servicing.
04 November 2011, 12:17 AM
#158
Scooby Regular
jezzzzzzzus either simonrf has had one to many smirnof or he is an automated system on loop... he talks a lot of **** about..... well not a lot really .
i think he has gone now "maybe his mum caught him on his laptop past his bed time....
i think he has gone now "maybe his mum caught him on his laptop past his bed time....
04 November 2011, 12:33 AM
#159
Even so, from what I can tell Simon has nothing at all to add here apart from inane ramblings. Its still good **** to read but he's definitely a bummer
04 November 2011, 12:46 AM
#160
Scooby Regular
I think the real answer is Simon is a bumchum and not answering anything directed at him. I'm not saying TT is innocent as if you grab the tigers tail enough, eventually you'll get bitten.
Even so, from what I can tell Simon has nothing at all to add here apart from inane ramblings. Its still good **** to read but he's definitely a bummer
Even so, from what I can tell Simon has nothing at all to add here apart from inane ramblings. Its still good **** to read but he's definitely a bummer
04 November 2011, 07:58 AM
#162
911 C4 pilot
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In an Air Cooled Porsche
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, just to recap, as the grammar & spelling of our angry chum is making my eyes hurt:
TubbyTommy has upset the owner of a "modified" impreza. Also, he has been posting adverts for it on other sites.
Now the West Midlands Police want to duff Tommy up.
SimonRF seems to be more than one person. The one or more person using the account don't have the combined reading age of the average Sun reader, so maybe they are on half term & this is just a wind up?
TubbyTommy has upset the owner of a "modified" impreza. Also, he has been posting adverts for it on other sites.
Now the West Midlands Police want to duff Tommy up.
SimonRF seems to be more than one person. The one or more person using the account don't have the combined reading age of the average Sun reader, so maybe they are on half term & this is just a wind up?
04 November 2011, 08:55 AM
#164
You know i think he has gone and left me no phone number.
I was the winner of the original car when it was advertised on ebay sometime ago as being 440bhp and having 35k spent on it.
I had every intention of purchasing the car as it was only £1600,which is a bargain for a 440 bhp car and worth far more in parts.
On winning the auction i asked for proof of work done,which in the listing he said he had receipts for and it turned out he had no receipts at all and the 440 bhp monster was nothing more than a standard turbo 2000 with a different back box of unknown origin.
As per ebay rules the item was far from as described so i pulled out of the deal, he then tried to cancel the transaction to avoid fees, which i also declined.
Nothing else he has accused me of is true i.e. writing things on walls which dont exist,some ramblings about his mrs and something involving traffic cops that know people and are going to come round and duff me up.
I knew he had no evidence of any of these things as they never occured hence the long drawn out thread where he managed to post time after time and avoid answering any question put to him like a labour m.p.
To sum up i would say he was the original owner who cant shift the heap.
Simon you made yourself look a **** as not only did you admit to owning that car but also amused everyone with your posts.
EPIC FAIL!!!
I was the winner of the original car when it was advertised on ebay sometime ago as being 440bhp and having 35k spent on it.
I had every intention of purchasing the car as it was only £1600,which is a bargain for a 440 bhp car and worth far more in parts.
On winning the auction i asked for proof of work done,which in the listing he said he had receipts for and it turned out he had no receipts at all and the 440 bhp monster was nothing more than a standard turbo 2000 with a different back box of unknown origin.
As per ebay rules the item was far from as described so i pulled out of the deal, he then tried to cancel the transaction to avoid fees, which i also declined.
Nothing else he has accused me of is true i.e. writing things on walls which dont exist,some ramblings about his mrs and something involving traffic cops that know people and are going to come round and duff me up.
I knew he had no evidence of any of these things as they never occured hence the long drawn out thread where he managed to post time after time and avoid answering any question put to him like a labour m.p.
To sum up i would say he was the original owner who cant shift the heap.
Simon you made yourself look a **** as not only did you admit to owning that car but also amused everyone with your posts.
EPIC FAIL!!!
Last edited by tubbytommy; 04 November 2011 at 08:58 AM.
04 November 2011, 09:48 AM
#167
I still have the original ebay ad saved in my purchase history as i dont think you can see it now in the original thread.
Ill post it up when i get home from work,as long as the police who know people in coventry don't pay me a visit.
