Version 6 sti import vs E46 m3
Well I completely annihilated my pal on Sunday in his E46 M3 SMG. And when I say annihilated I mean at all speeds, in every gear and with my boost pegged back.
I would think a classic with 330 should see off an M3 but don't expect to leave him for dust. The M3 would start to gain on you as speeds increased and when your car topped out at 145 the M3 would sail past.
I would think a classic with 330 should see off an M3 but don't expect to leave him for dust. The M3 would start to gain on you as speeds increased and when your car topped out at 145 the M3 would sail past.
and thats off my tom tom live 1000 .M3 is restricted to 155 mph which is the same as a P1 with 276 bhp,so not a done deal imho.
i would be a little worried about pushing your engine,they have a tendancy to go pop,just heard of a friends sti5 just gone pop after a trackday at combe,the day before it was mapped to 310bhp.
as you know craigo the newage motor is a stronger engine.if you have the funds by all means push it a bit,but i would expect you may have to rebuild.
im sure a type r with 350-360 would be more than capable of sticking with the hawk,if not be a little quicker as its so light. but as we all know to get reliability and high power output from a classic is not cheap.
as you know craigo the newage motor is a stronger engine.if you have the funds by all means push it a bit,but i would expect you may have to rebuild.
im sure a type r with 350-360 would be more than capable of sticking with the hawk,if not be a little quicker as its so light. but as we all know to get reliability and high power output from a classic is not cheap.

Will you bring your R over and stop his grins
Not to sure about that matty,my current uk turbo ran 242 bhp and hit 143 mph when fitted with prodrive ecu & 242 bhp.fter fiting vf 28 and suitable mods (328 bhp)my current car tops out in 4th gear at 135 mph and 161 @6300rpm
and thats off my tom tom live 1000 .
M3 is restricted to 155 mph which is the same as a P1 with 276 bhp,so not a done deal imho.
and thats off my tom tom live 1000 .M3 is restricted to 155 mph which is the same as a P1 with 276 bhp,so not a done deal imho.

it will be mapped soon,it certainly covered the ground well at 340 so with 370 ish im expecting it to be nippy.
a hawk with same power would be a quick car no doubt and will probably have alot more torque,but power to weight would suggest type r to be very rapid,especially with the close ratio box.
it would be interesting.....

a hawk with same power would be a quick car no doubt and will probably have alot more torque,but power to weight would suggest type r to be very rapid,especially with the close ratio box.
it would be interesting.....
it will be mapped soon,it certainly covered the ground well at 340 so with 370 ish im expecting it to be nippy.
a hawk with same power would be a quick car no doubt and will probably have alot more torque,but power to weight would suggest type r to be very rapid,especially with the close ratio box.
it would be interesting.....

a hawk with same power would be a quick car no doubt and will probably have alot more torque,but power to weight would suggest type r to be very rapid,especially with the close ratio box.
it would be interesting.....
Last edited by craigo; Jun 15, 2012 at 12:06 AM.
Hawk will be quicker on attack as it's much better balanced and stiffer car, type r might be quick on the straights , but will be deffo outhandled on the bends. DCCD on the type r is acient comparing to hawks. Brakes are pants etc. So the whole package is not great I'm afraid. As much as Iove classics , tests have been done and proven , that new age cars behave better nowadays no matter the weight. But the most important thing IMHO is the driver. I love my classics for the rawness physical feel they give you, but I fully am aware of that new ages are more capable cars. It's just most new cars are too good and gives less feedback comparing to classic. But theres couple specials Spec C and Ra R . Would love one of those. Just my 2 p worth.
Not to sure about that matty,my current uk turbo ran 242 bhp and hit 143 mph when fitted with prodrive ecu & 242 bhp.fter fiting vf 28 and suitable mods (328 bhp)my current car tops out in 4th gear at 135 mph and 161 @6300rpm
and thats off my tom tom live 1000 .
M3 is restricted to 155 mph which is the same as a P1 with 276 bhp,so not a done deal imho.
and thats off my tom tom live 1000 .M3 is restricted to 155 mph which is the same as a P1 with 276 bhp,so not a done deal imho.

What gearbox ?
Standard STI V6 will not see 160mph.
Std uk 5 speed box box definitely will & more importantly live to tell the tale another day 
To me there is great satisfaction when you go past a bloke who has spent £40k+ on there Audi /bmw only for them not to be able to stay with a car 12yrs old
, now that's value for money IMHO.
Classics may be quite old & dated now,but they can still mix it with newer, better eqipted/modern day cars. What they lack in refinement and build quality is made up by the the fact they can still cover ground at a rapid rate of knots and make put a smile on the face on the person behind the wheel.

