Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Islamic face-veil part of 'British way of life'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 October 2010, 10:04 PM
  #61  
Glowplug
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Glowplug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On The Road!
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mouse555
Edd - I do have a complaint about a Chinese man!

I traded a car in at a garage, the garage sold the car to the aforementioned chinese man who then went through numerous speed cameras and parked illegally all over Cambridge. The result was that I was nearly disqualified from driving and had various threats etc from Camb City Council about non-payment of fines and enforcemant procedures. I know that the garage shoulder some of the responsibility but if the chinese man had registered the car to himself then none of it would have happened.

So as to stay in keeping with the thread though, he was probably a muslim who was wearing the veil when he committed all of the offences
And if you had filled in the V5 and sent it to DVLA as is your responsibility...
Old 16 October 2010, 10:17 PM
  #62  
belliott69
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
belliott69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: www.surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it has no place in this country, as has already been pointed out, if i walk down the street with a balaclava on i would be forced to take it off or arrested.
Old 16 October 2010, 11:36 PM
  #63  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by belliott69
it has no place in this country, as has already been pointed out, if i walk down the street with a balaclava on i would be forced to take it off or arrested.
Please tell me which law says you can't wear a balaclava in public?
Old 16 October 2010, 11:43 PM
  #64  
belliott69
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
belliott69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: www.surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

public disoder act maybe, scaring people into thinking i was a robber.
Old 16 October 2010, 11:44 PM
  #65  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Who said I had a 'feeling'?

What I said was an intellectualisation.

Any intellectualisation is subjective and therefore makes it no different to a 'feeling'. Just giving it the term 'intellectualisation' does not actually make it free from emotional and irrational bias, far from it.

So I ask you again, do you have an inferiority complex? Do you believe all these people are making a statement to you and the 'mainstream' (of which you must be a part) that they are better than you?
Old 16 October 2010, 11:46 PM
  #66  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by belliott69
public disoder act maybe, scaring people into thinking i was a robber.

1) Public disoder act? What's that? Not using deodorant??

2) Scaring people into thinking you are a robber? That's a law is it? You've actually heard of that law have you?

Belliot, stop being a Bellend
Old 16 October 2010, 11:51 PM
  #67  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Personally I find the wearing of a veil quite odd and disconcerting. But that's probably my problem not theirs.

But I'm entirely unconvinced of the point banning it. I don't think this would do any good at all. Simply fuel more us versus them sentiment

I do agree however that if you work in an environment where you have to intimately interact with people you should not wear a veil.
Old 16 October 2010, 11:55 PM
  #68  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not answering on TDW's behalf but would like to offer my own rationalisation which is this: the wearing of a burkha is a symbolic opposition to the Enlightenment derived, liberal principles upon which my country (and that of our cousins in Europe and America) are based. My view is that burkha wearing screams 'I'm fundamentally different to you'. One can only assume that those that engage in this kind of posturing do so in the belief that their position is superior.
Old 17 October 2010, 12:00 AM
  #69  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
I'm not answering on TDW's behalf but would like to offer my own rationalisation which is this: the wearing of a burkha is a symbolic opposition to the Enlightenment derived, liberal principles upon which my country (and that of our cousins in Europe and America) are based. My view is that burkha wearing screams 'I'm fundamentally different to you'. One can only assume that those that engage in this kind of posturing do so in the belief that their position is superior.
Interesting. What does it say about enlightenment when 14 year old girls walk down the road in mini skirts and see through tops then? I find that just as odd as I do the Burkha, but if that's what they (and their parents) want to do that's their choice. It's fundamentally different to what I think is right but I don't believe they are posturing at me saying they are superior because they can expose more flesh
Old 17 October 2010, 12:03 AM
  #70  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
I'm not answering on TDW's behalf but would like to offer my own rationalisation which is this: the wearing of a burkha is a symbolic opposition to the Enlightenment derived, liberal principles upon which my country (and that of our cousins in Europe and America) are based. My view is that burkha wearing screams 'I'm fundamentally different to you'. One can only assume that those that engage in this kind of posturing do so in the belief that their position is superior.

Would you mind explaining (please I keep on asking but to no effect) what you mean by 'Enlightenment', especially as you continually capitalise the E?
Old 17 October 2010, 12:06 AM
  #71  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Personally I find the wearing of a veil quite odd and disconcerting. But that's probably my problem not theirs.

