Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

Cable Modem Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 July 2002, 11:39 AM
  #1  
darlodge
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
darlodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lovely Lancing in West Sussex
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Chris,

I have setup the 600k NTL cable modem via a RP114 router. It allows 4 machine out at once and it was so simple to set up. Just plug in the router connect all 4 machines and set each machine to obtain an IP address from NTL's DHCP range. I bought my router from Insight for about £55. They have since dropped to £50.99 and this includes 2 free NIC's.

I have only had one problem in 2 months and that was related to a power spike. I forgot to backup the config of the router and it lost all its settings as a result. 5 minutes later after I worked out what had happened I was back in business.

Also I have Cisco remote access to my office and this still works fine. It just sits in the tray and I wait for 'that call'.

Hope this helps

Darren

[Edited by darlodge - 12/7/2002 11:40:31 AM]
Old 06 December 2002, 04:29 PM
  #2  
Chris L
Scooby Regular
 
Chris L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MY00,MY01,RX-8, Alfa 147 & Focus ST :-)
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

I'm on NTL's cable modem service (640K one) - very good - great performance etc..

I'm looking at ways to link up a few PC's at home and share the line. Now I know I could do this by turning my W2K PC into a DHCP server and allocating addresses etc, but I was wondering if anyone had achieved the same thing by attaching a cable router (Linksys BEFSR41 for instance) via the Ethernet port of the cable modem and using the router to hide the PCs behind it using NAT?

The only reason I'm looking to do this is so that I can hook up my work laptop using an IPSec session back to the office and the company should pick up the cost of any new equipment needed.

Any thoughts or comments appreciated.

Chris
Old 06 December 2002, 04:45 PM
  #3  
Fig
Scooby Regular
 
Fig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: not forgetting 20,000 posts from last time ;)
Posts: 5,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yes can be done.

Connect the WAN side of the router to the cable modem, then plug
your PCs into the LAN side. The router acts as a DHCP server, allocating IPs to the PCs Dynamically and uses NAT to deliver the goods.

I used a Netgear Router with built in Wireless Access Point and connected two desktop PCs via CAT5 cable and my laptop using a wireless LAN card.

Most Cable Modems now accept at least 2 MAC addresses and you just need to cycle the power to the CM after switching to the router, but you may need to unplug the CM from the mains and the NTL cable for a few hours so that it forgets the MAC address of the currently connected PC and accepts that of the router instead.

Under NTLs acceptable use policy, you are permitted to connect up to 3 PCs.

Don't know about your IPSec requirements, but presume this can be done too.


Old 06 December 2002, 06:18 PM
  #4  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Post

That's my setup. I have NTL cable modem to Linksys BEFSR41, then 2 PC's, my XBox and Playstation hooked up. NTL have provided me with a hub for the XBox trial so at the weekend I'll be trying Cable Modem to Hub to Xbox and Router then from the Router to my PC's. Aparently I have two IP address's due to the Xbox Trial.
Old 06 December 2002, 06:22 PM
  #5  
super_si
Scooby Regular
 
super_si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lurkin Somewhere
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

DO NOT GET IT!!!

It died on me after 2 months the **** thing!!

Amazon replaced it and i got my cash back.

Bought Netgear Rp114

Si
Old 06 December 2002, 07:20 PM
  #6  
IanW
Scooby Regular
 
IanW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Si,

You might have just got a defective unit
Old 07 December 2002, 08:43 AM
  #7  
Chris L
Scooby Regular
 
Chris L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MY00,MY01,RX-8, Alfa 147 & Focus ST :-)
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Thanks guys - couldn't see any reason why it wouldn't work - just nice to check if anyone else had done the same thing.

As regards IPSec - I know this will work as I have another session setup with a Cisco VPN client for accessing a customer's network.

Cheers
Chris

Trending Topics

Old 07 December 2002, 12:21 PM
  #8  
Fig
Scooby Regular
 
Fig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: not forgetting 20,000 posts from last time ;)
Posts: 5,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Correction to what Darlodge says, you set the PCs to get their IP addresses automatically, but it is the router - not NTL that issues them.

I've gone for static IP addressing, as I have port forwarding set up for one machine and wanted to ensure that this machine always had the same IP address.
Old 07 December 2002, 02:15 PM
  #9  
darlodge
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
darlodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lovely Lancing in West Sussex
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Cheers Fig, I always thought that it was NTl that supplied them. Either way. It works a treat for me

Darren
Old 07 December 2002, 02:58 PM
  #10  
Fig
Scooby Regular
 
Fig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: not forgetting 20,000 posts from last time ;)
Posts: 5,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Its a 2 stage transaction. The WAN side of the router gets its IP address from NTL. The LAN side of the router acts as DHCP server, allocating IPs to the PCs (usually in the range 192.168.0.x) and providing the NAT translation.

As you say, it works, which is the main thing
Old 07 December 2002, 03:51 PM
  #11  
HHxx
Scooby Regular
 
HHxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Chris, remember that vpn is against NTL's T&C, you run the risk of being shut down....

H
Old 07 December 2002, 04:31 PM
  #12  
darlodge
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
darlodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lovely Lancing in West Sussex
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think that hosting a VPN is against NTL's T & C's. I don't think that being a client of a VPN is against any rules. I might be wrong though

Darren
Old 07 December 2002, 06:28 PM
  #13  
Iain Young
Scooby Regular
 
Iain Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Well, I've got an Actiontec wireless cable router connected to my NTL line. Got two PCs hooked off the ethernet, and my laptop via the wireless connection. Works a treat.

I also use it to vpn into work from time to time, and have had no problems...

Iain
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM
Raptorman
ScoobyNet General
0
01 October 2015 06:46 PM
B0DSKI
Non Car Related Items For sale
2
27 September 2015 06:58 PM



Quick Reply: Cable Modem Question



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 AM.