Notices
Trader Announcements Announcements (including special offers, product/service information) made by Authorised Advertisers

Another stroker build.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 10:01 PM
  #31  
gus sti8's Avatar
gus sti8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: sheffield my03 sti 600ish/540ish
Default


Bit of a update....
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 10:32 PM
  #32  
99greenwagon's Avatar
99greenwagon
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gus sti8
That's just the start mate my my03 sti owes me 30k plus and still don't run......

holy ****!
have you won the lottery?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 12:23 AM
  #33  
Martin typeR's Avatar
Martin typeR
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Jeffery
2.1 with everything needed engine wise for 500 bhp £4500 drive in drive out.
That's a new 79 mm crank, Wiseco pistons, K1 rods, ACL Race bearings, ARP studs, RCM oil pump, Cosworth head gaskets and sump baffle.
It includes heads overhauled, fully balanced assembly etc.
Also the first 50 miles of running in.
You could leave everything else as it is, then come back later on, add the kit and let it rip!
How much would it be if you built it into a CDB supplied by yourselves?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 07:10 AM
  #34  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Originally Posted by Martin typeR
How much would it be if you built it into a CDB supplied by yourselves?
We have a couple going right now at £600 inc vat, plus rear thrust machining at £150 inc vat. They are fully refurbished and pristine clean.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 07:51 AM
  #35  
Camoscooby's Avatar
Camoscooby
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
From: Dover, Kent
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Day
hmmmmmm need more power
Me too
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 08:39 AM
  #36  
gus sti8's Avatar
gus sti8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: sheffield my03 sti 600ish/540ish
Default

Anyone thinking of dealing with Alan will not be disappointed a truly honest n genuine person.......
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 08:41 AM
  #37  
gus sti8's Avatar
gus sti8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: sheffield my03 sti 600ish/540ish
Default

Originally Posted by 99greenwagon

holy ****!
have you won the lottery?
I wish lol
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 10:58 AM
  #38  
duncatr's Avatar
duncatr
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
I'm sure Bigarf will confirm just how fragile 2.5's can be...

But a 2.35 is going to be superb. Tough enough for 700+.

dunx

P.S. I'm a cheapskate so it's 501 bhp for mine...
Thats not really the full picture though is it?
The power rating of any block will also be determined by the internals. In many cases more so than the cc.
Yes there are limitations on the casings but its not really relevent to compare the limitation of a block by saying a EJ22 based 2.35 build engine is good for 700+
Good quality big BHP capable rods in a built EJ20 and lesser quality rods in an EJ22 based 2.35 and see which one makes the most power safely without going pop!

The main advantage has to be spool. EJ22 CDB based 2.35 is a winner because its proved to be reliable at high power levels.

2.1 is popular as it works out only a little more expensive than building a 2.0 but with the added extra cc. And if built into a CDB (which go for ~£300) then thay are very strong assuming good internals used.

I opted for 2.1 CDB myself as the cost was way lower than the CDB EJ22 based 2.35. Even just the bare block its self - £300 v £1100

I think thats the real strength of the 2.1 - It can be built for sensible money with decent internals and easily handle mid 500's with good spool.

Of course they can be made to take more power but at the cost of spool as is always the case when moving up the power band.

All just in my humble opinion of course
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 11:06 AM
  #39  
gus sti8's Avatar
gus sti8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: sheffield my03 sti 600ish/540ish
Default

It's more stroke that aids spool over a overbored engine
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 11:36 AM
  #40  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Originally Posted by duncatr
Thats not really the full picture though is it?
The power rating of any block will also be determined by the internals. In many cases more so than the cc.
Yes there are limitations on the casings but its not really relevent to compare the limitation of a block by saying a EJ22 based 2.35 build engine is good for 700+
Good quality big BHP capable rods in a built EJ20 and lesser quality rods in an EJ22 based 2.35 and see which one makes the most power safely without going pop!

The main advantage has to be spool. EJ22 CDB based 2.35 is a winner because its proved to be reliable at high power levels.

2.1 is popular as it works out only a little more expensive than building a 2.0 but with the added extra cc. And if built into a CDB (which go for ~£300) then thay are very strong assuming good internals used.

I opted for 2.1 CDB myself as the cost was way lower than the CDB EJ22 based 2.35. Even just the bare block its self - £300 v £1100

I think thats the real strength of the 2.1 - It can be built for sensible money with decent internals and easily handle mid 500's with good spool.

Of course they can be made to take more power but at the cost of spool as is always the case when moving up the power band.

