SAN best practices
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lovely Lancing in West Sussex
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SAN best practices
Has anyone seen any best practices for configuring a SAN? Are there any recommended standards regarding LUN assignment and clustering groups?
Mostly for vSphere and SQL but a few other Microsoft bits as well.
Darren
Mostly for vSphere and SQL but a few other Microsoft bits as well.
Darren
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
I assume you will be running Vsphere on server hardware with HBA cards and fibre channel SAN storage?
I am by no means an expert in this area, but have been doing some work with our EMC corporate SAN in this area recently.
Need more detail on the SQL databases - specifically around transactions, ie volume of inserts / updates against reads or deletions.
I am by no means an expert in this area, but have been doing some work with our EMC corporate SAN in this area recently.
Need more detail on the SQL databases - specifically around transactions, ie volume of inserts / updates against reads or deletions.
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lovely Lancing in West Sussex
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Tarmac,
I've managed to get some Best practices from Dell\EMC. Yes, vsphere on three servers all connected via HBA 4GB to Fibre SAN in Multiple Raid5 arrays.
I've got not idea about the SQL figures yet, no one is talking about it yet, it's a few months off currently.
Darren
I've managed to get some Best practices from Dell\EMC. Yes, vsphere on three servers all connected via HBA 4GB to Fibre SAN in Multiple Raid5 arrays.
I've got not idea about the SQL figures yet, no one is talking about it yet, it's a few months off currently.
Darren
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lovely Lancing in West Sussex
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My main question is regarding LUN assignment. If you have 6 Disks in a RAID5 (not my choice or RAID) is it better to have a single LUN for the entire data or multiple smaller LUNS?
Currently they have been built as 400GB Lun's but I am not sure if we should have one LUN of 1.7TB and the VM servers uses that bigger volume.
That reason I ask is because the way it's been built means we lose space at the end of each LUN. Currently the LUNS are 400GB and all our VM Servers are 140GB. 400GB minus two servers at 140GB means we are left with 120GB. We can't use this curently.
They are all in the same Storage Group and we will be running Vmotion etc.
Darren
Currently they have been built as 400GB Lun's but I am not sure if we should have one LUN of 1.7TB and the VM servers uses that bigger volume.
That reason I ask is because the way it's been built means we lose space at the end of each LUN. Currently the LUNS are 400GB and all our VM Servers are 140GB. 400GB minus two servers at 140GB means we are left with 120GB. We can't use this curently.
They are all in the same Storage Group and we will be running Vmotion etc.
Darren
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Uncle Creepy
Other Marques
43
27 December 2015 04:02 PM
trapper2013
ScoobyNet General
6
30 October 2015 03:10 PM