Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

fmic or tmic on 2.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 09:24 PM
  #1  
Scott@ScoobySpares's Avatar
Scott@ScoobySpares
Thread Starter
Formerly ScoobyTeknix
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
From: Fleetwood, Lancashire
Default fmic or tmic on 2.5

running my 1998 with a semi forged 2.5 (forged pistons/version 9 rods), sti 3/4 heads, vf43 from a rb320, 740cc injector with parallel lines and FPR, full de-cat,

small bit of advice as i am struggling to find a good branded / good fitting large front mount intercooler ideally HKS. Was toying with the ideal of just slapping on an sti 7/8/9 topmount intercooler with a few modifications of course to make it fit

so what would be better sti 7/8/9 topmount or frontmount intercooler looking for 400 over 400

thanks scottn
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 09:39 PM
  #2  
EngineMapper @ Group B Motorsport's Avatar
EngineMapper @ Group B Motorsport
Engine Specialist
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 554
Likes: 1
From: Wrexham, North Wales
Default

Hybrid intercoolers are about the best value for money you can buy. Harvey sells them.

Graham
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 10:25 PM
  #3  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
Default

As above Hybrid FMIC are great value for money



Jura
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 11:00 AM
  #4  
eclipse performance's Avatar
eclipse performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Sunderland
Default

A larger top mount will be better in my opinion. Your not running a massive turbo so there's no need to go the FMIC route and introduce the inherent lag issues.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 11:07 AM
  #5  
birchy2010's Avatar
birchy2010
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 0
From: West Midlands
Default

I'm 400 plus on my sti top mount. if i had neth and fmic i'd be near 500 though :-(
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 12:59 PM
  #6  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

Bez is running a 2.5 @ 487 bhp on a huge top mount, but it would make 50 bhp more with a decent FMIC, IMHO.

dunx
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 01:02 PM
  #7  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by eclipse performance
A larger top mount will be better in my opinion. Your not running a massive turbo so there's no need to go the FMIC route and introduce the inherent lag issues.

what lag? Afriad this is a setup issue not a trait of front mounts.

as far as what to go for, Harveys seem to be abotu the best value for money out there at the min.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 01:06 PM
  #8  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

From what I know (unless you can get a Newage TMIC cheap), the difference between the two is not that great price wise. if you went for a Hybrid, it would be more or less fit and forget and the kit will fit. The OE Newage TMIC won't "just" fit as far as I'm aware and will need some "tender loving care". You would need the Newage hose and I suspect need to make some form of changes to the scoob on your Classic.

Compare the costs and stress and make your own mind up.

If you were ever to consider going more power in the future (over 400bhp), then the argument becomes a tad one sided with the FMIC being a better solution imo.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 01:11 PM
  #9  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by eclipse performance
A larger top mount will be better in my opinion. Your not running a massive turbo so there's no need to go the FMIC route and introduce the inherent lag issues.
In my view lag is marginal with FMIC,if its mapped properly.



Jura
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 01:34 PM
  #10  
Baz82's Avatar
Baz82
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Dublin,Ireland
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
In my view lag is marginal with FMIC,if its mapped properly.



Jura
Id agree with that
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 02:27 PM
  #11  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

The biggest cause of lag is a poor selection of headers, uppipe or mapper. An efficient tube and fin FMIC with low pressure drop will not appreciably cause any lag. An inefficient bar and plate core or badly designed pipework can induce lag and other problems.
From my experience and that of many people above, your choice is obvious but I am biased. However my honest advice is get a Hybrid FMIC kit. Best value for money in terms of performance and value.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 03:52 PM
  #12  
Scott@ScoobySpares's Avatar
Scott@ScoobySpares
Thread Starter
Formerly ScoobyTeknix
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
From: Fleetwood, Lancashire
Default

all solved now been pulled over to the fmic side lol also changing turbo fitting a VF 22 instead of the VF43 which i have spun for shorter pipe work as thats the only fmic pipe work we have on shelf so spun the turbo to match lol for less chance of lag

thanks every one for the advice
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM
sedge69
Wanted
0
Oct 1, 2015 09:44 PM
Ned Han
General Technical
0
Sep 29, 2015 09:35 PM
hedgecutter
ScoobyNet General
4
Sep 25, 2015 11:42 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 AM.