All just in my humble opinion of course
Nothing wrong with any of those statements.
The other issue is cylinder head flow. We've found for what we'd call a mid range build (450/500 bhp) the 2.1 gives much better overall power figures and revs out very well compared to a 2.5, which is more about torque.
Reply
Old May 7, 2011 | 09:53 PM
  #41  
Hongkongfooi's Avatar
Hongkongfooi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Eastbourne
Default

Originally Posted by gus sti8
That's just the start mate my my03 sti owes me 30k plus and still don't run......
When it's finished.....that's good value as what else woul you get for the performance on tap!
Good luck matey
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 10:40 AM
  #42  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

It's a very nice project, Gus doesn't appear to have missed much!
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 10:48 AM
  #43  
wrx9181's Avatar
wrx9181
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,160
Likes: 3
From: South Yorkshire
Default

Wa Wa we Wa
Need a better paying job
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 11:00 AM
  #44  
gus sti8's Avatar
gus sti8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: sheffield my03 sti 600ish/540ish
Default

Bit more of a taster for you

Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 12:39 PM
  #45  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

Originally Posted by duncatr
Thats not really the full picture though is it?
The power rating of any block will also be determined by the internals. In many cases more so than the cc.
Yes there are limitations on the casings but its not really relevent to compare the limitation of a block by saying a EJ22 based 2.35 build engine is good for 700+
Good quality big BHP capable rods in a built EJ20 and lesser quality rods in an EJ22 based 2.35 and see which one makes the most power safely without going pop!

The main advantage has to be spool. EJ22 CDB based 2.35 is a winner because its proved to be reliable at high power levels.

2.1 is popular as it works out only a little more expensive than building a 2.0 but with the added extra cc. And if built into a CDB (which go for ~£300) then thay are very strong assuming good internals used.

I opted for 2.1 CDB myself as the cost was way lower than the CDB EJ22 based 2.35. Even just the bare block its self - £300 v £1100

I think thats the real strength of the 2.1 - It can be built for sensible money with decent internals and easily handle mid 500's with good spool.

Of course they can be made to take more power but at the cost of spool as is always the case when moving up the power band.

All just in my humble opinion of course
I'm not here to bad mouth any Subaru engine builders, and it's not my place to talk about Bigarf's unpleasant experiences... of poorly built 2.5 motors.

But his 650 bhp Enginetuner motor has only needed maintaining despite being leathered to hell and laughing at it !

I suppose you will be astounded that A.J. is currently doing the heads for my 2.1 build.

dunx

P.S. IMHO the cost of the internals is within reason almost identical, the extra costs are in ensuring the structural integrity of the block, EJ22T or pinned 2.5.

P.P.S. A.J. I had a visit from Bez ( Tim B. ) in his 2.5 Engintuner powered Hawkeye last night, he's a very happy chap !

Last edited by dunx; May 8, 2011 at 12:43 PM.
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 06:41 PM
  #46  
dazdavies's Avatar
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,066
Likes: 85
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by gus sti8
Have still been failures and bore distortion...
On pinned 2.5's?

Show me one. Link?
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 06:53 PM
  #47  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
I'm not here to bad mouth any Subaru engine builders, and it's not my place to talk about Bigarf's unpleasant experiences... of poorly built 2.5 motors.

But his 650 bhp Enginetuner motor has only needed maintaining despite being leathered to hell and laughing at it !

I suppose you will be astounded that A.J. is currently doing the heads for my 2.1 build.

dunx

P.S. IMHO the cost of the internals is within reason almost identical, the extra costs are in ensuring the structural integrity of the block, EJ22T or pinned 2.5.

P.P.S. A.J. I had a visit from Bez ( Tim B. ) in his 2.5 Engintuner powered Hawkeye last night, he's a very happy chap !
Excellent!
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 08:03 AM
  #48  
MRSIMPSON's Avatar
MRSIMPSON
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 504
Likes: 1
From: South London
Default

Looks brand new? Is that a cleaned block, or new?
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 09:38 AM
  #49  
gus sti8's Avatar
gus sti8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: sheffield my03 sti 600ish/540ish
Default

Originally Posted by MRSIMPSON
Looks brand new? Is that a cleaned block, or new?
No it's used
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 02:08 PM
  #50  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Originally Posted by MRSIMPSON
Looks brand new? Is that a cleaned block, or new?
We try to make them all like that, inside and out!
Reply
Old May 14, 2011 | 10:52 AM
  #51  
duncatr's Avatar
duncatr
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
I'm not here to bad mouth any Subaru engine builders, and it's not my place to talk about Bigarf's unpleasant experiences... of poorly built 2.5 motors.

But his 650 bhp Enginetuner motor has only needed maintaining despite being leathered to hell and laughing at it !

I suppose you will be astounded that A.J. is currently doing the heads for my 2.1 build.

dunx

P.S. IMHO the cost of the internals is within reason almost identical, the extra costs are in ensuring the structural integrity of the block, EJ22T or pinned 2.5.

P.P.S. A.J. I had a visit from Bez ( Tim B. ) in his 2.5 Engintuner powered Hawkeye last night, he's a very happy chap !
You have sort of lost me on that reply and why I have been quoted in there.

I was not reffering to anyones car in particular or bad mouthing AJ in any way. I have spoken to Alan on more than one occasion and indeed considered getting him to supply and build my 2.1 stroker until I made a deal with another well known supplier.

