Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Judaism

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:21 PM
  #61  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

Im afraid the 'partitioning' was as much strategic as anything , only partly orchestrated by a rather ineffectual foreign minister ( one of my forbears )
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:28 PM
  #62  
scud8's Avatar
scud8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
The right don't hold the balance of power. How is it the Israeli state has used force to remove thousands of setters in the recent past as part of their unilateral disengagement plan? They removed 21 settlements in the West Bank and 4 in the Gaza strip.
Both Shas and Jewish Home are part of the current coalition government in Israel. Shas has recently joined the World Zionist Organisation and while they do not support settlements in the West Bank they believe all of Jerusalem should be part of the Israeli state. Jewish Home are an ultra right-wing religious party who believe all Palestistians should be removed to Jordan.

Sharon's action withdrawing from Gaza was admirable (I guess he developed a conscience in later life with all the blood on his hands), but otherwise Israel's actions against illegal settlements have been extremely half-hearted and usually the result of the American's holding their hand to the fire. Recent settlement activity around Jerusalem seems designed to thwart any hopes of peace - it's difficult to see it having any legitimate purpose.
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #63  
Mus's Avatar
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
From: will be back in another scooby in time....
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I never said America doesn't do wrong. Please...

I've admitted that the settler issue is a real one. Israel are not perfect.

As to why Israel has more land than it should have had under the British plan then ask the Arab states why they went to war with Israel and in doing so displaced the refugees?

Many are still in refugee camps with the Arab countries refusing to let them out or be resettled etc. Why is that?

BTW the 'Palestinians' never had 'their' land as a state anyway. In fact there is no such thing as a discrete Palestinian people. The Ottomans never even called it Palestine! It was just a part of their Empire.
the reason the Arabs went to war was to try and get back some of the land back, there other reasons too like the channel ect.

why should other Arabs let then settle when it's not there country, but to be fair there is a lot of palistinians living and SETTELED in other Arab countries. I'm aware of the palistinain refugees in lebanon. but lebanon isn't that far ahead in terms of the government, benefits ect. so they can't offer much tothe palistinain people.

they wasnt recognised by you but in the Arab world it's still recognised as palistine.

the utter rubbish the politicians speak makes me sick the truth is right there in your face yet the politians still lie. politicians are simply salesmen.



look at Cyprus for instance me and you can fly direct to the Greek side but not Turkish side. and the Greek cypriot currency is stronger than the pound. I've been Cyprus three times, nothing there but donkeys and small villages afew clubs and that's it. they export nothing more than Greek yoghurt and water melons and the occasional halomi cheese lovely place. yet there currency is stronger than the pound.


this world is messes up cause people like you don't ask the question they believe what ever they fed in the media. sorry if i sound harsh just in a bad mood after watching Gordon ramseys shark bate
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:45 PM
  #64  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scud8
Both Shas and Jewish Home are part of the current coalition government in Israel. Shas has recently joined the World Zionist Organisation and while they do not support settlements in the West Bank they believe all of Jerusalem should be part of the Israeli state. Jewish Home are an ultra right-wing religious party who believe all Palestistians should be removed to Jordan.

Sharon's action withdrawing from Gaza was admirable (I guess he developed a conscience in later life with all the blood on his hands), but otherwise Israel's actions against illegal settlements have been extremely half-hearted and usually the result of the American's holding their hand to the fire. Recent settlement activity around Jerusalem seems designed to thwart any hopes of peace - it's difficult to see it having any legitimate purpose.
So Arafat rejecting the 95% offer was not an obstacle to peace and same for the current Palies not even knowing what they want (Hamas wants full conquest!).

Agreeing to the two state solution would have put massive pressure, domestic and international - on the settlers and the extreme right. As it is you have one half of the Palies (Hamas preaching full ethnic cleansing) so you may ask why should the extreme settlers not go ahead and do what they want?
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 11:49 PM
  #65  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mus

why should other Arabs let then settle when it's not there country
Are you going to leave the UK?

How about the Albanians in Kosova? They have their own nation now at the expense of the Serbs.

Originally Posted by Mus
the utter rubbish the politicians speak makes me sick the truth is right there in your face yet the politians still lie. politicians are simply salesmen.
True yet you seem to support the Politicians of Hezzbollah, Iran etc. They are even bigger liars.


