Hard Drive question - RAID
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Hard Drive question - RAID
I currently have a 140 and 250 GB hard drive.
I'm planning to get 2 500GB HDs and put them in RAID 1. I'm thinking that they will be storage with a back up (RAID 1) for all my photos and movie files.
I'm then wondering what if anything to do with the 140 and 250 I have. I'm thinking of keeping the 250 in place and putting Windows (XP for another year for me) and my games on that.
Will only using the 250 for games and loading windows make the machine faster?
All just stuff everything onto the 2 500s?
I'm planning to get 2 500GB HDs and put them in RAID 1. I'm thinking that they will be storage with a back up (RAID 1) for all my photos and movie files.
I'm then wondering what if anything to do with the 140 and 250 I have. I'm thinking of keeping the 250 in place and putting Windows (XP for another year for me) and my games on that.
Will only using the 250 for games and loading windows make the machine faster?
All just stuff everything onto the 2 500s?
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RAID1 may give a performance benefit when reading.
The density on larger capacity drives and therefore the transfer rate tends to be higher.
RAID1 will not protect your data if both drives fail simultaneously - such as a power supply fault.
I choose to run RAID0 on 2 x 500GB in my gaming machine for performance with backups between the wife's computer and my laptop. A wired connection is quickest compared with wi-fi. Depending on how much data you have why not use the 250+140 as backups, possibly external?
The density on larger capacity drives and therefore the transfer rate tends to be higher.
RAID1 will not protect your data if both drives fail simultaneously - such as a power supply fault.
I choose to run RAID0 on 2 x 500GB in my gaming machine for performance with backups between the wife's computer and my laptop. A wired connection is quickest compared with wi-fi. Depending on how much data you have why not use the 250+140 as backups, possibly external?
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
raid0 = Striped. Data spread over the two disks. Faster (than Raid5 & 1), no redundancy. One disk fail - lose the lot.
Raid1 = Mirrored. Data mirrored over two or more disks. Slow. Good redundancy. Loss of lots of storage space.
Raid1 = Mirrored. Data mirrored over two or more disks. Slow. Good redundancy. Loss of lots of storage space.
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Only thing that puts me off RAID0 is if one goes the lots gone. I was thinking of RAID1 so at least if one fails the information is still stored on the other.
By the time I fill up 500GB, I'll get 2 1TB drives.
By the time I fill up 500GB, I'll get 2 1TB drives.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I wouldn't trust RAID1 with my data without a backup anyway for the reason I mentioned that a power supply fault or a small fire could kill both drives.
So for a system you can power down to repair, what is the advantage against the loss of storage and performance?
XP is just silly fast off RAID0
So for a system you can power down to repair, what is the advantage against the loss of storage and performance?
XP is just silly fast off RAID0
Last edited by john banks; 25 March 2008 at 06:57 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Lesson 1: Raid is NOT a backup solution
But, having redundancy in for your data is not a bad thing. I would certainly prefer it to RAID 0...unless I was a serious gamer i suppose...in which case I'd have an xBox360/PS3!!
But, having redundancy in for your data is not a bad thing. I would certainly prefer it to RAID 0...unless I was a serious gamer i suppose...in which case I'd have an xBox360/PS3!!
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
So if I have a RAID1 setup and one fails, how do I retrieve the information from the functioning HD?
I'll be the first to admit I don't know a huge amount about this sort of thing but I can set them up etc. It just that since tinkering with PCs etc the main failures I've had have all been with hard drives.
I can't bare the thought of losing all my **** you see
I'll be the first to admit I don't know a huge amount about this sort of thing but I can set them up etc. It just that since tinkering with PCs etc the main failures I've had have all been with hard drives.
I can't bare the thought of losing all my **** you see
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Intel® Matrix Storage Manager - Degraded or failed RAID 1 Volume
This is how it is done with my chipset.
This is how it is done with my chipset.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've done it the ****-about-tit method on my home PC:
Hardware RAID 0 on two 250gig discs...As a boot drive OS and general programs, and anything current at hand (downloaded/recorded video, working data etc)
Third non-RAID 250gig drive (my old hard disk) retaining its original MBR and OS install and basic programs installed (but not acessible). And critical data backed up on to it weekly (in addition to DVD backups for irreplacable data)). This is the fail-safe/emergency hard disk.
Should the RAID array fail, I just set the old 3rd drive back as the boot drive and I have a working computer with useable functionality and the critical data is still backed up on there.
The theory is a bit like a half arsed RAID 1+0, but I don't have space for 4 drives (HTPC case).
The only issue I have is keeping the unused drive quiet when not in use. Not as easy as I initially thought
Hardware RAID 0 on two 250gig discs...As a boot drive OS and general programs, and anything current at hand (downloaded/recorded video, working data etc)
Third non-RAID 250gig drive (my old hard disk) retaining its original MBR and OS install and basic programs installed (but not acessible). And critical data backed up on to it weekly (in addition to DVD backups for irreplacable data)). This is the fail-safe/emergency hard disk.
Should the RAID array fail, I just set the old 3rd drive back as the boot drive and I have a working computer with useable functionality and the critical data is still backed up on there.
The theory is a bit like a half arsed RAID 1+0, but I don't have space for 4 drives (HTPC case).
The only issue I have is keeping the unused drive quiet when not in use. Not as easy as I initially thought
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
I do a similar version except drive three isn't bootable - but still has all the data. Which is also duplicated on another machine. Didn't see the point in making it bootable because I'm used to rebuilding Windows - usually a useful opportunity to leave behind all the cr*p which has built up since the last install.
M
M
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Well ok, RAID1 isn't a back up facility but at least it gives you a chance to save your information if a HD fails.
What would be a better back up solution?
What would be a better back up solution?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aaron_ions
General Technical
17
03 November 2021 11:07 AM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
55
05 August 2018 07:02 AM