Nissan GTR- test drive
#31
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
I had a guy in work today who's got a GTR
Slightly off topic perhaps, but he's had a very bad run of luck with his
Exploding bonnet
Brake disc failure of some type
Broken gearbox
He's currently trying to sell it - as he says the running costs are very high.
His insurance has doubled in the last two years.
Slightly off topic perhaps, but he's had a very bad run of luck with his
Exploding bonnet
Brake disc failure of some type
Broken gearbox
He's currently trying to sell it - as he says the running costs are very high.
His insurance has doubled in the last two years.
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
It appears to pay off when you consider how well something so heavy can change direction/handle and the grip is incredible.
#33
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That may be all true and yet it results in a car that is very large and very heavy. Give a tight and twisty circuit and the GT3 RS is the quicker car (evo results on West Circuit which is not actually that tight).
So it is a very fast car with monumental grip but does it really handle?
Lighter cars have many virtues and what they may lose (in a very small way) in grip and I sure they could make up in handling - e.g. Caterham, Lotus 2-11, Exige, GT3 RS.
So it is a very fast car with monumental grip but does it really handle?
Lighter cars have many virtues and what they may lose (in a very small way) in grip and I sure they could make up in handling - e.g. Caterham, Lotus 2-11, Exige, GT3 RS.
#34
Would love a go in one of these, anything that people remark on the performance in such high regard is always a draw, however they weigh 1700 odd kilos and have 470 bhp which in these strange times seems quite heavy compared to the BHP, a lot of Mercs have that but they dont get the same reverence with the performance so how did Nissan do it as on paper it should be fast but not that fast, is it like in the past where they quote one figure but its actually more ?
And how fast must that Noble M600 be to make one look comparatively slow !
And how fast must that Noble M600 be to make one look comparatively slow !
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have often wondered the same think J4CKO. I have seen a few vids of stock GTRs thumping M5s from a roll which should be near impossible with only fractionally less weight, 37bhp less and 4wd losses - we arent talking about just beating them either, it is a decent victory.
I conclude that a) the lightening quick gearbox helps a lot and b) they have more than quoted power - probably nearer 500bhp.
I conclude that a) the lightening quick gearbox helps a lot and b) they have more than quoted power - probably nearer 500bhp.
#38
#39
I didn't realise the turbo was that much faster, looks like the GT3 even jumped the start.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=hPBeM3UhKyo
Zip
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=hPBeM3UhKyo
Zip
Last edited by MMT WRX; 27 August 2010 at 01:52 PM.
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#41
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Btw did they say whether the 997tts was manual or PDK?
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
You selectively chose a result that favours one car. Light cars are not fun to crash in, not sensible for daily use in all weathers and for carrying stuff. This is a road car for me, not a track car, but generally the track results blow anything remotely similar on price or power:weight out the water. Any RWD Porsche would never be a consideration for me for a year round car to use in Scotland.
It depends what you mean by handling, it can include steering response, weighting of controls, oversteer/understeer balance, throttle adjustability etc. I prefer longitudinal or lateral g over handling though. I'd much rather be able to pull 1+g in any direction without needing much driver skill than pull 0.9g and have a lot of driver input. Just me perhaps.
The only Porsche that directly competes is the 997.2 PDK Turbo and that accelerates faster in a straight line (fixed with a remap using the product I help to develop ) but is slower around all the track results I've seen that compare. It is about double the price with sensible options, but it does have a stronger gearbox and better cooling.
It depends what you mean by handling, it can include steering response, weighting of controls, oversteer/understeer balance, throttle adjustability etc. I prefer longitudinal or lateral g over handling though. I'd much rather be able to pull 1+g in any direction without needing much driver skill than pull 0.9g and have a lot of driver input. Just me perhaps.
The only Porsche that directly competes is the 997.2 PDK Turbo and that accelerates faster in a straight line (fixed with a remap using the product I help to develop ) but is slower around all the track results I've seen that compare. It is about double the price with sensible options, but it does have a stronger gearbox and better cooling.
That may be all true and yet it results in a car that is very large and very heavy. Give a tight and twisty circuit and the GT3 RS is the quicker car (evo results on West Circuit which is not actually that tight).
So it is a very fast car with monumental grip but does it really handle?
Lighter cars have many virtues and what they may lose (in a very small way) in grip and I sure they could make up in handling - e.g. Caterham, Lotus 2-11, Exige, GT3 RS.
So it is a very fast car with monumental grip but does it really handle?
Lighter cars have many virtues and what they may lose (in a very small way) in grip and I sure they could make up in handling - e.g. Caterham, Lotus 2-11, Exige, GT3 RS.
Last edited by john banks; 27 August 2010 at 02:26 PM.
