Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

WRX RUNNING COSTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #1  
Dick Dastardly's Avatar
Dick Dastardly
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Post

;D Am collecting new WRX on Thursday and have read quite a few comments re expensive running costs. What in particular are they?

Either way it won't put me off, it's just a need to know thing! Have just px'd a cooper s and that was positively evil on tyres.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 09:58 PM
  #2  
stevoWRX's Avatar
stevoWRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Post

Petrol ,

since you'll just want to drive and drive and drive ...

Reply
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 10:07 PM
  #3  
Ajax's Avatar
Ajax
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
From: Oxon
Post

If you owned a Ferrari you would not worry about the fuel insurance and tyres, you would just enjoy your car.

Scoobys are a little bit like that.

So to recap, if you can afford it have it, if you can’t don’t.

Better still have two cars, an old van/car and a Scooby, use the old one for general day to day stuff and the Scooby for driving, this helps with the Optimax cost and worry of getting it pinched or damaged.

Petrol is the single worst problem, otherwise a reliable car.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 10:13 PM
  #4  
Toonman1's Avatar
Toonman1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Post

It's an expensive car to run against, say a Ford Fiesta. Compared with other cars that will hit 60 in less than 5.5 secs, pull 140mph+, do 30-70 in significantly less than 6 secs and offer excellent 4WD handling and grip - it's not.

I made the mistake of trading my 3rd Impreza Turbo for a new Seat Leon Cupra. Insurance (for me) was £6.00 per month cheaper, fuel costs reduced by only £30 per month (15K pa) and a 10K service was £6.00 cheaper than a WRX. Oh and tyre wear was much greater than any Scoob I've owned. Result? I traded for a new 02 WRX PPP after 9 months. It's certainly worth the extra £36 or so per month on running costs.

Cheers
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 10:55 PM
  #5  
Dick Dastardly's Avatar
Dick Dastardly
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Post

Know what you mean. The Cooper S was quite thirsty anyway, and looking at the spec in the current imprezza brochure the wrx is quite a bit better on consumption . The tyres were knack'd after 4.5k so am used to forking out for those.

Is the optimax essential? Was reading earlier about not running brilliantly on ordinary UL. As you may have gathered dealer hasn't mentioned any of this - hence the questions.

At the end of the day it won't make any difference to the enjoying the car, but its always nice to have a bit of info in advance.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #6  
wrxmania's Avatar
wrxmania
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 0
From: 1994 WRX STI VERSION 1 No. 21/200
Post

Optimax really is needed - inside the petrol flap it says 98RON Unleaded only on my UK 2003 WRX. There is tons of info about fuel and the new models here on the Scoobynet. Browse away.

Running costs are O.K. - on an average 80.0p per litre of Optimax, I get around 250 miles per £30 (less if I enjoy it more). Most I have got so far is around 275 miles for £30. All these figures include slow work, fast roads, crawling traffic etc so are a fair reflection. The enjoyment of driving it means I would pay £1.80 per litre for Optimax to drive it.

The ECU retards the ignition timing I believe if you use standard unleaded. It takes tons of refills for it to reset itself (that is what it does). Some folk say only 2-3 fill-ups but everywhere else says lots more than that.

Other than that, enjoy it - get a new exhaust pronto - the one on it is granny friendly.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 11:19 PM
  #7  
Dick Dastardly's Avatar
Dick Dastardly
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Post

Testdrove WRX with PPP on it, very impressed, so think when have got a bit more cash in new year will stick that on it.

Thanks for the info.

Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 01:11 AM
  #8  
Toonman1's Avatar
Toonman1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Post

On the one occasion I had to use 95UL (on holiday in the Highlands - no Optimax and hardly any SUL), it did take 3 tankfulls before the performance was back again. That's almost 800 miles, so it's bad enough.

Cheers
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
34
Nov 7, 2024 04:10 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
Dec 14, 2015 08:16 AM
Ciaran
Non Scooby Related
3
Sep 19, 2015 09:31 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 PM.