Any build is only as good as the components used and the care and expertise taken to build not just the short block but indeed the complete engine and then of course the mapping.

You are moving on to a completely different topic here. I was speaking about how internals are the limiting factor for max safe power and not cc. We only need to look at the RCM gobstopper for that. Its a 2.0 AFAIK.

There are limitations to casings but as Daz says things can be done such as pinning. The limiting factor is still the internals. Clearly all internals are not the same both in ratings and price.

Its very easy to spend silly money on these cars as I'm sure we are all aware LOL, so I try and have a logical approach.
The intended use, planed power figures, planned rev limit etc and budget all need to come into play when selecting engine spec.
If I was to look at building an 800+BHP track only car I would use different internals than if I were looking at building a 500BHP road car and ultimately it would cost more for the higher spec car.

Likewise I would consider which block to use based on what I had to spend. Average price for EJ22T casings is £1,100. A complete 2.1 stroker buit short engine in an EJ20 CDB is about £3,000 all built and ready to fit.
Thats why the 2.1 has proved so popular, Alan him self has put a fair amount of them on the road

Could spend ages going on and on but think I have cleared up what I meant. LOL.
Reply
Old May 14, 2011 | 06:05 PM
  #52  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

With the greatest of respect...

Who would put chocolate pistons into an EJ22T ( apart from Subaru UK ) ?

The bottom line is that all the parts used have to be suitable for the targeted use, and power/torque requirements. BUT the easiest part to break is a 2.5 block... IMHO.

Anyway, I think we are dancing round a handbag now, so I'm off...

dunx
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #53  
Grant74's Avatar
Grant74
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Default

Looks amazing- if the kids go to sleep early enough I may put one for sale on ebay to see if I can get enough for a similar build

Slightly off topic, but are there any graphs comparing a 2.0 and 2.1 with the same turbo etc?
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 04:31 PM
  #54  
duncatr's Avatar
duncatr
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
the easiest part to break is a 2.5 block... IMHO.

Anyway, I think we are dancing round a handbag now, so I'm off...

dunx
No issues here - I love a good debate.
Never been much good at Dancing though. 2 left feet.

And I don't disagree with the 2.5 comment for a built engine.
EJ22T or EJ20 CDB all the way. Wish I could justify the extra cost from the 2.1

Peace.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 07:38 AM
  #55  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

Originally Posted by Grant74
Looks amazing- if the kids go to sleep early enough I may put one for sale on ebay to see if I can get enough for a similar build

Slightly off topic, but are there any graphs comparing a 2.0 and 2.1 with the same turbo etc?
Don't have many back to back, as most that arrive are dead before we begin our work. Have a nice example of what a 2.1 can do on a measly TD04, stock injectors, 3 inch exhaust and a topmount though.



Martyn
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 06:19 PM
  #56  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

Oi Alan, stop lurking and tell me when to send this grubby STI lump down there...

Seriously... when are your guys on holiday ?
As I'd like to be a pedestrian for as short a period as possible

Is it next month, or September ?

Regards,

dunx
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 09:29 PM
  #57  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
Oi Alan, stop lurking and tell me when to send this grubby STI lump down there...

Seriously... when are your guys on holiday ?
As I'd like to be a pedestrian for as short a period as possible

Is it next month, or September ?

Regards,

dunx
If anybody is off next month I'll throw a wobbly. Drop it off in two weeks?
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 09:02 PM
  #58  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

You not picking it up ?

I'm away with work till 29th. Will see if Bigarf will drag it out whilst I'm away

dunx

P.S. Had a chat with Bez, and his support group last night, he is a very happy lad... they were less happy after 19 hours on the road...

Last edited by dunx; May 21, 2011 at 09:40 AM.
Reply
Old May 20, 2011 | 10:40 PM
  #59  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
You not picking it up ?

I'm away with work till 29th. Will see if Bigarf will drag it out whilst I'm away

dunx

P.S. Had a chat with Bez, and his support group last night, he is a very happy lad... they were less happy after 11 hours on the road...
Of course I'll fetch it, I thought you wanted to drop in for a visit!
Yes, the chaps had a lousy run down here due to a Focus exiting stage left at 4 in the morning on the A38. They seemed to enjoy the day out apart from that!
Reply
Old May 21, 2011 | 06:01 AM
  #60  
gussy's Avatar
gussy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,536
Likes: 7
From: oop north in a spec-c.Now sold and starting on a classic ra track/sprint/road car
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
You not picking it up ?

I'm away with work till 29th. Will see if Bigarf will drag it out whilst I'm away

dunx

P.S. Had a chat with Bez, and his support group last night, he is a very happy lad... they were less happy after 11 hours on the road...
Dunx I spoke to Bez yesterday he seems well chuffed with his build and excellent numbers cant wait to see it out on sunday.
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:43 PM.