#43
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Agreed. You can't compare a GTR to a Porsche GT3 RS even. The GTR is an everyday car that you can go shopping in come snow, rain etc. I wouldn't classify the GT3 RS as that
#44
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't realise the turbo was that much faster, looks like the GT3 even jumped the start.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=hPBeM3UhKyo
Zip
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=hPBeM3UhKyo
Zip
#45
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You selectively chose a result that favours one car. Light cars are not fun to crash in, not sensible for daily use in all weathers and for carrying stuff. This is a road car for me, not a track car, but generally the track results blow anything remotely similar on price or power:weight out the water. Any RWD Porsche would never be a consideration for me for a year round car to use in Scotland.
It depends what you mean by handling, it can include steering response, weighting of controls, oversteer/understeer balance, throttle adjustability etc. I prefer longitudinal or lateral g over handling though. I'd much rather be able to pull 1+g in any direction without needing much driver skill than pull 0.9g and have a lot of driver input. Just me perhaps.
The only Porsche that directly competes is the 997.2 PDK Turbo and that accelerates faster in a straight line (fixed with a remap using the product I help to develop ) but is slower around all the track results I've seen that compare. It is about double the price with sensible options, but it does have a stronger gearbox and better cooling.
It depends what you mean by handling, it can include steering response, weighting of controls, oversteer/understeer balance, throttle adjustability etc. I prefer longitudinal or lateral g over handling though. I'd much rather be able to pull 1+g in any direction without needing much driver skill than pull 0.9g and have a lot of driver input. Just me perhaps.
The only Porsche that directly competes is the 997.2 PDK Turbo and that accelerates faster in a straight line (fixed with a remap using the product I help to develop ) but is slower around all the track results I've seen that compare. It is about double the price with sensible options, but it does have a stronger gearbox and better cooling.
As for lateral G - even a 996 GT3 will pull over 1.0g without superhuman effort, but it is also very adjustable and has fabulous handling. I do think that with cars like the Subaru, Evo and Skyline/GTR superlative grip and acceleration is confused for handling.
As for living with a car day to day - my GT3 is my day car. And it has as many usable seats as a GTR
#46
Links to M5board (its working for me )
997 GT3 RS V 997 Turbo both manuals.
I think its from 50 - 180 km/h.
GT3 appears to jump the start a bit, but the turbo nails it and leaves the GT3 for dead. I'm surprised at just how much ground the Turbo put between them.
997 GT3 RS V 997 Turbo both manuals.
I think its from 50 - 180 km/h.
GT3 appears to jump the start a bit, but the turbo nails it and leaves the GT3 for dead. I'm surprised at just how much ground the Turbo put between them.
#47
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It must be picking up something in your cache as it links to a duff You Tube page for me!
The new Turbos are very quick in a straight line. The S does 0-100 in 6.8secs where the GT3 will take nearly 9s (yep it's really slow! )
I know which one I would prefer though...
...the GT2 RS
The new Turbos are very quick in a straight line. The S does 0-100 in 6.8secs where the GT3 will take nearly 9s (yep it's really slow! )
I know which one I would prefer though...
...the GT2 RS
#49
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
My comment was not about the car overall it was about what constitutes a good handling car. Personally I do not think the 911 Turbo is a comparison. In a straight line the 911 Turbo would accelerate faster - but around a circuit a GT3 would be quicker. The Turbo is a hugely accelerative car with amazing grip. Which goes to my point.
As for lateral G - even a 996 GT3 will pull over 1.0g without superhuman effort, but it is also very adjustable and has fabulous handling. I do think that with cars like the Subaru, Evo and Skyline/GTR superlative grip and acceleration is confused for handling.
As for living with a car day to day - my GT3 is my day car. And it has as many usable seats as a GTR
As for lateral G - even a 996 GT3 will pull over 1.0g without superhuman effort, but it is also very adjustable and has fabulous handling. I do think that with cars like the Subaru, Evo and Skyline/GTR superlative grip and acceleration is confused for handling.
As for living with a car day to day - my GT3 is my day car. And it has as many usable seats as a GTR
Do you find the GTR handling lacking?
Personally I like the GTR as it can mix it with track cars and GT3s, although it would need to cool down more often, but then can be used
The GTR does this and goes around a circuit faster than the Turbo, sometimes faster, sometimes slower than a GT3 RS. Have you driven one and found it lacking in the handling department, or is it a preconception?
#51
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Did you use the GT3 in the snow/ice in January? The GTR got out of our farm and into many others where our Golf was stuck. It collected our Xmas turkey in the ice where only 4wd vehicles were going. All on summer tyres.
Do you find the GTR handling lacking?
Personally I like the GTR as it can mix it with track cars and GT3s, although it would need to cool down more often, but then can be used
The GTR does this and goes around a circuit faster than the Turbo, sometimes faster, sometimes slower than a GT3 RS. Have you driven one and found it lacking in the handling department, or is it a preconception?
Do you find the GTR handling lacking?
