Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

Apple Must Publish Notice Samsung Didn’t Copy IPad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 July 2012, 10:43 PM
  #31  
richiewong
Twatful
 
richiewong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Grew up and don't drive Scoobs anymore!
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Am I wrong but don't Apple use Samsung screens for the iPad 3?

Not that I give a flying f*ck about either product

Last edited by Lisawrx; 18 July 2012 at 11:43 PM.
Old 18 July 2012, 10:43 PM
  #32  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
Lot of LOLing going on. Apple threads really do bring the loonies out of the woodwork.
Yep, only took you 27 minutes from the opening post.
Old 18 July 2012, 10:44 PM
  #33  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by richiewong
Am I wrong but don't Apple use Samsung screens for the iPad 3?
Apple have a great relationship with parts of Samsung. That's the parts they buy not the parts Samsung copy.
Old 18 July 2012, 10:45 PM
  #34  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Yep, only took you 27 minutes from the opening post.
You're my favourite loony Jon.
Old 18 July 2012, 10:49 PM
  #35  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
Apple have a great relationship with parts of Samsung. That's the parts they buy not the parts Samsung copy.
By the court of law, it's been ruled that Samsung does not copy Apple! You'll be able to see for yourself soon enough Apple's admission on their very own website, various newspapers and magazines!
Old 18 July 2012, 10:51 PM
  #36  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
You're my favourite loony Jon.
the feeling is mutual!
Old 18 July 2012, 10:53 PM
  #37  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
Apple have a great relationship with parts of Samsung. That's the parts they buy not the parts Samsung copy.
Just read the patents in question, it is nothing more than very clever lawyers and bigger back handers.

Not good for us in any way (the consumers)
Old 18 July 2012, 11:01 PM
  #38  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

No it's not. The whole system needs a shake up. HTC are playing an even ****tier game right now, buying and licensing patents from a desperate HP in order to counter sue, that's just nuts.

Last edited by JackClark; 18 July 2012 at 11:04 PM.
Old 18 July 2012, 11:02 PM
  #39  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
By the court of law, it's been ruled that Samsung does not copy Apple! You'll be able to see for yourself soon enough Apple's admission on their very own website, various newspapers and magazines!
Can't wait.
Old 18 July 2012, 11:10 PM
  #40  
scud8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
scud8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My problem with Apple is that they seem to have a very skewed view of the value of inventions. They see little value in the technical inventions from the likes of Samsung, Nokia etc that have taken many, many man years of R&D to produce and are fundamental to making their devices work. On the other hand they seem to see massive value in their own user interface and design patents that haven't taken anywhere near that level of investment and just make the device aesthetically pleasing and a bit easier to use. But I'm an engineer, so I would say that.
Old 18 July 2012, 11:12 PM
  #41  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

What about Apples chips? No good?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A5

Last edited by JackClark; 18 July 2012 at 11:13 PM.
Old 18 July 2012, 11:12 PM
  #42  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
The whole system needs a shake up.
It does, stop patent laws equating marketing strategy.
Old 18 July 2012, 11:17 PM
  #43  
scud8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
scud8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
What about Apples chips? No good?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A5
Most of the IP in these chips is licensed from ARM and other fabless semi companies. All the image processing is based on well known algorithms developed by researchers over the last 20-30 years. Apple does almost no technical innovation of their own.
Old 18 July 2012, 11:20 PM
  #44  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You should of edited that link out of your post, not edited the ****in stupid thing in. How are you going to base an argument now?
Old 18 July 2012, 11:22 PM
  #45  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Don't tell him that ! He'll have a hissy fit
Old 18 July 2012, 11:23 PM
  #46  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,341
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

13 out of 43 contributions in this thread so far (before mine) by the same poster.

Bet you can't guess who
Old 18 July 2012, 11:31 PM
  #47  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scud8
Most of the IP in these chips is licensed from ARM and other fabless semi companies. All the image processing is based on well known algorithms developed by researchers over the last 20-30 years. Apple does almost no technical innovation of their own.
What about operating systems?
Old 18 July 2012, 11:34 PM
  #48  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
13 out of 43 contributions in this thread so far (before mine) by the same poster.

Bet you can't guess who
20 Apple haters and just me rebuffing them.
Old 18 July 2012, 11:36 PM
  #49  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
What about operating systems?
Lets concentrate on the chips first else the argument gets obfuscated, you brought it up, lets talk about it.
Old 18 July 2012, 11:49 PM
  #50  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dedrater
Lets concentrate on the chips first else the argument gets obfuscated, you brought it up, lets talk about it.
I didn't bring it up. Anyhow, threads been moved, it's over.
Old 18 July 2012, 11:54 PM
  #51  
scud8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
scud8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
What about operating systems?
Where to start! When Apple were still developing the original MAC OS it was way behind the curve - not even proper pre-emptive scheduling or memory protection when they canned it in 2002. They had to switch to a UNIX based kernel in OS X to catch up, so took loads of technology from the original BSD UNIX and extensions from various other companies.

I don't know a huge amount about the history of iOS, but I believe it was based on OS X.

Don't get me wrong, I think Apple are great at building products that hit a sweet spot in the market and coming up with user interface innovations that make them easy to use - and the idea of an app store was genius - but I don't think they do much technical innovation and they don't acknowledge the debt they owe the rest of the industry.
Old 19 July 2012, 07:50 AM
  #52  
Ant
Scooby Regular
 
Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Notts
Posts: 9,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I read thread like these and ask myself,Who really cares?
Old 19 July 2012, 08:22 AM
  #53  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scud8
Where to start! When Apple were still developing the original MAC OS it was way behind the curve - not even proper pre-emptive scheduling or memory protection when they canned it in 2002. They had to switch to a UNIX based kernel in OS X to catch up, so took loads of technology from the original BSD UNIX and extensions from various other companies.

I don't know a huge amount about the history of iOS, but I believe it was based on OS X.

Don't get me wrong, I think Apple are great at building products that hit a sweet spot in the market and coming up with user interface innovations that make them easy to use - and the idea of an app store was genius - but I don't think they do much technical innovation and they don't acknowledge the debt they owe the rest of the industry.
What about... I won't bother, no one cares and you'll never give Apple any real credit.
Old 19 July 2012, 09:05 AM
  #54  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ant
I read thread like these and ask myself,Who really cares?
Everyone that posted in Apple trolling thread for a start, that has got to be the largest and fastest growing thread of this year if not of all time on Scoobynet!
Old 19 July 2012, 11:43 AM
  #55  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Everyone that posted in Apple trolling thread for a start, that has got to be the largest and fastest growing thread of this year if not of all time on Scoobynet!
Someone should fire that up again, I can almost type again and voice recognition in Mountain Lion is beyond expectations as always with Apple.
Old 19 July 2012, 04:58 PM
  #56  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
20 Apple haters and just me rebuffing them.

I'm not a hater as I have quite a few apple products I just don't worship them
Old 19 July 2012, 05:06 PM
  #57  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
I'm not a hater as I have quite a few apple products I just don't worship them
What's your contribution?
Old 25 July 2012, 07:52 PM
  #58  
stedee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
stedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: nr leeds
Posts: 2,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
Lot of LOLing going on. Apple threads really do bring the loonies out of the woodwork.
lol you
Old 25 July 2012, 08:36 PM
  #59  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Thanks for bringing this up. So, who got the latest update from Samsung? Little gift from Apple.
Old 25 July 2012, 11:18 PM
  #60  
IWatkins
Scooby Regular
 
IWatkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gloucestershire, home of the lawnmower.
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jack. You really are deluded.


Quick Reply: Apple Must Publish Notice Samsung Didn’t Copy IPad



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM.