http://tompride.wordpress.com/2012/1...he-was-a-tory/

 

Brill..

 

Haha.
Very realistic , I remember that lot / cabinet were more or less hated

 

Thats bad luck.

Trouble is, if I met him I would not be able to resist telling him what a useless job he has done so far!

Les

 

You could try Les, but I don't think he'd listen!

 

Well he might try as you rightly say, but he would have little choice!

Les

 

See this is getting a fair bit of coverage on the news now, still no idea who it actually is though.

 

This person is in no way connected to paedophilia...

 

...........hope not as his mob built my house going back a few years.

Shaun

 

I thought it was all out that it's Ted Heath?

 

Perhaps you could show us where?!

 

ted heath - no.
who ever it is, they are still with us (hence the name hasnt been made public.....)

 

Can't say I remember him, but..

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...gue-known.html

 

ive not been keeping up to date with such issues, does no-one really know the names involved?

 

If they do they would be very foolish to mention them.

Les

 

And why a dead man would approach the court for an injunction?

 

Well this story has taken an interesting turn.
Reassuring to see that the BBC are still carrying on with Children in need.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20269114

 

Its very possible, if you haven't seen it already, watch this: http://www.wanttoknow.info/060501conspiracyofsilence

That documentary reveals a child abuse ring that happened in the US and went all the way to the top echelons of power.

These people live in a bubble, don't believe me, watch "Secret of Our Streets: Portland Road" to get an idea of what I am on about and why it's very possible that this kind of sickening thing has/is going on.

As for the guy who cried wolf, I think he got paid off or told to stay quiet but in a reverse kind of way the Tory has been outed even if he claims he has nothing to do with the child abuse claims.

 

How predictable.

 

Its one thing to suspect such a conspiracy, but another to state that you think that actually happened unless you have the evidence to prove it. Dangerous ground I reckon!

Les

 

JT not trying to predictable but this is a forum so just throwing different ideas into the stream.

Les not making judgement so apologies for the short blunt replies, been using a phone to write messages.

Just an opinion, my opinion, not fact. All I am saying is that it's highlighted and maybe created an opportunity to get some facts right through a proper investigation and shake-up from the top down (like the misreporting done by BBC Newsnight to the way the Jimmy investigation was halted).

But mark my words, more and more stories will surface, because we do live in an ugly world no matter how much we try to believe it's not.

With regards to the US documentary, I very much doubt it's a conspiracy, there were a lot of facts behind a very thorough piece of journalism however it could all be coincidence.

Either way there is going to be a shake up in my opinion and it will not be pretty.

 

Just throwing different ideas in to the stream that someone who it's reasonable to assume is not an abuser of children actually is?! Just throwing that out there, right? As per the unfalsifiable gibberish you posted the other day I don't think this needs any further analysis, only contempt. An ugly world indeed.

 

I don't know how anyone can cope with texting on a 'phone. But then I am pretty well rubbish on a normal keyboard anyway!

Yes I meant that it could be dangerous making predictions etc. on a forum, I think some people were done for that a short while ago...expensively too.

Well there was supposed to be a bunch of paedophiles all at it together, I hope they catch up with them all.

I imagine there will be a group all doing their best to protect each other one way or another and they won't all get away with it with luck.

Les