Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

PC for £500-£600

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04 December 2011, 11:12 AM
  #31  
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stirling
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 05 December 2011, 07:33 AM
  #32  
Saint AAI
Scooby Regular
 
Saint AAI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.scan.co.uk/todayonly/

Today only deal (5th Dec)
£500

1TB Seagate ST31000524AS Barracuda 7200.12, SATA 6Gb/s, 7200rpm, 32MB Cache, 8.5ms, NCQ

650W PSU, Coolermaster GX RS650-ACAAE3-UK, 85% Eff', 80 PLUS Bronze, SLI/CrossFire, EPS 12V, Quiet Fan, ATX v2.31

Asus P8Z68-V LX, Intel Z68, S 1155, DDR3, SATA III - 6Gb/s, SATA RAID, PCIe 2.0 (x16), D-Sub/ DVI-D/ HDMI, ATX

BitFenix Survivor CORE, Black, Mid Tower Gaming Case with Handle w/o PSU Lan Party Favourite!

Colors IT ACT KB-8108 Multimedia Office Pro Keyboard, Silver/Black with MIC/Speakers SKYPE Ready

Intel Core i7 2600K Unlocked S1155, Sandy Bridge, Quad, 3.4GHz, HD3000 IGP 850Mhz, 8MB Cache 95W Retail

Samsung WriteMaster SH-S222AB/BEBE 22x DVD±R, 12x DVD±R, DVD+RW x8/-RW x6, SATA, Black, OEM


Need to add RAM, graphics card and Windows, also you have to build it yourself. Total cost will be around £720 with GeForce GTX 560-Ti 1GB Graphics and 8GB of RAM. Just need Windows then.

Last edited by Saint AAI; 05 December 2011 at 07:39 AM.
Old 05 December 2011, 07:46 AM
  #33  
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
CREWJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aberdare / Daventry
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With Windows that's close to £800. Slightly more than the OP wants to spend.
Old 05 December 2011, 08:11 AM
  #34  
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stirling
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the build suggestion.

I can get free delivery with Scan, so it's only really £40 more than the Chillblaster option. Though having it build and working is appealing.

Question is - is a i7 2600k worth getting compared to a 4.5 i5 2400?

Cheers
Richard.
Old 05 December 2011, 08:29 AM
  #35  
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
CREWJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aberdare / Daventry
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TBH, you won't notice much difference unless you perform hyperthreading tasks. Day to day there will be absolutely no difference.
Old 05 December 2011, 10:07 AM
  #36  
Neanderthal
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northampton, Xbox GamerTag - Neanderthal1976
Posts: 6,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scotsman
Thanks for the build suggestion.

I can get free delivery with Scan, so it's only really £40 more than the Chillblaster option. Though having it build and working is appealing.

Question is - is a i7 2600k worth getting compared to a 4.5 i5 2400?

Cheers
Richard.
You're slipping into the net that caught me mate, "well the i7 is only x amount more" etc. In the end I spent about a grand!
Old 05 December 2011, 10:30 AM
  #37  
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stirling
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol- true :-)

I'm going to stick to the Chillblast system and will order when I get back to the house this afternoon.
Old 05 December 2011, 02:15 PM
  #38  
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
jura11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Posts: 10,523
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Build own PC its much more fun,pre-build PC are OK if you are don't want to do build,but i'm still building mine PC with mine selected parts and i know these parts working..

i7 vs i5 i don't know,really depends for what PC is build,if its for heavy Photoshop,Video editing and making graphic and Virtualization(VmWare etc) i would say i7 will be bang on...

If you are just gamer and you are not looking for these above thing i would say i5 will be enough for you

And about the spec,i personally buying only Asus MB with these i've good experience and mostly important great features and easy too overclock,Memory Corsair or G-Skill are mine favourite(really 8GB is minimum and i would say 12-16GB should be enough for any application for future),GPU i'm using and have good experience with ATi GPU due are more energy efficient..HDD i would say for OS i would go with SSD and for other files i would go with 1TB HDD(but with these prices,not sure if you can wait until next year),PSU they're plenty out there i would go with Modular and 80+ at minimum and OCZ series are great for money.Case i would go only with Coolermaster or if its budget Li-an its just great

Jura
Old 05 December 2011, 02:29 PM
  #39  
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stirling
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thansk Jura - but at £729 fully build for:

Cooler Master Elite 430 Black ATX Case
Intel Core i5 2500K Processor overclocked to 4.5GHz
Corsair A70 CPU Cooler
Asus P8Z68-V LE Motherboard
GeForce GTX 560-Ti 1GB Graphics Card
8GB PC3-10666 DDR3 Memory
24x Sony DVD-RW Drive
1000GB SATA 7200rpm Hard Disk
600watt Corsair PSU
Onboard High Definition Audio
Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit OEM

then the different between just buying the parts and paying for the build isn't that great really and I'm going to take the easy route.