Come back simon i miss you already. Don't be a one day only poster.Your car has created two excellent threads on scoobynet and for that we all thank you.
If you dont return stay safe at your murders,suicides and cats up trees.
Ill post it up when i get home from work,as long as the police who know people in coventry don't pay me a visit.
Come back simon i miss you already. Don't be a one day only poster.Your car has created two excellent threads on scoobynet and for that we all thank you.
If you dont return stay safe at your murders,suicides and cats up trees.
Last edited by tubbytommy; 04 November 2011 at 09:51 AM.
04 November 2011, 10:12 AM
#169
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, just to recap, as the grammar & spelling of our angry chum is making my eyes hurt:
TubbyTommy has upset the owner of a "modified" impreza. Also, he has been posting adverts for it on other sites.
Now the West Midlands Police want to duff Tommy up.
SimonRF seems to be more than one person. The one or more person using the account don't have the combined reading age of the average Sun reader, so maybe they are on half term & this is just a wind up?
TubbyTommy has upset the owner of a "modified" impreza. Also, he has been posting adverts for it on other sites.
Now the West Midlands Police want to duff Tommy up.
SimonRF seems to be more than one person. The one or more person using the account don't have the combined reading age of the average Sun reader, so maybe they are on half term & this is just a wind up?
"More person" should be plural "more person's" and instead of "don't have" you should have used the contraction "doesn't" or "does not".
Oh and Impreza should be capitalised as it's a name
04 November 2011, 10:23 AM
#171
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You know i think he has gone and left me no phone number.
I was the winner of the original car when it was advertised on ebay sometime ago as being 440bhp and having 35k spent on it.
I had every intention of purchasing the car as it was only £1600,which is a bargain for a 440 bhp car and worth far more in parts.
On winning the auction i asked for proof of work done,which in the listing he said he had receipts for and it turned out he had no receipts at all and the 440 bhp monster was nothing more than a standard turbo 2000 with a different back box of unknown origin.
As per ebay rules the item was far from as described so i pulled out of the deal, he then tried to cancel the transaction to avoid fees, which i also declined.
Nothing else he has accused me of is true i.e. writing things on walls which dont exist,some ramblings about his mrs and something involving traffic cops that know people and are going to come round and duff me up.
I knew he had no evidence of any of these things as they never occured hence the long drawn out thread where he managed to post time after time and avoid answering any question put to him like a labour m.p.
To sum up i would say he was the original owner who cant shift the heap.
Simon you made yourself look a **** as not only did you admit to owning that car but also amused everyone with your posts.
EPIC FAIL!!!
I was the winner of the original car when it was advertised on ebay sometime ago as being 440bhp and having 35k spent on it.
I had every intention of purchasing the car as it was only £1600,which is a bargain for a 440 bhp car and worth far more in parts.
On winning the auction i asked for proof of work done,which in the listing he said he had receipts for and it turned out he had no receipts at all and the 440 bhp monster was nothing more than a standard turbo 2000 with a different back box of unknown origin.
As per ebay rules the item was far from as described so i pulled out of the deal, he then tried to cancel the transaction to avoid fees, which i also declined.
Nothing else he has accused me of is true i.e. writing things on walls which dont exist,some ramblings about his mrs and something involving traffic cops that know people and are going to come round and duff me up.
I knew he had no evidence of any of these things as they never occured hence the long drawn out thread where he managed to post time after time and avoid answering any question put to him like a labour m.p.
To sum up i would say he was the original owner who cant shift the heap.
Simon you made yourself look a **** as not only did you admit to owning that car but also amused everyone with your posts.
EPIC FAIL!!!
I can understand the frustration with sellers claiming large bullsh*t bhp figures and how this can drive the price down on honest cars. You can report a listing as fraudulent and get it pulled without even placing a bid !
04 November 2011, 10:58 AM
#175
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04 November 2011, 11:12 AM
#176
911 C4 pilot
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In an Air Cooled Porsche
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do atleast have a decent level of English competence, I am able to use paragraphs, full stops and commas.
To correct you & myself further, I should have written:
The one, or more persons using the account do not have the combined reading age of the average Sun reader, so maybe they are on half term & this is just a wind up?
Obviously the school system in this country is failing a lot of children when they leave school with literacy levels that are abysmal. Attempting to read this "Monglish" hurts my brain.
