802.11n upgrades, 5100/5300 Intel, Homehub 2
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
802.11n upgrades, 5100/5300 Intel, Homehub 2
Have a BT Homehub 2, and I am unclear on a few issues re its wireless-n.
My laptop has 945GM chipset and PCIe 802.11g full height card. It seems that I can install a 5100 or 5300 Intel card (not half height) into it, but the laptop only has two antennae.
Questions:
Can I get 150 or 300 mbps connection by selecting the right card and just using the laptop's two existing antennae with a BT Homehub 2?
If I still have some 802.11g devices on the network, will the speed be lower on the 802.11n laptop?
My laptop has 945GM chipset and PCIe 802.11g full height card. It seems that I can install a 5100 or 5300 Intel card (not half height) into it, but the laptop only has two antennae.
Questions:
Can I get 150 or 300 mbps connection by selecting the right card and just using the laptop's two existing antennae with a BT Homehub 2?
If I still have some 802.11g devices on the network, will the speed be lower on the 802.11n laptop?
#2
Both 5100 and 5300 support 2 streams only so a 2 antenna won't impede on the performance. Right now there are no chipsets to cater for a 3 stream setup (450Mbps), so a 3x3 antenna only helps on range.
The chipsets are similar; the difference is the 5300 has additional features such as EAP, WiFi PIN support. The latter will be useful while no doubt you won't use EAP.
I would avoid 150Mbps wireless-n lite. It is not actually wireless-n. It is 802.11g Super-G 108Mbps tweaked and rebadged. There are some wireless-n 150Mbps with actual wireless-n chipsets but they are fairly rare because its cheaper for the manufactures to use 802.11g chipsets.
802.11g devices on a wireless-n network will impact performance (not range though). However the biggest impact on performance is by not running wireless-n with WPA2 encryption. WPA or WEP encryption has a 20-30% performance penalty the last time I did some testing.
The chipsets are similar; the difference is the 5300 has additional features such as EAP, WiFi PIN support. The latter will be useful while no doubt you won't use EAP.
I would avoid 150Mbps wireless-n lite. It is not actually wireless-n. It is 802.11g Super-G 108Mbps tweaked and rebadged. There are some wireless-n 150Mbps with actual wireless-n chipsets but they are fairly rare because its cheaper for the manufactures to use 802.11g chipsets.
802.11g devices on a wireless-n network will impact performance (not range though). However the biggest impact on performance is by not running wireless-n with WPA2 encryption. WPA or WEP encryption has a 20-30% performance penalty the last time I did some testing.
Last edited by RoadrunnerV2; 25 November 2009 at 06:07 PM.
#3
That is interesting as i have just been given a wireless-n router and my laptop wireless-g can only get a sustained throughput of around 20mbps
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
gazzawrx
Non Car Related Items For sale
13
17 October 2015 06:51 PM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM