What do we all think of the Queen meeting McGuinness?
#31
Scooby Regular
So sorry for doubting your intel.
I missed the news bits do you have any recent links I could look at? I interested in what their talks entail.
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Where It Rains A Lot.
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Queen is shaking hands with the wrong McGuinness. She should be going out of her way to give big John a pat on the back, especially after he got another couple of wins at the Isle Of Man TT again this year.
#36
Scooby Regular
#37
Scooby Regular
Because Adams (political face of IRA or not he has blood on his hands) and McGuinness are terrorists responsible for the deaths of many innocent people including children. Forgive them and move on? Not a chance. You don't forgive terrorists just like the USA wouldn't have forgiven OBL if he had wanted to shake hands before being assassinated.
#38
Scooby Regular
Because Adams (political face of IRA or not he has blood on his hands) and McGuinness are terrorists responsible for the deaths of many innocent people including children. Forgive them and move on? Not a chance. You don't forgive terrorists just like the USA wouldn't have forgiven OBL if he had wanted to shake hands before being assassinated.
#43
Scooby Regular
I simply stated not all countries are prepared to forgive terrorism, and whilst a poor example as OBL is dead it is the most obvious comparison being that Al Qaeda is the the #1 terrorist organisation on the planet and the USA is it's #1 target.
I can't accept our head of state shaking hands with a cold blooded murderer as a good thing to do. That is how I feel. She has done it now and I understand the reasons for doing so but I still don't agree with it.
I can't accept our head of state shaking hands with a cold blooded murderer as a good thing to do. That is how I feel. She has done it now and I understand the reasons for doing so but I still don't agree with it.
#47
Scooby Regular
#48
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
I can see Jamz point;
You say America would not shake hands with OBL (well a bit moot since they assasinated him) and Al-Qaida is its number one enemy...Still hypocritcal as the USA originally funded it!
So here we have same country that provided funding for the IRA, whom also provided funding to the groups that are now better known as Al-Qaida.
Point being; America did shake hands with Al-Qaida's founders just so it could spite the Russians.
You say America would not shake hands with OBL (well a bit moot since they assasinated him) and Al-Qaida is its number one enemy...Still hypocritcal as the USA originally funded it!
So here we have same country that provided funding for the IRA, whom also provided funding to the groups that are now better known as Al-Qaida.
Point being; America did shake hands with Al-Qaida's founders just so it could spite the Russians.
#49
Scooby Regular
#51
Scooby Regular
It's not nice at all, but one of those compromises that has to be beared for the ultimate outcome. I totally agree with Anonymous. It's pretty disgusting seeing him walking free, and I don't buy that freedom fighter tripe. Presumably the IRA targetted innocents to make a point. That makes them cold-blooded murderers and nothing else. And I am aware that lots of Americans support, but it's the same as much of the electorate in any country... they don't have a clue about the reality of the situation or are just too f*cking stupid to have principles that apply equality to all in the country where that is supposedly the most important thing. This is worse in America because it is so insular. Who knows what warped ideas they had/have about the IRA.
#52
Scooby Regular
#53
Scooby Regular
#54
Scooby Regular
I can see Jamz point;
You say America would not shake hands with OBL (well a bit moot since they assasinated him) and Al-Qaida is its number one enemy...Still hypocritcal as the USA originally funded it!
So here we have same country that provided funding for the IRA, whom also provided funding to the groups that are now better known as Al-Qaida.
Point being; America did shake hands with Al-Qaida's founders just so it could spite the Russians.
You say America would not shake hands with OBL (well a bit moot since they assasinated him) and Al-Qaida is its number one enemy...Still hypocritcal as the USA originally funded it!
So here we have same country that provided funding for the IRA, whom also provided funding to the groups that are now better known as Al-Qaida.
Point being; America did shake hands with Al-Qaida's founders just so it could spite the Russians.
Al Qaeda was born when the USA basically fcuked him over at the end of the Russian/Afghan war and he used religion to twist and turn its values to an extremist ideal to gather support to fight the USA simply to get revenge for them ******* him over. None of it for him was about religion, that was just a vehicle for him to use to get Worldwide support through extremist Islamic teachings. His terrorism was born from the way he was treated by the CIA and US government when the Afghan war ended.
#58
Scooby Regular
Why do u keep mentioning OBL? Do you not have the ability to talk about the actual point of this thread. To answer you though, Cameron isn't as bad as OBL, Blair on the other hand....well I wonder out of the 2 who actually killed more innocent people.
#59
Why should the passage of time make any difference to his responsibilities?
If I had been in Prince Philip's place I would have found it very difficult to resist aiming a flying kick at his "fergibblers"
I think it was intolerable to put the Queen in such a position.
Les
If I had been in Prince Philip's place I would have found it very difficult to resist aiming a flying kick at his "fergibblers"
I think it was intolerable to put the Queen in such a position.
Les
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post