Thanks for the advice re i7/i5 - I'm only going to be playing some games on it, as do all my work on my mac. Not that I'm the biggest game player either these days, but would be nice to have a machine that can play the latest titles if I wanted to - plus I use my home PC everyday and my current one has lasted me 5 years, so amortising the £730 over the next 3+ years is pretty cheap on a per day usage.
Old 05 December 2011, 02:44 PM
  #40  
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
jura11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Posts: 10,523
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Scotsman
Thansk Jura - but at £729 fully build for:

Cooler Master Elite 430 Black ATX Case
Intel Core i5 2500K Processor overclocked to 4.5GHz
Corsair A70 CPU Cooler
Asus P8Z68-V LE Motherboard
GeForce GTX 560-Ti 1GB Graphics Card
8GB PC3-10666 DDR3 Memory
24x Sony DVD-RW Drive
1000GB SATA 7200rpm Hard Disk
600watt Corsair PSU
Onboard High Definition Audio
Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit OEM

then the different between just buying the parts and paying for the build isn't that great really and I'm going to take the easy route.

Thanks for the advice re i7/i5 - I'm only going to be playing some games on it, as do all my work on my mac. Not that I'm the biggest game player either these days, but would be nice to have a machine that can play the latest titles if I wanted to - plus I use my home PC everyday and my current one has lasted me 5 years, so amortising the £730 over the next 3+ years is pretty cheap on a per day usage.

This CPU cooler its not the best(but better than OE CPU cooler),but at this price i would like to see at least Noctua CPU cooler...

Yes sometimes easy route its just great and at least its nothing too worry about that.

For gaming will be great spec i must admit,lot of newer games still not using full potential of Duo cores,not the Quad cores(all games are GPU intensive,not the GPU),GPU should be all right too.
Really depends what games you are playing,but still you can buy second GPU,but not sure if this MB support multi GPU,if yes if its support Crossfire or SLi

Agreed with your usage,this PC will pay off nicely on end of the cycle


Jura
Old 05 December 2011, 02:56 PM
  #41  
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stirling
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 05 December 2011, 03:01 PM
  #42  
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stirling
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If all new games are GPU reliant, would a i3 based system (that has been overclocked) be as good, if you had a decent GPU?
Old 05 December 2011, 03:09 PM
  #43  
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
jura11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Posts: 10,523
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Scotsman
If all new games are GPU reliant, would a i3 based system (that has been overclocked) be as good, if you had a decent GPU?
Really depends on games,as i said most games still use just 1 and 2 cores mostly and mostly games are just GPU intesive.

i3 its duo core,which have Hyper Threading and in some games i5 its faster around 20% at stock speeds.If i3 is overclocked and have decent GPU i would say will be fast as i5 at stock speed.

Jura
Old 05 December 2011, 03:11 PM
  #44  
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
CREWJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aberdare / Daventry
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It could be but you would notice a difference then. The i5 should be a quad core where the i3 would most definitely be a dual core.

Damn Ninjas.....
Old 05 December 2011, 04:10 PM
  #45  
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stirling
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol - I should just order the faster system and be done with it :-)

Thanks again for the help.
Old 05 December 2011, 04:52 PM
  #46  
Neanderthal
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northampton, Xbox GamerTag - Neanderthal1976
Posts: 6,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you don't order it soon someone will be along to say "don't buy anything yet, the next release of graphics cards is about to be released and this will drop the price of current gfx cards..."
Old 05 December 2011, 04:54 PM
  #47  
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stirling
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Neanderthal
If you don't order it soon someone will be along to say "don't buy anything yet, the next release of graphics cards is about to be released and this will drop the price of current gfx cards..."
I've ordered it - phew!!!!
Old 05 December 2011, 05:26 PM
  #48  
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
bigsinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my i3 overclocks to 4.4Ghz very nicely. on air as well
Old 05 December 2011, 10:27 PM
  #49  
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
jura11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Posts: 10,523
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CREWJ
It could be but you would notice a difference then. The i5 should be a quad core where the i3 would most definitely be a dual core.

Damn Ninjas.....
Really depends on games,this should help and clear/prove mine points




In some games you will gain with raw CPU power,but in some games you can gain just few FPS..

Jura

Originally Posted by Neanderthal
If you don't order it soon someone will be along to say "don't buy anything yet, the next release of graphics cards is about to be released and this will drop the price of current gfx cards..."
Yes that's good point,like my friend still waiting when HD59xx will drop and still waiting and waiting,i bought mine in USA two for price of one here

Jura
Old 06 December 2011, 01:02 AM
  #50  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Chillblast ftw! i bought the shadow system with a few tweaks and the sandy i5 oc'd to 4.6ghz, £575 all in tis a rocket ship Will be more now thou as they had to put up their prices due to HDD shortages.
Old 06 December 2011, 06:42 AM
  #51  
Scotsman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Stirling
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Chillblast Fusion Hurricane ordered :-) though touch and go whether I will get it before Xmas. Was tempted by the shadow system too - but decided to pay a little more to get more memory and a GeForce GTX 560-Ti.

http://www.chillblast.com/Chillblast...Hurricane.html

Good to see that Chillblast have a standard 2 year collect and return warranty as well - and all the reviews of the Chillblast systems are excellent.

Last edited by Scotsman; 06 December 2011 at 06:44 AM.
Old 06 December 2011, 07:21 AM
  #52  
Littleted
Scooby Regular
 
Littleted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Leeds
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

It'll fly , sons is a chill core i5 and ati 5850 does everything mw3 bf3 warcraft maxed

Mine an i7 clocked with 5870 and I can barely tell the diff and if I had to say anything about my sons I'd prob say I need to upgrade his VGA card now other than that it's been great

Processor wise not much in it

Last edited by Littleted; 06 December 2011 at 08:20 AM.
Old 06 December 2011, 07:43 AM
  #53  
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
CREWJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aberdare / Daventry
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have an i7 with a 5870 too
Old 06 December 2011, 10:39 AM
  #54  
Galifrey
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Galifrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Corsham
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
Really depends on games,this should help and clear/prove mine points

Most of our in game testing was limited to outside factors like limited GPU performance and with Black Ops, there is a cap on how high your FPS can go in-game. Dirt 2 did an amazing job at showing the difference in power between the three CPU’s. All three performed well but the i5 and i7 stand out with an improvement of almost 30 frames per second. Even so they still were very close in performance showing that Hyperthreading makes no difference to in game performance in any of the games we use to benchmark.




Thought I would at least show a bit more of the story rather than a random benchmark
Old 06 December 2011, 06:29 PM
  #55  
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
jura11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Posts: 10,523
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Galifrey




Thought I would at least show a bit more of the story rather than a random benchmark

Hi there if you are mean 3DMark,this doesn't show nothing,3DMark its only for benchmarking like CPU and GPU...

Jura
Old 06 December 2011, 08:26 PM
  #56  
Galifrey
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Galifrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Corsham
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
Hi there if you are mean 3DMark,this doesn't show nothing,3DMark its only for benchmarking like CPU and GPU...

Jura
Not just that, the fact that the GPU was the bottleneck in the graph you posted. With a GPU bottleneck you won't see any difference between the FPS.

2 of the games are vsync'd at 60fps, and only one game, dirt 2 wasn't gpu bottlenecked and took advantage of the faster CPU's.

Most of the games used as an example are console ports with no optimisations for hyperthreading (or indeed multicore cpu's), making all the benchmarks limited in value. What no benchmarks show is the advantages in the real world of multiple cores and hyperthreading when it comes to playing online, disk access while playing, etc etc. Simply put, just having to use onboard sound can skew real life play in favour of more cores and hyperthreading, changing which cores the program runs on (through task manager or command line shortcuts) can change real world results.

Other programs that fail to use all available cores successfully are better off with a faster clockspeed and therefore, your argument is true some of the time. I went without hyperthreading on my cpu as it enabled me to run the cpu 200mhz faster without issues.



That's an I7 920@4.2 ghz hyperthreading off
Old 06 December 2011, 08:45 PM
  #57  
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
jura11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Posts: 10,523
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Galifrey
Not just that, the fact that the GPU was the bottleneck in the graph you posted. With a GPU bottleneck you won't see any difference between the FPS.