Originally Posted by Mus
look at Cyprus for instance me and you can fly direct to the Greek side but not Turkish side. and the Greek cypriot currency is stronger than the pound. I've been Cyprus three times, nothing there but donkeys and small villages afew clubs and that's it. they export nothing more than Greek yoghurt and water melons and the occasional halomi cheese lovely place. yet there currency is stronger than the pound.
So how do you justify the Turkish invasion? Where is the protest?
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 12:07 AM
  #66  
Mus's Avatar
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
From: will be back in another scooby in time....
Default

I knew i should of edited the first comment or event elaborated a bit more, the Arabs are next door neighbours of palistine and most of the countries around there are strigling anyway so how can they support the palistinians too.

lebanon doesnt even have nhs out there? Syria is has no money they are broke there currency is worthless. the Turks speak a different language. would you live under sadam in Iraq when he was around??


hizzballah aren't politicians there a group of people who are fighting against the oppression. I don't agree with a lot of things they do but I'm sure they wouldn't e around If palistine wasn't oppressed.

me leave the uk You crazy this is my country now as I contribute to it and I built my life here. but to be fair I've thought about leaving yes with government taking **** with prices rising for everything.

how do you justify they bigger liars when they sat inter own homes and some **** sucker went there and accused them of having weapons of mass destructions. wheres the weapons that bush went in to Iraq for. bush clearly went in for oil so who's the lied now????????!!!??????
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 12:13 AM
  #67  
Jamie's Avatar
Jamie
Super Muppet
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 33,365
Likes: 0
From: Inside out
Default

Mus, do what i do just sit up a tree and watch as this thread will soon go on and on like the ariston adverts it will soon break and everyone will argue!
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 12:50 AM
  #68  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mus
hizzballah aren't politicians there a group of people who are fighting against the oppression. I don't agree with a lot of things they do but I'm sure they wouldn't e around If palistine wasn't oppressed.
Oppression of who? The Lebanese or Palestinians? They are Lebanese right?

You don't believe America 'liberated' the Iraqis for selfless/altruistic reasons, so why do you believe Hezzbollah?

Hezzbollah like any new organisation with a political elite want power. They use the Palestinians as a reason to sieze power, the take control of South Lebanon on the basis they are 'defending against Israel'. Without Israel they would have no way to convince people that they were necessary...no reason for being in the Lebanese. They tell the Lebanese that Israel is a danger and by the way we will sieze power and push our political ideology through which just happens to mean our Leadership acquire massive local POLITICAL POWER.

They have to keep the conflict going or the Lebanese would realise they have no use for them, why else kidnap IDF soldiers and start a war? Only point is to keep the conflict going....it was entirely POLITICAL which is why I say the are politicians.

Last edited by tony de wonderful; Jan 17, 2011 at 12:53 AM.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 05:27 PM
  #69  
scud8's Avatar
scud8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
So Arafat rejecting the 95% offer was not an obstacle to peace and same for the current Palies not even knowing what they want (Hamas wants full conquest!).

Agreeing to the two state solution would have put massive pressure, domestic and international - on the settlers and the extreme right. As it is you have one half of the Palies (Hamas preaching full ethnic cleansing) so you may ask why should the extreme settlers not go ahead and do what they want?
As I've already said, the Palestinian leadership have not helped the peace process (and IMHO have done their people a massive disservice), but I don't see any of this as justification for Israel riding rough-shod over international law and UN resolutions by continuing to build on occupied territory.

If Hamas and Fatah both agreed to recognise the existence of the Israeli state according to the pre-1967 boundaries would this be enough to get Israel's agreement to a Palestinian state with the reciprocal boundaries? It should be if Israeli rhetoric is to be believed, but it will never happen because Netanyahu is reliant on Zionist parties to hold his coalition together. Even Sharon couldn't force through the total settlement freeze which was a pre-condition of the first phase of the 2002 peace plan.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 05:44 PM
  #70  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
15 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Fair enough but I notice we you and Mus this is that standard reply when you run out of arguments in the debate.

You cling to this view of the conflict because it is what you WANT to see. You want to imagine it's this good vs evil....Palies are eternal victims and oppressed...Israel the cartoon bad guy. Black and white. It's just a piece of theater to you.
Tony do me a favour, don't feel qualified to comment on what I may or may not think. For the record I have not run out of arguments but I'm not going to waste time pontificating with you.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 05:53 PM
  #71  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Hey Tony instead of telling everyone else what they think why not answer my question so we know what and how you think?

I am thinking the multiple choice answers are going to have to be given to you soon.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 05:58 PM
  #72  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
15 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Hey Tony instead of telling everyone else what they think why not answer my question so we know what and how you think?

I am thinking the multiple choice answers are going to have to be given to you soon.
I can only presume he's a Zionist.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 06:21 PM
  #73  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Hey Tony instead of telling everyone else what they think why not answer my question so we know what and how you think?