But I'm entirely unconvinced of the point banning it. I don't think this would do any good at all. Simply fuel more us versus them sentiment
.
Doing nothing is incendiary. Banning the practice says this: enough's enough, we do not tolerate what this practice stands for, we will not tolerate proliferation of your ideology in this country.

I genuinely admire your inclusive outlook, Martin, but fear that you are an apologist for a force that would, given the opportunity, crush liberal philosophy in an instant.
Old 17 October 2010, 12:11 AM
  #72  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Doing nothing is incendiary. Banning the practice says this: enough's enough, we do not tolerate what this practice stands for, we will not tolerate proliferation of your ideology in this country.

I genuinely admire your inclusive outlook, Martin, but fear that you are an apologist for a force that would, given the opportunity, crush liberal philosophy in an instant.
But surely banning an item of clothing is some way down the list of things that should be banned? How about...

Guns
Knives
Dangerous Dogs
Writing the word 'England' on an England flag
Old 17 October 2010, 12:12 AM
  #73  
Hysteria1983
Scooby Regular
 
Hysteria1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wolverhampton!!!
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know that embracing religion in a society these days isn't common, but at least the women who wear this garment are not scared to say I am faithfull and follow my faith.

I am not saying they are all perfect Muslims, but they do show their culture and religion a lot more respect than most of the christian or catholic women living in the uk.

Now don't get me wrong, I do maintain a when in Rome type of attitude, but I dont see people putting themselves out there to support their own faith.

I would like to see a bit more evidence that we as a society can be culturally strong, if we do not show or support our own faith, how can we damn another??
Old 17 October 2010, 12:13 AM
  #74  
ScooByer Trade
Scooby Regular
 
ScooByer Trade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A load of b****ks is what i think.
Old 17 October 2010, 12:17 AM
  #75  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
Interesting. What does it say about enlightenment when 14 year old girls walk down the road in mini skirts and see through tops then? I find that just as odd as I do the Burkha, but if that's what they (and their parents) want to do that's their choice. It's fundamentally different to what I think is right but I don't believe they are posturing at me saying they are superior because they can expose more flesh
Many would consider this vulgar and inappropriate, some would attribute this to teenage expression, no right thinking person would offer it up as a serious expression of meaningful ideology.
Old 17 October 2010, 12:28 AM
  #76  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hysteria1983
I know that embracing religion in a society these days isn't common, but at least the women who wear this garment are not scared to say I am faithfull and follow my faith.

I am not saying they are all perfect Muslims, but they do show their culture and religion a lot more respect than most of the christian or catholic women living in the uk.

Now don't get me wrong, I do maintain a when in Rome type of attitude, but I dont see people putting themselves out there to support their own faith.

I would like to see a bit more evidence that we as a society can be culturally strong, if we do not show or support our own faith, how can we damn another??
I hear what you say and I think you need to look at the difference between Islam and Islamism. One is a faith, the other is an ideology. Many commentators (from both Islam and The West) suggest that one can't claim to be a true Muslim without perpetuating Islamism. Wearing a burkha perpetuates Islamism.

I agree that we need to re-assert our identity but would suggest that this would be securalism. Islamism is in opposition to secularism.
Old 17 October 2010, 12:33 AM
  #77  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree that we need to re-assert our identity but would suggest that this would be securalism. Islamism is in opposition to secularism.
[/QUOTE]

So is Catholicism, Judaism and Buddhism, or any other mainstream religion for that matter

Last edited by Martin2005; 17 October 2010 at 12:36 AM.
Old 17 October 2010, 12:37 AM
  #78  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Would you mind explaining (please I keep on asking but to no effect) what you mean by 'Enlightenment', especially as you continually capitalise the E?
Where reason is advocated as the primary source for legitimacy and authority. Enlightement is captilised in the same way as Dark Ages is. It's pretty standard form.

I put up a link in the other thread and assumed that your reading of it would satisfactorily answer your question. The Enlightenment is the keystone of Western thought.
Old 17 October 2010, 12:43 AM
  #79  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
But surely banning an item of clothing is some way down the list of things that should be banned? How about...

