When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yep they just seem to get slower and fatter. If we were to judge Subaru's against the old survival of the fittest evolution rule, I think the Scoobs would be as extinct as the dinosaurs.
STi8 is quoted as both 5.5 and 5.2 to 60 on the Subaru website/info (5.5 in the brochure bit and 5.2 under the PPP info),with the PPP version doing it in 4.6, which is also quoted by Autocar.
these are in fact the same as quoted by Subaru for the STi7 - both weigh the same, same power and gearboxes etc, so this would ssem to be right.
I've just bought an sti7, and I can't quite get to 60 in 2nd. Having owned a my02+ppp previously, I think that these 0-60 and 0-100 times as quoted aren't entirely accurate.
The impression I get is that STi7 owners are losing money hand over fist in depreciation now that the new style 8 is out, plus the purchase price is a grand less so how you going to get your £1,600 back when you sell.
I can't see how you'll ever *add* value to a car by fitting a PPP, perhaps you may get 50% of your outlay back when you sell it but never more IMHO.
Got an 8 and yeah it's a nice car but not enough grin factor for me, so px'd it for a P1
let me get this right you had an STI 8 but didnt like and part exchanged for a P1?
you must have more money than sense m8. how much did you lose on that if it is not to impertinent a question? and new STI 8 with PPP is pushin out 305BHP, how much of a grin factor do you want/need?