To me there is great satisfaction when you go past a bloke who has spent £40k+ on there Audi /bmw only for them not to be able to stay with a car 12yrs old
, now that's value for money IMHO.Classics may be quite old & dated now,but they can still mix it with newer, better eqipted/modern day cars. What they lack in refinement and build quality is made up by the the fact they can still cover ground at a rapid rate of knots and make put a smile on the face on the person behind the wheel.
Last edited by midnight; Jun 15, 2012 at 06:10 AM.
Std uk 5 speed box box definitely will & more importantly live to tell the tale another day 
To me there is great satisfaction when you go past a bloke who has spent £40k+ on there Audi /bmw only for them not to be able to stay with a car 12yrs old
, now that's value for money IMHO.
Classics may be quite old & dated now,but they can still mix it with newer, better eqipted/modern day cars. What they lack in refinement and build quality is made up by the the fact they can still cover ground at a rapid rate of knots and make put a smile on the face on the person behind the wheel.

To me there is great satisfaction when you go past a bloke who has spent £40k+ on there Audi /bmw only for them not to be able to stay with a car 12yrs old
, now that's value for money IMHO.Classics may be quite old & dated now,but they can still mix it with newer, better eqipted/modern day cars. What they lack in refinement and build quality is made up by the the fact they can still cover ground at a rapid rate of knots and make put a smile on the face on the person behind the wheel.

^^ so true!! Before I bought my blob my daily ride was an E36 m3 Evo (still have it just ain't had much use lately, possibly for sale if anyone interested lol
) have had many an encounter with the young chavs with their go faster back box and stripes over the years, Most of them did have the legs on the bm during launch as the back wheels just light up if u drop the clutch, did beat the odd few tho, but not many have had the legs top flight! There have been a couple that have but they must have had some serious money spent on them!
As for above with the 155 that only applies if it aint even played with as mine would sail to the pin, it would hit the 155 in 5th with another gear left
and I can honestly say the bm will out run the sti hands down and with ease, but the sti would blitz the bm of the line, like the posts say above if u can drive then general road use (within speed limits
) then I know my bm would not catch scoob full stop! Need big open roads for the bm to come in to it's own
As for above with the 155 that only applies if it aint even played with as mine would sail to the pin, it would hit the 155 in 5th with another gear left
and I can honestly say the bm will out run the sti hands down and with ease, but the sti would blitz the bm of the line, like the posts say above if u can drive then general road use (within speed limits
) then I know my bm would not catch scoob full stop! Need big open roads for the bm to come in to it's own
does this help
ths was last year in my old beloved version 6 which i bought standered but was running 347 bhp in this particular vid, my time was 125 cant member at the m3 was. but as u can see no match lol
ive had my old classic of the 160 mph clock running 347hp and als had my p1 of the clock running 330 hp when i first bought it with 5 speed and had it at 170 on 6 speed at 430 hp. to be honest they go well over 155 that was just me backing off everytime i hit the speedo and belive me they get there quick running over 400.
oh and by the way a 6 speed box slows ur car down by half a seccond as i found with my classic and p1
oh and by the way a 6 speed box slows ur car down by half a seccond as i found with my classic and p1
Last edited by Aamar786; Jun 15, 2012 at 09:03 AM.
I think that if both cars were rolling before the race began then it would of been much much closer.
160+ on a standard STI 5 speed, I'm a little dubious to be honest. We had 145 in a STI V2 one evening, car was running 305 and wouldn't go any faster. Remember that the UK boxes are longer so yes, maybe will touch 160.
However, I'm over 400bhp and using a P1 box, would I ever consider pushing it towards its top speed..... Would I ****,
Obviously a classic running near 350bhp will be quicker than an M3, it's far lighter and has more power. And from a standing start an M3 will be no match for any classic.
I think that if both cars were rolling before the race began then it would of been much much closer.
160+ on a standard STI 5 speed, I'm a little dubious to be honest. We had 145 in a STI V2 one evening, car was running 305 and wouldn't go any faster. Remember that the UK boxes are longer so yes, maybe will touch 160.
However, I'm over 400bhp and using a P1 box, would I ever consider pushing it towards its top speed..... Would I ****,
I think that if both cars were rolling before the race began then it would of been much much closer.
160+ on a standard STI 5 speed, I'm a little dubious to be honest. We had 145 in a STI V2 one evening, car was running 305 and wouldn't go any faster. Remember that the UK boxes are longer so yes, maybe will touch 160.
However, I'm over 400bhp and using a P1 box, would I ever consider pushing it towards its top speed..... Would I ****,
Last edited by Aamar786; Jun 15, 2012 at 09:18 AM.
anyway not sayin m3s are slow personally i think people just dont knw how to dive em. im gettin an e46 m3 very soon soo ill let u know how fast they really r lol u gota remeber were comparing a standeed car to cars hat have been heavily modified
I had a play with an E46 M3 the other month in my V3 STi (private road of course).
Was a rolling from 50ish up to around 130ish. Was awkward as he started a few car lengths in front of me and got the jump off roundabout before me. I initially gained on a him a tad still, but then it evened out. Mine is around 320ish....
Confident I would have nailed it if went together and same time from 1st or 2nd gear - but the M3 is always going to be stronger at higher speeds than a Subaru.
Was a rolling from 50ish up to around 130ish. Was awkward as he started a few car lengths in front of me and got the jump off roundabout before me. I initially gained on a him a tad still, but then it evened out. Mine is around 320ish....
Confident I would have nailed it if went together and same time from 1st or 2nd gear - but the M3 is always going to be stronger at higher speeds than a Subaru.

steve
Your right there buddy, M3's are far from slow. Under 1600kg and with over 340bhp, once they are rolling they go well.
Would embarrass a standard newage STI and show up a classic in standard trim.
Type r gear box / final drive is geared for 157 mph top speed, don't know what uk 5th will do but i presume a bit more, banny put a graph up a while back which had all the final drive ratio's and speeds they were capable of, maybe he'll pop along and do it again.
As for the standard M3 in the right hands i recon it will be like the classic vs Newage and be a better balanced, better brakes affair.
I'm also not too sure about the high speed m3 vs newage as my old blob wrx was flashing an m3 to get out the way from ish 110mph up to off the clock, in germany.
As for the standard M3 in the right hands i recon it will be like the classic vs Newage and be a better balanced, better brakes affair.
I'm also not too sure about the high speed m3 vs newage as my old blob wrx was flashing an m3 to get out the way from ish 110mph up to off the clock, in germany.
I'd say with your power it is achievable.
My mate had the lighter E36 M3 Evo and was running 331bhp and did the 1/4 in 13.8. So doubt your mates 1/4 time to be honest.
Anyway we all know straight line racing is for pussies, take him a run around a back road and show him what its all about.
My mate had the lighter E36 M3 Evo and was running 331bhp and did the 1/4 in 13.8. So doubt your mates 1/4 time to be honest.
Anyway we all know straight line racing is for pussies, take him a run around a back road and show him what its all about.
Have to agree buddy, I ran a 12.9 @ 106 in my scoobs and it was 323bhp at the time. Scoobs should always get the best start, but M3 is better top end
i had a play with a e46 my in my p1 running 330bhp of the lights there was no compotition for the p1 get them both on a long straight road rolling at 70mph the p1 would keep up for a while but then the m3 would sail past
i have a friend who did 186 then bottled it according to his tomtom in his m3-full decat system cold air feed with big cone filter and a remap
i have a friend who did 186 then bottled it according to his tomtom in his m3-full decat system cold air feed with big cone filter and a remap

To answer the original question
around 310bhp upwards should be enough to stay with an M3 up to around 110-120mph but after that the M3 is faster at that power level. I don't think the 155 limiter is dead accurate and they can go on to around 165 but I've never tested that in mine
Paulo,
Slightly off topic but what brakes you using on you M3. The standard items are utter sh1te !
My buddy now has an 04 plate but did have a year old one a couple of years ago, both cars had terrible brakes.
He's looking to upgrade them, any thoughts ?
Slightly off topic but what brakes you using on you M3. The standard items are utter sh1te !
My buddy now has an 04 plate but did have a year old one a couple of years ago, both cars had terrible brakes.
He's looking to upgrade them, any thoughts ?
Ive had a couple of interesting moments with M3`s, Ive got to admit i do like the 04 plate M3 and even considered buying one last year but i like spanking them in a scooby even more. IMO they are too very different machines, The M3 has the speed power and luxury that works well with every day driving, Town, motorway etc....
My scoob is fine for most journeys but the motorway is i bit of a pain at 4k RPM @80mph, Great for putting my foot down as i have torque on tap when in 6th, That is the only downfall for me the motorway driving(not that it goes on there much), If i wanted a luxury car i`d have bought one but as childish as it sounds i much prefer having fun in a scoob that can put a lot of other cars to shame, I might grow up one day...........But i doubt it
My scoob is fine for most journeys but the motorway is i bit of a pain at 4k RPM @80mph, Great for putting my foot down as i have torque on tap when in 6th, That is the only downfall for me the motorway driving(not that it goes on there much), If i wanted a luxury car i`d have bought one but as childish as it sounds i much prefer having fun in a scoob that can put a lot of other cars to shame, I might grow up one day...........But i doubt it
It's quite surprising that BMW didn't put 4 pots or something similar on them but they do ok.




