if you had a 1000mb file! it'd write 500mb to [0] and 500mb[1] hard drive
But in order for it to work the RPM n size has to be indentical iwas going to run to 40gb 5400rpm but instead ive bought 1 7200 till i can afford to buy n identical drive! much faster then
Si
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM