Charge cooler or FMIC?
another one of those thinking about thinking about threads.
OK, which would be better a charge cooler or a FMIC??
what options are available for CC's on an impreza? i know a few people have taken the CC bits from a subaru liberty (US version of legacy?) but are there other CC kits from imprezas?
Just wondering the advantages/disadvantages of both systems.
OK, which would be better a charge cooler or a FMIC??
what options are available for CC's on an impreza? i know a few people have taken the CC bits from a subaru liberty (US version of legacy?) but are there other CC kits from imprezas?
Just wondering the advantages/disadvantages of both systems.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
UK legacy has charge cooler... GavinP has one... andy f has made his own and may even part with it if you offer him the right price... I May be able to offer fabrication services soon.. (need to fund a welder somehow.... hows £1600 for labour sound
)
David
)David
Markus,
I have been considering better cooling... just removed the bonnet vent covers...
Been thinking about adding water spray.. but the standard TMIC is so small that maybe a replacement might be better?
Anyway BTW... I looked into a CC for my MR2 turbo I had before the Scooby.. and the main reason for going for a CC was because with the engine in the back you couldn't get enough air onto an Intercooler. The best method there was to fit an intercooler on the roof... which looked pants..
So I think in short you'd be better fitting a FMIC... as there is enough room and you have lots of fresh air hitting it then.
A CC is only as cool as the water in it etc.. a FMIC with water spray must be the coolest intake available? Although I suppose a CC could be put in the TMIC position and would therefore not increase the air intake air journey to the inlet from the filter.
I'll be sticking with my cheap DIY Water spray if I get around to visiting a scrappy for a water bottle etc... for the moment anyway
JGM
I have been considering better cooling... just removed the bonnet vent covers...
Been thinking about adding water spray.. but the standard TMIC is so small that maybe a replacement might be better?
Anyway BTW... I looked into a CC for my MR2 turbo I had before the Scooby.. and the main reason for going for a CC was because with the engine in the back you couldn't get enough air onto an Intercooler. The best method there was to fit an intercooler on the roof... which looked pants..

So I think in short you'd be better fitting a FMIC... as there is enough room and you have lots of fresh air hitting it then.
A CC is only as cool as the water in it etc.. a FMIC with water spray must be the coolest intake available? Although I suppose a CC could be put in the TMIC position and would therefore not increase the air intake air journey to the inlet from the filter.
I'll be sticking with my cheap DIY Water spray if I get around to visiting a scrappy for a water bottle etc... for the moment anyway

JGM
I've just finished fitting one in my car, on a MY97 engine so I had to sort out the BOV too. It was a fairly cheap thing to do (about £150) although I can't quantify the improvements yet.
Can't get into the BBS how to page so can't post a pic, but there are loads on my website, http://www.ricola.co.uk
It was particularly useful for me as I don't get much airflow at the back of the car. People will always argue over which is best but from what I have rear there are the following arguments:
Air/water has larger heatsink so more easily absorbs spikes
-has more direct path from turbo to air inlet
-better for normal driving where not on constant full throttle
Air/Air is lighter
-simpler, less things to go wrong
-longer intake length so more pressure loss
-better for sustained boost as more direct heat transfer
My 2p worth...
Rich
Can't get into the BBS how to page so can't post a pic, but there are loads on my website, http://www.ricola.co.uk
It was particularly useful for me as I don't get much airflow at the back of the car. People will always argue over which is best but from what I have rear there are the following arguments:
Air/water has larger heatsink so more easily absorbs spikes
-has more direct path from turbo to air inlet
-better for normal driving where not on constant full throttle
Air/Air is lighter
-simpler, less things to go wrong
-longer intake length so more pressure loss
-better for sustained boost as more direct heat transfer
My 2p worth...
Rich
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
I made a charge cooler system and it has given good results.
Dyno'd at 349bhp / 343lb-ft on std ECU, injectors and turbo, it certainly wasn't holding it back too much !!
Whether or not a FMIC would improve things further remains to be seen. For Fast Road, Sprint, Drag race and Dyno days the charge cooler is fine. For circuit use over an extended period (say 8+ laps) then a FMIC is probably superior.
All IMHO
Dyno'd at 349bhp / 343lb-ft on std ECU, injectors and turbo, it certainly wasn't holding it back too much !!
Whether or not a FMIC would improve things further remains to be seen. For Fast Road, Sprint, Drag race and Dyno days the charge cooler is fine. For circuit use over an extended period (say 8+ laps) then a FMIC is probably superior.
All IMHO

Trending Topics
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Comparing power results from IC's/CC's on a rolling road, is VERY misleading.
"Most" of the gains seen, are not "gains", but just a lesser loss, due to the poor suitablity of RR fans to supply air to a TMIC.
You will see intake temps with a TMIC, on a RR, that you will NEVER see on the road. A well designed CC works well, but ultimately will also warm up, and the efficiency will deteriate. While a FMIC will be the most consistant.
Mark.
"Most" of the gains seen, are not "gains", but just a lesser loss, due to the poor suitablity of RR fans to supply air to a TMIC.
You will see intake temps with a TMIC, on a RR, that you will NEVER see on the road. A well designed CC works well, but ultimately will also warm up, and the efficiency will deteriate. While a FMIC will be the most consistant.
Mark.
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Yes, I've got a nice BIG full width radiator for the charge water cooling. The most I have seen is a 5 deg C rise in water temperature, this was after 5 X 1/4 mile drag runs back to back.
Sitting with the fans on for 5 minutes dropped the temp back to ambient. A TMIC would just have got even hotter under these conditions.
Agree with Mark that FMIC is ultimately superior regards temperature control however you do have all that extra volume of pipework etc which, in my experience, takes the sharpness out of the throttle response.
Andy
Sitting with the fans on for 5 minutes dropped the temp back to ambient. A TMIC would just have got even hotter under these conditions.
Agree with Mark that FMIC is ultimately superior regards temperature control however you do have all that extra volume of pipework etc which, in my experience, takes the sharpness out of the throttle response.
Andy
Lot of good points made already... 
Bear in mind, it is possible to put together a decent chargecooler system for £500 or less which is considerably cheaper than any front mounted ICs I have seen.
How many times are you going to ask this question, Markus ?
Thanks
Gavin
[Edited by GavinP - 6/20/2002 1:02:44 PM]

Bear in mind, it is possible to put together a decent chargecooler system for £500 or less which is considerably cheaper than any front mounted ICs I have seen.
How many times are you going to ask this question, Markus ?

Thanks
Gavin
[Edited by GavinP - 6/20/2002 1:02:44 PM]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM






