But Jamie does advertise with a banner ad you guys

I've always found him to be helpfull on his posts, you can't knock a bloke for trying to promote his business can you...

This is the first negative post I've seen about him, I'm sure others will back me up to say he's doing a great job

Lets turn this thread into a positive one shall we?

 

I did apologise to you Trout, I wont do this again, but I do see others doing it also.

Jamie

 

Surely the continued success of scoobynet relies on the support of it's advertisers- both financially and in terms of their advice and experience.

I really cannot see why jamies comments, or his link tagged on as a 'signature', should upset you so much?

However, I agree that blatant commercial posts such as 'i can supply that for £X' should be policed and removed.

Certain other 'commercially minded' individuals who post here never seem to be chastised in this manner.

But come on, guys, give Jamie a break. He does give an awful lot of help and advice to less experienced scoobynetters than yourself

 

Agreed. I've never bought anything from Jamie, but it's nice to know there are chaps such as the said person, out there. If it wasn't for these people you'd have an air filter made from Kleenex and an exhaust made from scaffolding.
Put you self in Jamie's position, would you not do the same? Honestly?

 

Jamie's got an ad banner does he not? I thought complaining against advertising is only reserved for those without banner ads.

 

i was under the same impression as Katana.
Can we have a definitive decision on this please?

 

May i suggest you mail me in future trout, if you have things about the forum you dont like so i can take a look. There is no need to post a thread like this, my mail address is available.

I am locking this thread.

 

we dont need any agree, disagree posts in this forum. I am discussing this with people off line. If you had a mail adress i would do the same with you also trout!

 

mail me offline trout please!

[Edited by johnfelstead - 6/12/2002 11:09:20 AM]

 

same here too!

[Edited by johnfelstead - 6/12/2002 11:10:29 AM]