2 of the games are vsync'd at 60fps, and only one game, dirt 2 wasn't gpu bottlenecked and took advantage of the faster CPU's.

Most of the games used as an example are console ports with no optimisations for hyperthreading (or indeed multicore cpu's), making all the benchmarks limited in value. What no benchmarks show is the advantages in the real world of multiple cores and hyperthreading when it comes to playing online, disk access while playing, etc etc. Simply put, just having to use onboard sound can skew real life play in favour of more cores and hyperthreading, changing which cores the program runs on (through task manager or command line shortcuts) can change real world results.

Other programs that fail to use all available cores successfully are better off with a faster clockspeed and therefore, your argument is true some of the time. I went without hyperthreading on my cpu as it enabled me to run the cpu 200mhz faster without issues.



That's an I7 920@4.2 ghz hyperthreading off
I'm still running too i7-920@4.4Ghz HT on without the problems,in some games with HT on(Grid etc),doesn't like HT on,GPU now i'm running 2x XFX HD5970(which we are bought in USA for price of one),but lots of games still doesn't support at all dual GPU

These 3DMark test are amazing for testing components,done on mine before and still think this is just benchmark(something like RR for cars).

This is good test of these CPU and difference between the lower range of LGA1155 is minimal and still think older i7-920 will do nice job at mostly games and cost less than above mentioned CPU..

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-12.html



Jura
Old 06 December 2011, 09:01 PM
  #58  
Galifrey
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Galifrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Corsham
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
I'm still running too i7-920@4.4Ghz HT on without the problems,in some games with HT on(Grid etc),doesn't like HT on,GPU now i'm running 2x XFX HD5970(which we are bought in USA for price of one),but lots of games still doesn't support at all dual GPU

These 3DMark test are amazing for testing components,done on mine before and still think this is just benchmark(something like RR for cars).

This is good test of these CPU and difference between the lower range of LGA1155 is minimal and still think older i7-920 will do nice job at mostly games and cost less than above mentioned CPU..

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-12.html



Jura
Nice overclock, that is a good chip you have there Are you running that on Air or Water?

I agree the i7-920 is a superb CPU, I am running it with a Gainward GTX-580 "Good" Edition, I previously had an Asus GTX-295 which was a dual GPU card, and lots of games couldn't use it properly, I would have been better off with a faster 280.

It is a real shame we have to deal with shoddy console ports for most of our decent games these days, although SWTOR which I have on pre-order is at least a PC-Specific game it just won't push the hardware much lol.
Old 06 December 2011, 09:56 PM
  #59  
jura11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
jura11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: www.slowboy-racing.co.uk
Posts: 10,523
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Galifrey
Nice overclock, that is a good chip you have there Are you running that on Air or Water?

I agree the i7-920 is a superb CPU, I am running it with a Gainward GTX-580 "Good" Edition, I previously had an Asus GTX-295 which was a dual GPU card, and lots of games couldn't use it properly, I would have been better off with a faster 280.

It is a real shame we have to deal with shoddy console ports for most of our decent games these days, although SWTOR which I have on pre-order is at least a PC-Specific game it just won't push the hardware much lol.
Its i7-920 D0 and i'm at moment on water,but maximum has been on air 4.3ghz with Noctua and HT off,with HT on has been somewhere near 4.1Ghz.

GTX-580 its great card,when first time we are tested GTX480 bloody hell they're been too hot at any case,not sure about the GTX-580..

Specific games has been few but still not the great deal,we will see


Jura
Old 07 December 2011, 08:10 AM
  #60  
Galifrey
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Galifrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Corsham
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
Its i7-920 D0 and i'm at moment on water,but maximum has been on air 4.3ghz with Noctua and HT off,with HT on has been somewhere near 4.1Ghz.

GTX-580 its great card,when first time we are tested GTX480 bloody hell they're been too hot at any case,not sure about the GTX-580..

Specific games has been few but still not the great deal,we will see


Jura
Yeah the 480 was a problem heat wise, the 580 seems a lot better, although the fans do get noisy when you push the card hard, not as noisy as some cards I have owned in the past.

Watercooled my 920 D0 as well, in a Corsair Obsidian 800D case which keeps all the cables tidy and all the air is filtered to improve the consistency on the GFX card cooler.


Quick Reply: PC for £500-£600



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 PM.