Personally I like the GTR as it can mix it with track cars and GT3s, although it would need to cool down more often, but then can be used
The GTR does this and goes around a circuit faster than the Turbo, sometimes faster, sometimes slower than a GT3 RS. Have you driven one and found it lacking in the handling department, or is it a preconception?
I'm sure the GT3 is a fantastic car especially on track, but to me it is not an everyday car, especially in clubsport guise (and anybody who buys the 'comfort' version is a pillow biter anyway)
Btw has anybody here driven a PDK car? I'd be interested to hear feedback.
Looking at some vids on the 997.2 turboS its good to see that the extra £60k price of the 997 over the GTR does buy you better engineering that the makers have faith in.
Launch control in the GTR will invalidate your warranty, and this was spelt out to me by the Nissan salesman. In the Porsche, no problem, use it as many times as you want
#52
Here you go (the other link is for your mobile)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPBeM3UhKyo
Something must have gone wrong with the GT3 or he chucked his toys out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPBeM3UhKyo
Something must have gone wrong with the GT3 or he chucked his toys out
#53
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Here you go (the other link is for your mobile)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPBeM3UhKyo
Something must have gone wrong with the GT3 or he chucked his toys out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPBeM3UhKyo
Something must have gone wrong with the GT3 or he chucked his toys out
To coin a scoobynet fave expression, the GT3 RS was RAPED!!!
#55
Im looking at Golf's with a 1.8T conversion that are about that bhp/tonne, i.e. a 1.8T TT engine in a tonnes worth of Golf tuned to getting on for 300 bhp without much effort, so 276 bhp/tonne doesnt explain the epic performance reviews they get, not doubting it, just celebrating it and wondering how what seems a "workmanlike" power to weight is so mind bending even to hardened tuned Scoob and other performance car owners, I can only assume they make more power than advertised, even Matteeboy defers to a GTR ! and that is the main factor for me
#56
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: wirral,merseyside
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looked like he got a dog **** start in the GTR but he also had a bad start in the lexus so some of it is down to the fella not being capable of launching them hard of the line.
He wouldn't have beat the porker anyway as it was awesome off the line and continued to pull harder than the GTR but it wouldn't have looked as poor if the GTR had actually got off the line quicker than a Rover 200 lol
He wouldn't have beat the porker anyway as it was awesome off the line and continued to pull harder than the GTR but it wouldn't have looked as poor if the GTR had actually got off the line quicker than a Rover 200 lol
#57
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In no particular order
Yes I used my GT3 in the snow and ice in January - it is my only car - never got stuck, never spun off.
Of course I do love my car but there are plenty of other cars out there (including some I have listed) that will run rings around the GT3 in many departments. There are many faster cars as well, in a straight line, such as 911 Turbos.
I have not driven the GTR but if you note my posts I have asked a question not made an assertion. I asked that like Scoobs, do GTRs rely on monumental grip and acceleration rather than handling. I merely use the GT3 as an example of a relatively low powered supercar that benefits from decent handling. Although it does have monumental grip as well - perhaps even more than a GTR as it turns out. There are others that also make this challenge that are perhaps less practical such as a Caterham R400 or R500 or Lotus Exige.
For a while I really, really wanted to get a GTR. It was the centre piece of my vision board from the very first photo being put out there. What put me off? Size, weight, weak gearbox rumours, servicing costs, potentially horrendous track day costs due to all of the above. I now add the need to cool it off
Back to my real question - does it really need to be so heavy? And does this weight damage it's potential as a handling car?
Yes I used my GT3 in the snow and ice in January - it is my only car - never got stuck, never spun off.
Of course I do love my car but there are plenty of other cars out there (including some I have listed) that will run rings around the GT3 in many departments. There are many faster cars as well, in a straight line, such as 911 Turbos.
I have not driven the GTR but if you note my posts I have asked a question not made an assertion. I asked that like Scoobs, do GTRs rely on monumental grip and acceleration rather than handling. I merely use the GT3 as an example of a relatively low powered supercar that benefits from decent handling. Although it does have monumental grip as well - perhaps even more than a GTR as it turns out. There are others that also make this challenge that are perhaps less practical such as a Caterham R400 or R500 or Lotus Exige.
For a while I really, really wanted to get a GTR. It was the centre piece of my vision board from the very first photo being put out there. What put me off? Size, weight, weak gearbox rumours, servicing costs, potentially horrendous track day costs due to all of the above. I now add the need to cool it off
Back to my real question - does it really need to be so heavy? And does this weight damage it's potential as a handling car?
#60
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Anyway, I do understand your question. I think you may just be using slightly ambiguous terminology. What I think you are asking (and I wondered this myself) is does the GTR put in impressive track times by way of its sheer 4wd grip or does one actually enjoy some driver input and adjustability along the way?
I can't answer that as it was raining hard when I test drove.