Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

What boost? TD05/06

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #1  
GBruce's Avatar
GBruce
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Thumbs up What boost? TD05/06

Hi,

I have asked this question on here before but need to be sure on this because I will be having the car mapped soon,

Standard uk engine with all the supporting mods, what do you think will be best?

1.4 bar to redline?
1.4 bar to about 6500 then to 1.3?

I have read that the ideal boost for this turbo is about 1.65 in the midrange dropping to 1.45 at the top, should I really push it and try this or is it a recipie for disaster? What is the ideal boost to run?

If the engine did let go I would be planning a super strong rebuild so should I just go for the optimum setting and hope it lasts as long as possible? Would save on remapping costs.

Thanks in advance


George
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 06:10 PM
  #2  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

I had no problem running my std UK engine at 1.4 bar to 7000rpm.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 08:08 PM
  #3  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by AlanG
I had no problem running my std UK engine at 1.4 bar to 7000rpm.
mmmmmm 1.4bar
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 09:37 PM
  #4  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

The key thing to running this turbo and keeping the engine in one piece is the exhaust manifold IMHO. The gains are considerable at this level and you don't need to run silly boost so it spares octane hunger and your engine I reckon.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #5  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
The key thing to running this turbo and keeping the engine in one piece is the exhaust manifold IMHO. The gains are considerable at this level and you don't need to run silly boost so it spares octane hunger and your engine I reckon.
which manifold do you recommend
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #6  
EMS's Avatar
EMS
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
which manifold do you recommend
I have seen lots of different manifolds on customers cars, the best allround performance against a good price gives the GT-Spec GenII manifold. You could have a tad more midrange torque with some of the true equal length manifolds, but always with some loss of top end. The GT-Spec GenII has a spool up only a bit worse compared to standard, with increased torque and top-end performance.

Mark.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 05:41 PM
  #7  
GBruce's Avatar
GBruce
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

Hello,

I have the version 2 Gruppe-s manifold on with a 2" h+s up pipe (No leaks yet, touch wood)

On my last run on the dyno with the TD04 peak power was said to be at 6300 rpm, will this change with the bigger turbo on? If it doesn't, is there any point in having all that boost above this point.

If you are a mapper and was going to map my car (98UK) and everything was working correctly and there are no problems what boost would you map in?

550 injectors
FSE Pump/Reg
APS FMIC
TD05/06
Original SS exhaust inc up pipe, no cats
Gruppe-s headers

Anyone gone higher than 1.4 bar on standard engine internals with or without failure?
Is it better to run more throughout the midrange to give more torque?

Alan,

Seen your car in the recent issue of jap performance, looks good :-)
The write up says you run 1.5/1.6 bar is that engine standard?

Will the 550cc injectors be enough?

Thanks

George
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 06:58 PM
  #8  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

Hi George, yes the engine is std, no internal mods done at all, only bolt on bits.

I also had the Gruppe-S manifold and up-pipe on the car when i ran 1.4 bar. The up-pipe was a large bore non slip-jointed type (early manifold).

Peak power on my set up moved from approx 6400rpm to 6800rpm when the headers were fitted.

I used 740 injectors at this power level, not 100% sure about running 550's, though possible with a higher fuel pressure i believe. Perhaps other 05/06 users can clarify what's best.

John Banks ran higher boost pressure than 1.4 bar on his std 2.0 but this was with the std headers (albeit ported?). Putting the aftermarket headers on gave similar power but was better for the engine because you didn't need to run so much boost to achieve it.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 09:22 PM
  #9  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

As Alan has said, if you run std headers then you will need around 1.6 bar to make the same power as you would with 1.4 on headers.

I know you shouldn't compare different rolling roads but my 95 WRX on Std internals and Sti pistons made 432bhp at 1.65 bar at Well Lane on ported std headers.Then made 440bhp at 1.45 bar at Star Performance on Gruppe-S headers.

1.4-1.45 bar is the 'sweet spot' for this turbo on headers, any more boost and you can improve midrange torque but top end power can drop off due to backpressure build up in the exhaust.

Both runs were using Optimax plus octane booster on 550cc injectors and increased fuel pressure.

Andy
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #10  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

but top end power can drop off due to backpressure build up in the exhaust.

pleased im changing my exhaust to BLITZ then
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 08:47 AM
  #11  
AndrewC's Avatar
AndrewC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
pleased im changing my exhaust to BLITZ then
I would have thought the biggest restriction would be the TD05 exhaust housing.

Andrew...
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #12  
CustomScoobyIOM's Avatar
CustomScoobyIOM
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 0
From: Oooooooop North!
Default

I would have thought the biggest restriction would be the TD05 exhaust housing
But he is running a TD05/06 20g......
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 10:50 AM
  #13  
AndrewC's Avatar
AndrewC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

Exactly, big compressor small exhaust housing.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #14  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Yes it is the exhaust housing/turbine that limits output to circa 415 on Optimax or 440 with octane booster.

Andy
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #15  
RRE's Avatar
RRE
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Copenhagen
Default

When you guys talk about standard internals, is it then always the STI engines or is it also the "normal" GT Turbo engines?

Thanks

Rasmus
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #16  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Either.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #17  
RRE's Avatar
RRE
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Copenhagen
Default

How different are the 99 STI to the 99 GT internals? Is it only cylinder heads or is it also crank, pistons and rods?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 03:26 PM
  #18  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Heads and pistons.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 04:00 PM
  #19  
RRE's Avatar
RRE
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Copenhagen
Default

So the weak main bearings would be just the same issue on the STI as on the GT?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 04:44 PM
  #20  
GBruce's Avatar
GBruce
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

Thanks for the help everyone,

Do you recommend holding the 1.4/1.45 boost right to about 6800 rpm then, this would be easier to map wouldn't it?

George
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 04:51 PM
  #21  
XNWRX's Avatar
XNWRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Default

Yes, but wait for the remap before applying 1.45 up to the red-line ;-)
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 05:25 PM
  #22  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

I ran 1.4 bar to 7000rpm then tailed off after that.

Because the revs rose very quickly in gear, i set my rev limit to 7500rpm, this was because the Link ecu i had in at the time was bringing the limiter in to play before i had reached 7000rpm, but this was only in 2nd and 3rd. The Link seemed to sense the rate of acceleration (revs) and so stopped the engine from going bananas before it got to the set limit. IYSWIM.

The other problem i had was because the car accelerated really well in 2nd and 3rd, i tended to go in to the 7200-7300rpm bracket before changing gear ( I couldn't watch the road and the rev counter at the same time). In 4th and 5th, the revs didn't go up quite so quickly, so you had a bit more time on your hands to get a grip on what was going on and get a feel on when to change gear.
With the std headers you can feel the power tailing off after 6500rpm, so you instinctively change gear but with peak power at 6800rpm, you tend to change up that bit later. This is where i feel the 8000rpm limit of the Sti engines would be nicer.

Last edited by AlanG; Jun 24, 2004 at 05:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 06:20 PM
  #23  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

The real question is:

Does your wallet have uprated internals?

Paul
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2004 | 06:03 PM
  #24  
GBruce's Avatar
GBruce
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Cool

LOL, There seems to be a problem with my wallet, it has a big hole in the internals, It has been getting worse since I bought the car a couple of years ago!!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM
psport
Subaru Parts
3
Oct 4, 2015 07:35 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
mistermexican
General Technical
2
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
tjapplejuice
Drivetrain
9
Sep 25, 2015 03:46 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 AM.