Should older people be "encouraged" to move out of their homes?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave
I think all kid breeding little chav bastards should be given one room only in a hostel. If you have any more kids the room would get more crowded thus discouraging uncontrolled breeding.
It's great this country isn't it? Most hard working people only have 2 kids because they can't afford/don't have the space to have more, Social security sponging teenagers/immigrants etc. just get a bigger house and bigger handouts.
It's great this country isn't it? Most hard working people only have 2 kids because they can't afford/don't have the space to have more, Social security sponging teenagers/immigrants etc. just get a bigger house and bigger handouts.
I think all kid breeding little chav bastards should be given one room only in a hostel. If you have any more kids the room would get more crowded thus discouraging uncontrolled breeding.
It's great this country isn't it? Most hard working people only have 2 kids because they can't afford/don't have the space to have more, Social security sponging teenagers/immigrants etc. just get a bigger house and bigger handouts.
It's great this country isn't it? Most hard working people only have 2 kids because they can't afford/don't have the space to have more, Social security sponging teenagers/immigrants etc. just get a bigger house and bigger handouts.

Its the usual moan on this one from me.
its the usual daily mail mis-guided article:
this is about welfare reform and purely social housing: not those in owner occupation.
some local authorities and housign assocations have approaching 60% under occupation in their stock.
building isn't viable, when the actual properties are available. but just under occupied.
also- all of us are paying via income tax to keep these people under occupying these homes.
when you check the stats: virtually all under occupation is by those on benefit.
the housing benefit bill alone is currently £18 billion.
now £9 billion was spent last yr on the police........ do you get the idea that something needs to be done.
bringing immigration into this is nonsense, the few that do end up in social housing are a finate percentage.
trust me, I'm involved in this directly !!
this is about welfare reform and purely social housing: not those in owner occupation.
some local authorities and housign assocations have approaching 60% under occupation in their stock.
building isn't viable, when the actual properties are available. but just under occupied.
also- all of us are paying via income tax to keep these people under occupying these homes.
when you check the stats: virtually all under occupation is by those on benefit.
the housing benefit bill alone is currently £18 billion.
now £9 billion was spent last yr on the police........ do you get the idea that something needs to be done.
bringing immigration into this is nonsense, the few that do end up in social housing are a finate percentage.
trust me, I'm involved in this directly !!
Also, IF quote in their "Notes for Editors:" that (item 2) - "This is because home ownership among the under 35s is falling faster than it is rising for the over 65s, figures from the English Housing Survey show."
..."ownership", not rental. Indeed ownership seems to crop up quite a lot in their press release!
mb
...so why is one of the IFs suggestions that "Measures could include an exemption from stamp duty for the over 60s when they move to a smaller property.". Someone in rented accommodation (especially if it is subsidised) would be unlikely to afford the £50K deposit on a (smaller) house, even without stamp duty.
Also, IF quote in their "Notes for Editors:" that (item 2) - "This is because home ownership among the under 35s is falling faster than it is rising for the over 65s, figures from the English Housing Survey show."
..."ownership", not rental. Indeed ownership seems to crop up quite a lot in their press release!
mb
Also, IF quote in their "Notes for Editors:" that (item 2) - "This is because home ownership among the under 35s is falling faster than it is rising for the over 65s, figures from the English Housing Survey show."
..."ownership", not rental. Indeed ownership seems to crop up quite a lot in their press release!
mb
Scooby Regular

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
From: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Someone at the BBC obvioulsy has a bee in thier bonnet about this
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15400477
Barely a mention of council houses in this one either Austin, I would suggest that the one holding the wrong end of the stick is you
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15400477
Barely a mention of council houses in this one either Austin, I would suggest that the one holding the wrong end of the stick is you
I don't think its right at all trying to move the elderly out of their homes just because its got an extra room. It is their homes, their security/safe place, its pretty disgusting in my opinion. I know that if my Granny was made to give up her home it would devastate her completely.
There is a vast difference between a house and a home and the people who think up these rediculous ideas need to remember this.
Instead of threatening people out of their homes how about the government stimulate young workers to move out of their parents home. I'm 25 and I would say the majority of people I know at my age, live at home, not because they can't afford to move out but because they can't afford miss out on going drinking every weekend, owning flash cars and basically having monumental amounts of disposible cash. Get the younger folk to man up and start giving back instead of bullying the elderly.
There is a vast difference between a house and a home and the people who think up these rediculous ideas need to remember this.
Instead of threatening people out of their homes how about the government stimulate young workers to move out of their parents home. I'm 25 and I would say the majority of people I know at my age, live at home, not because they can't afford to move out but because they can't afford miss out on going drinking every weekend, owning flash cars and basically having monumental amounts of disposible cash. Get the younger folk to man up and start giving back instead of bullying the elderly.
I don't think its right at all trying to move the elderly out of their homes just because its got an extra room. It is their homes, their security/safe place, its pretty disgusting in my opinion. I know that if my Granny was made to give up her home it would devastate her completely.
There is a vast difference between a house and a home and the people who think up these rediculous ideas need to remember this.
Instead of threatening people out of their homes how about the government stimulate young workers to move out of their parents home. I'm 25 and I would say the majority of people I know at my age, live at home, not because they can't afford to move out but because they can't afford miss out on going drinking every weekend, owning flash cars and basically having monumental amounts of disposible cash. Get the younger folk to man up and start giving back instead of bullying the elderly.
There is a vast difference between a house and a home and the people who think up these rediculous ideas need to remember this.
Instead of threatening people out of their homes how about the government stimulate young workers to move out of their parents home. I'm 25 and I would say the majority of people I know at my age, live at home, not because they can't afford to move out but because they can't afford miss out on going drinking every weekend, owning flash cars and basically having monumental amounts of disposible cash. Get the younger folk to man up and start giving back instead of bullying the elderly.

If the gov't had any money then they could consider contributing to the cost of a home for first time buyers. Say give 25% of cost with no or minimal interest and get money back when property sold. That would make homes more affordable and be an incentive for house builders.
And if Granny wants to stay in her 6 room pad then more fool her but it's her home ffs and nothing to do with big bloody interfering brother.
dl
If the gov't had any money then they could consider contributing to the cost of a home for first time buyers. Say give 25% of cost with no or minimal interest and get money back when property sold. That would make homes more affordable and be an incentive for house builders.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
From: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Can anyone please point out to me what the occupant's age has to do with anything?
My wife and I are in our 30's and own a home which might be considered "large" by some metrics. If we wanted to downsize, why shouldn't we be eligible for exactly the same incentive benefit as anyone else?
I thought age discrimination was generally regarded as a bad thing, if not actually illegal?
My wife and I are in our 30's and own a home which might be considered "large" by some metrics. If we wanted to downsize, why shouldn't we be eligible for exactly the same incentive benefit as anyone else?
I thought age discrimination was generally regarded as a bad thing, if not actually illegal?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
serpico
ScoobyNet General
20
Apr 1, 2019 07:47 AM



...