Guns
Knives
Dangerous Dogs
Writing the word 'England' on an England flag
If you view the burkha 'as simply an item of clothing' then you disqualify yourself from the debate on the charge of ignorance. I'll assume the second part of your post was playful churlishness.
Old 17 October 2010, 12:44 AM
  #80  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Where reason is advocated as the primary source for legitimacy and authority. Enlightement is captilised in the same way as Dark Ages is. It's pretty standard form.

I put up a link in the other thread and assumed that your reading of it would satisfactorily answer your question. The Enlightenment is the keystone of Western thought.
Thats an incredibly arrogant view. Since when did the West have a manopoly on 'enlightenment'?
Old 17 October 2010, 12:54 AM
  #81  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So is Catholicism, Judaism and Buddhism, or any other mainstream religion for that matter[/QUOTE]

This is incorrect. You seem incapable of understanding the difference between the seperation of church and state (a pivotal idea within the Enlightenment) and Theocracy. Islamism proposes theocracy, the same cannot be said, with any credibility or meaning of the religions you mention above.
Old 17 October 2010, 01:02 AM
  #82  
Glowplug
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Glowplug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On The Road!
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, they are all good people, just showing their commitment to their faith, religion and ideology. They mean no harm, let them intergate into our Christian communities, what harm can it do. We should all live together in peace and harmony. In fact we should look forward to the day, that day when we bring in a islamic/muslim prime minister and embrace the restructuring that they will bring. Just look at the love and peace that they have created for them selves in their own country. Now due to that success and the overwhelming influx of people into their homeland, they now feel that the UK and any other bend-over-and-take-it-up-the-*** western countries would also benifit from their beliefes and practices. Can you imagine the awful mess the western world would be in if it wasn't for their intervention.

All the lilly livered, liberal, multi-national fan boys and girls will have only them selves to blame.
Old 17 October 2010, 01:05 AM
  #83  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Thats an incredibly arrogant view. Since when did the West have a manopoly on 'enlightenment'?
The Enlightenment

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_o...edirected=true

enlightenment

http://www.answers.com/topic/enlightenment



http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capit...edirected=true
Old 17 October 2010, 01:09 AM
  #84  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Please please please do not quote friggin Wikipedia at me, that means absolutely nothing in this discussion
Old 17 October 2010, 01:29 AM
  #85  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What source do you propose I use to differentiate between enlightenment and The Enlightenment and to explain to you how capitilisation works? I'm completely flexible.

I trust you're not trying to derail this debate with juvenille tactics, Martin. It is either that or you are lacking a broad understanding of the subject. As they say, a little knowledge can be dangerous.
Old 17 October 2010, 02:16 AM
  #86  
Dedrater
Scooby Regular
 
Dedrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Please please please do not quote friggin Wikipedia at me, that means absolutely nothing in this discussion
Old 17 October 2010, 08:32 AM
  #87  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
What source do you propose I use to differentiate between enlightenment and The Enlightenment and to explain to you how capitilisation works? I'm completely flexible.

I trust you're not trying to derail this debate with juvenille tactics, Martin. It is either that or you are lacking a broad understanding of the subject. As they say, a little knowledge can be dangerous.
Touché!
Old 17 October 2010, 08:48 AM
  #88  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
Do you believe all these people are making a statement to you and the 'mainstream' (of which you must be a part) that they are better than you?
In a sense yes if you rationalise it, but that is NOT an emotion on my part.
Old 17 October 2010, 08:55 AM
  #89  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
I'm not answering on TDW's behalf but would like to offer my own rationalisation which is this: the wearing of a burkha is a symbolic opposition to the Enlightenment derived, liberal principles upon which my country (and that of our cousins in Europe and America) are based. My view is that burkha wearing screams 'I'm fundamentally different to you'. One can only assume that those that engage in this kind of posturing do so in the belief that their position is superior.
Well it's historically a means for the (Islamic) patriarchy to oppress women, control them etc, but it's been transformed into a symbol of Islamist refusal/defiance against secularism/liberalism in recent years. It's western muslim women choosing to wear it you see?
Old 17 October 2010, 09:29 AM
  #90  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
In a sense yes if you rationalise it, but that is NOT an emotion on my part.

What you say makes no sense. I don't think you actually understand the words you use.


Quick Reply: Islamic face-veil part of 'British way of life'



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 PM.