Notices

400+ BHP QUESTION... ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 June 2009, 12:32 AM
  #31  
radboy69
Scooby Regular
 
radboy69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: howden, selby
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you still selling that dave???

if so how much m8
Old 15 June 2009, 12:40 AM
  #32  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
Lag is a term used far too loosely IMHO.

It's the response between gearshifts which can make a difference.
Agree. Lag is not the same as later spool.

As you say, lag/lack of drivability, is when you fall into that torque-less 'hole' when the turbo's spool point is mismatched to the gear ratios, for example....

I'm all for a bit of later spool trade-off if it means the gain is horizon-chasing thrust...
Old 15 June 2009, 04:28 PM
  #33  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Best to have a chat with Paul @ Zen Performance.

He built the engine and will be able to advise on the different options for your motor.
Old 15 June 2009, 05:08 PM
  #34  
WRX_Rich
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
WRX_Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Worcester
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

make sure you compare like for like when your looking at your options

IE don't compare a newage sti running a 321T to your wrx as you will get later spool

If I was you i would go with the smaller turbo but try running a fuel combination that gives you more top end

I ran a turbo that gave 1 bar at around 3.8k revs and I wouldn't want power any later than that on a road car

best bet for you is talk to zen as he will know what is best for you
Old 15 June 2009, 07:07 PM
  #35  
lunar tick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
lunar tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dave_garrett
MD321t is the way forward I'm runing a 321t on standard internals (sti 8) at 410 bhp 340ft lbs (1.5 bar which most people would agree is very safe) and chrisdicko is running his 321t at 340bhp 370ft lbs (standard internals sti8).
What's the point of running a 450bhp turbo at such modest power levels? I'm running a 321H on standard internals on an STI8 2L. It makes 415bhp, 379lb/ft and of course is significantly quicker spooling than the T, so quicker on the road in all respects.

I've done over 30,000 miles at this state of tune and the car still runs as sweet as a nut (Zen mapped). Moreover, a number of people such as JD and others who do run bigger turbos are making 450bhp quite comfortably and relieably too
Old 15 June 2009, 08:45 PM
  #36  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Here is the thread with the md321t. I used the page where terry explains what the turbo is like

https://www.scoobynet.com/projects-4...-target-5.html
Old 16 June 2009, 02:18 AM
  #37  
chrisdicko
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
chrisdicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dave_garrett
MD321t is the way forward (biased of cause as I'm selling one ). The 321H is a 400bhp turbo. The 321t is a 450bhp turbo. I'm runing a 321t on standard internals (sti 8) at 410 bhp 340ft lbs (1.5 bar which most people would agree is very safe) and chrisdicko is running his 321t at 340bhp 370ft lbs (standard internals sti8). 400bhp was last year on standard internals, lol .

Yes the 321t does spool up slightly later, but when you change gear at 6500rpm does your engine drop below 4000rpm? From first hand experience I can confirm there is no lag on my 321t when I'm going through the gears (don't confuse later spooling with lag). All my opinion of cause. As Steve said your future proofing as well.
435bhp Dave

Other than that, he speaks the truth

Last edited by chrisdicko; 16 June 2009 at 02:20 AM.
Old 16 June 2009, 07:00 AM
  #38  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

May be worth having a chat with me regarding the S206 from Turbo Technics, it will breeze past 400hp on 97 ron fuel. On my 2.1 stroker during development it made 450+ @ 1.6 bar on Sainsburys 97 ron fuel with 420lbft to boot.



Running at this level it ran an 11.1 second 1/4 mile at Shakespeare at the weekend.
Old 16 June 2009, 09:40 AM
  #39  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

- Thanks Martyn.

Is it available through Enginetuner, or direct from TT. I take it it's a stock position turbo? Price?

Many other Imprezas running it?


- Steve

Thanks for digging it out - will read it through when have time...

Last edited by joz8968; 16 June 2009 at 09:42 AM.
Old 16 June 2009, 12:50 PM
  #40  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Available soley through Enginetuner, and yes we are running 3 so far and another being fitted to a built 2 litre soon.
Old 16 June 2009, 02:03 PM
  #41  
Shmerman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Shmerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like the look of the S206
Old 16 June 2009, 02:20 PM
  #42  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shmerman
I like the look of the S206
I like the way it makes nearly-peak torque of c.420lb ft odd at c.4,300rpm

Last edited by joz8968; 16 June 2009 at 02:22 PM.
Old 16 June 2009, 02:34 PM
  #43  
scoobyDAZZA
Scooby Regular
 
scoobyDAZZA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: devon
Posts: 2,944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dave_garrett
MD321t is the way forward (biased of cause as I'm selling one ). The 321H is a 400bhp turbo. The 321t is a 450bhp turbo. I'm runing a 321t on standard internals (sti 8) at 410 bhp 340ft lbs (1.5 bar which most people would agree is very safe) and chrisdicko is running his 321t at 340bhp 370ft lbs (standard internals sti8). 400bhp was last year on standard internals, lol .

Yes the 321t does spool up slightly later, but when you change gear at 6500rpm does your engine drop below 4000rpm? From first hand experience I can confirm there is no lag on my 321t when I'm going through the gears (don't confuse later spooling with lag). All my opinion of cause. As Steve said your future proofing as well.


agree with that











i'm selling 1 as well
Old 16 June 2009, 07:58 PM
  #44  
The Seer
Scooby Regular
 
The Seer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Come on now John!!!

98 V-Power NO less!!!

Tesco fuel, tut tut!
Old 16 June 2009, 08:12 PM
  #45  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

lol at Mark.

Yep, I'll have to stop being lazy and be 'forced' into being a V-Power junkie...
Old 16 June 2009, 08:23 PM
  #46  
The Seer
Scooby Regular
 
The Seer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joz8968
lol at Mark.

Yep, I'll have to stop being lazy and be 'forced' into being a V-Power junkie...
That octane rating will give a slightly better overall performance. Then again you could use B.P.'s super fuel,quite cheap at a few quid per litre.
Old 16 June 2009, 09:53 PM
  #47  
p1doc
Scooby Regular
 
p1doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
May be worth having a chat with me regarding the S206 from Turbo Technics, it will breeze past 400hp on 97 ron fuel. On my 2.1 stroker during development it made 450+ @ 1.6 bar on Sainsburys 97 ron fuel with 420lbft to boot.



Running at this level it ran an 11.1 second 1/4 mile at Shakespeare at the weekend.
you mentioned this to me during engine build-would it destroy a type r gearbox??
martin
Old 24 June 2009, 10:26 AM
  #48  
Biggs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Biggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East Barnet/southgate on the borders of North London and Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jd5217
but what fuel?


V-power/optimax
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
09 March 2019 07:35 PM
Abx
Subaru
22
09 January 2016 05:42 PM
InTurbo
Other Marques
20
08 October 2015 08:59 PM
the shreksta
General Technical
27
02 October 2015 03:20 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM



Quick Reply: 400+ BHP QUESTION... ???



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 PM.