I am thinking the multiple choice answers are going to have to be given to you soon.
Sure, to annoy you.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 06:27 PM
  #74  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
Tony do me a favour, don't feel qualified to comment on what I may or may not think. For the record I have not run out of arguments but I'm not going to waste time pontificating with you.
What is the point in posting if you are not going to debate?
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 07:16 PM
  #75  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
15 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
What is the point in posting if you are not going to debate?
I have no qualms about debating. However your viewpoint is set in stone and debating is a fruitless pursuit.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 07:23 PM
  #76  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
What is the point in posting if you are not going to debate?
By the sheer amount of threads you post "seeking debate" I would have to hypothesise that you are a prolific mass debater, in fact the most widespread mass debater SNet has ever known
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:21 PM
  #77  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
I have no qualms about debating. However your viewpoint is set in stone and debating is a fruitless pursuit.
I make my positions known based on reason and argument. You otoh in reply to my series of points and arguments just say 'oh well I disagree'. It just shows the weakness of your position....not based on reason just emotion.

Just saying.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:33 PM
  #78  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
15 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I make my positions known based on reason and argument. You otoh in reply to my series of points and arguments just say 'oh well I disagree'. It just shows the weakness of your position....not based on reason just emotion.

Just saying.
Your position is based on rigorous assertion of 'facts' according to you. You use red herrings when your argument is without basis and position compromised. You cannot answer a straight question. Yet you consider my position weak.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:34 PM
  #79  
Trout's Avatar
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

That Jesus bloke, he was Jewish.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:43 PM
  #80  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
15 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by Trout
That Jesus bloke, he was Jewish.
Jesus was a black man!
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:45 PM
  #81  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
Your position is based on rigorous assertion of 'facts' according to you. You use red herrings when your argument is without basis and position compromised. You cannot answer a straight question. Yet you consider my position weak.
I can't refute that because you are not referring to specifics.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:45 PM
  #82  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
15 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

No Jesus was Batman.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:49 PM
  #83  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
15 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I can't refute that because you are not referring to specifics.

You know that makes you sound like a robot.

Computer says no!
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 09:12 PM
  #84  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
You know that makes you sound like a robot.

Computer says no!
Look you have taken some historical half truths (Jewish people owned 7% prior to 1948), and then projected your own idea of 'justice' onto the conflict on behalf of the Palestinians.

A conflict which is nothing to do with you and never asked you to stick your oar in.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 09:25 PM
  #85  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
15 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Look you have taken some historical half truths (Jewish people owned 7% prior to 1948), and then projected your own idea of 'justice' onto the conflict on behalf of the Palestinians.

A conflict which is nothing to do with you and never asked you to stick your oar in.
Oh the irony.
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 09:26 PM
  #86  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
Oh the irony.
He really is numb as f**k isn't he?
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 09:49 PM
  #87  
Will's Avatar
Will
BANNED
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,641
Likes: 0
From: Bumming sheep, hard!
Default

F*ck me!!! Mods,'regardless of the mong being a payd member
, please ban the cunt. Tony please **** off with your drivel. I'm sick and tired of seeing your user name and crap posts/threads!!
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 09:51 PM
  #88  
nick172sport's Avatar
nick172sport
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,594
Likes: 0
From: on sunny ibiza ocean beach
Default

Originally Posted by mr_impreza
F*ck me!!! Mods,'regardless of the mong being a payd member
, please ban the cunt. Tony please **** off with your drivel. I'm sick and tired of seeing your user name and crap posts/threads!!
get in fight club sheep lover your soft now ill have to induct you again its bin that long and you miss paul
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 10:02 PM
  #89  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Look you have taken some historical half truths (Jewish people owned 7% prior to 1948), and then projected your own idea of 'justice' onto the conflict on behalf of the Palestinians.

A conflict which is nothing to do with you and never asked you to stick your oar in.
You are just an apologist for a sick brutal and morally bankrupt regime, the majority of the population having been bused in from the former iron curtain countries in the last 20 years - who seem quite at ease shooting and bulldozing (and cluster bombing) innocent civilians



They have no more right to settle in the region than I have to claim a part of kazakhstan as my own
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 10:17 PM
  #90  
JTaylor's Avatar
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
From: Home
Default

Originally Posted by mr_impreza
F*ck me!!! Mods,'regardless of the mong being a payd member
, please ban the cunt. Tony please **** off with your drivel. I'm sick and tired of seeing your user name and crap posts/threads!!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 AM.