S0dding IBM hard drives!
#1
Apologies - I'm going to have a bit of a rant...
I've just had my second IBM hard drive fail on me. It's an ultra-160 SCSI drive, running in my main desktop PC. I had one fail on me a couple of years ago and it was replaced. Fair enough - these things happen. Unfortunate, but forgivable. Now it's replacement has failed. That's the last IBM hard drive that I buy!
Yes, everything important was backed up but that's not the point. If you value your data, do not buy IBM hard drives.
So - can anyone recommend a decent ultra-160 HDD? I'd like the drive to be as quiet as possible, and it doesn't have to be huge; 18Gb is fine.
I've just had my second IBM hard drive fail on me. It's an ultra-160 SCSI drive, running in my main desktop PC. I had one fail on me a couple of years ago and it was replaced. Fair enough - these things happen. Unfortunate, but forgivable. Now it's replacement has failed. That's the last IBM hard drive that I buy!
Yes, everything important was backed up but that's not the point. If you value your data, do not buy IBM hard drives.
So - can anyone recommend a decent ultra-160 HDD? I'd like the drive to be as quiet as possible, and it doesn't have to be huge; 18Gb is fine.
#3
My younger brother has had a Deskstar fail on him. These were Ultrastars, which I thought would be more reliable. They're intended for hardcore server use. How can anyone expect them to be used 24*7 in a critical server when I've had two fail in a desktop PC?
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We ( big German company that sponsers Real Madrid ) run nothing but Seagate drives and although it does happen they dont seem to die very often. Also found them quiter than most so might be a good choice for a desktop. I think they do a line of Cheetah drives that are around 18 gigs.
[Edited by swaussie - 8/25/2003 5:15:11 PM]
[Edited by swaussie - 8/25/2003 5:15:11 PM]
#5
Yeah... I use IDE Barracudas for 'data' drives in my desktops, and I really like them. For IDEs they're pretty fast, and very quiet as well. Are you referring to IDE or SCSI Barracudas?
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah can definately recommend them as its what I use in my PC at home as well (ultra320). I find them actually very quite for the performance they give, but are obviously louder than an IDE. It depends if you need quite or performance.
#9
I'm used to the noise that the IBM drive made (past tense, awful piece of cr@p... ), which I believe was quite agricultural in comparison. I bet the Seagate SCSI drives are quite a bit quieter. It would be nice if they were as quiet as the Seagate IDE (Barracuda) drives, but I know that's not realistic!
#10
Perhaps this is a daft question...? I have an Adaptec 29160 Ultra160 controller. Since most drives are now U320, can I assume that they're all backwards compatible? i.e. that they'll run at U160 speeds on my controller.
You know... I'm very tempted to ditch this SCSI lark. It's a pain in the @ss when drives fail and I'm sorely tempted to go for a couple of RAID-1 IDE Barracudas just for the security of it! Or, perhaps IBM have just tainted my view of SCSI drives...
You know... I'm very tempted to ditch this SCSI lark. It's a pain in the @ss when drives fail and I'm sorely tempted to go for a couple of RAID-1 IDE Barracudas just for the security of it! Or, perhaps IBM have just tainted my view of SCSI drives...
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think they are backwards compatible but why would you spend extra money buying a drive that can move 320MB per second when its running at 160MB per second? It would be like never taking your Scooby out of second gear And yes I think you have had a bad run with the IBM drives because every major datacentre in the world runs SCSI for two reasons: its speed and reliability. It is majorly more expensive for these reasons.
[Edited by swaussie - 8/25/2003 5:47:10 PM]
[Edited by swaussie - 8/25/2003 5:47:10 PM]
#15
You can be plain unluckly with HDs.
I have a server in Telehouse in London. It reported being a 18GB HD down (RAID 1 mirror). Got HP to send out a new one. Day later, the new drive is reporting as being down. Try it in a different hot swap bay, nope.
So the swap out drive gets swapped and it's been fine since. Touch wood!
I've got servers running three year old 9GB IBM SCSI HDs and they've run 24/7 since installation with no hassles at all.
I have a server in Telehouse in London. It reported being a 18GB HD down (RAID 1 mirror). Got HP to send out a new one. Day later, the new drive is reporting as being down. Try it in a different hot swap bay, nope.
So the swap out drive gets swapped and it's been fine since. Touch wood!
I've got servers running three year old 9GB IBM SCSI HDs and they've run 24/7 since installation with no hassles at all.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gazzawrx
Non Car Related Items For sale
13
17 October 2015 06:51 PM