Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Focus RS - 25K??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 December 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #31  
theboy's Avatar
theboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
From: Rugby League the greatest game in the world
Default

Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
If you have no driving skill or control of your right foot then go for the ugly Subaru or Mitsi, if you can drive then go for the RS.

I like the look of the RS, but not sure if it's worth £27k for the acceptable spec version. My ST is just as quick as the RS will be for a fraction of the cost, plus mine looks better without the stick on bits.

Having said that, I may get an RS when they are 6-12 months old and have dropped a bit.
I was thinking of getting a ST, is the RS going to be a lot faster?
Old 17 December 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #32  
Janspeed's Avatar
Janspeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,968
Likes: 0
From: .........
Default

Ok girls, calm down!

There might NOT be a Ford to produce the RS quite soon!
Old 18 December 2008 | 02:24 PM
  #33  
Dream Weaver's Avatar
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 9,845
Likes: 2
From: Lancashire
Default

I really can't emphasise enough how much grip the ST has for a FWD car.

It's a different driving experience to any other FWD car I've had, which account for about 90% of my driving history.

I agree that ultimately, AWD is king in very slippy conditions but in real world driving there is just such a little difference between FWD and AWD that you would have to be hammering it to make AWD the clear winner and I'm too old for outright on the limit driving, even on a track. :blush:

For all those commenting on high power, FWD and ST's or RS you really need to own and drive one for a while to have a proper viewpoint, and I'm not talking weekend test drives or anything else silly like that.

My previous 205 was difficult in the wet - get the wheels spinning and it would go nowhere until you lifted, so when it was wet or slippy I would end up not bothering giving it any beans for fear of torque steering off.

But the ST is so different - I was out this morning in the wet/grease and on one particular right pedal moment it lost grip slightly at 1.2 bar of uphill boost, but instead of spinning and going nowhere, the ESP just kicked in a bit and allowed me to keep on going - it just doesn't have the "smoking tyre" wheelspin of other FWD cars I have owned and is almost like a very light ABS type feeling but moving forward.

As for point & squirt, that is exactly how I would describe my ST and it is pretty much the best car I have owned/driven to date.

For my driving style, the only advantage of AWD would be hooning away from a standing start (and looking like a ****), or absolutely flinging the car around tight hairpins (and looking like a ****), and I imagine it's the same for 99% of people on here. I just can't think of a situation I would be in where AWD would be a must, I'm not a racing driver.
Old 18 December 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #34  
Dream Weaver's Avatar
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 9,845
Likes: 2
From: Lancashire
Default

Originally Posted by theboy
I was thinking of getting a ST, is the RS going to be a lot faster?
My ST has remap, suspension, induction and exhaust and is around 285bhp so not much less than the RS, and in the real world it would be just as quick as the RS.

If they closed the roads, and I had to drive from here to the Lakes as quickly as possible against an STi and an RS I wouldn't be worried, let's just say that.
Old 18 December 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #35  
Mobbster's Avatar
Mobbster
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Hi
Dream weaver
The ST is a V-good car but after owning 3 of them all tuned to 260/280 bhp and the last one with the wolf package it will not be as good as an RS.
Ford are not going to build the RS only to have a tuned ST by say "mountune" out doing them.
They have put a lot of time in to the RS so im sure it will be quite a bit better than the ST in all areas.
Also the traction is good on the ST because you cannot achieve full boost in the first two gears and it also measures the cars steering angle and will also cut boost if to much lock is applied in the first two gears.
The RS will weigh more than the ST by around 70kgs though .
All the BEST
Cheers
Old 18 December 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #36  
Janspeed's Avatar
Janspeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,968
Likes: 0
From: .........
Default

Another pipedream, I tell ya............................................:rol leyes:
Old 18 December 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #37  
Dream Weaver's Avatar
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 9,845
Likes: 2
From: Lancashire
Default

Originally Posted by Mobbster
Ford are not going to build the RS only to have a tuned ST by say "mountune" out doing them.
Strange then that Ford quote the same 0-60 time of 5.9 secs for both the Mountune kit and the new RS, surely they would never do such a silly thing

I know 0-60 means nothing in the real world, but it does help to sell cars.
Old 18 December 2008 | 11:55 PM
  #38  
Mobbster's Avatar
Mobbster
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Hi Dream Weaver
Do your home work a little more one is 0-62 the other 0-60.
As i said before i have had the ST's and they are a V-good cars.
But ford wont shoot themselves in the foot and let a ford approved product "mountune" ford focus ST beat the RS performance wise period that would be plain silly
Cheers
Old 19 December 2008 | 12:01 AM
  #39  
Dream Weaver's Avatar
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 9,845
Likes: 2
From: Lancashire
Default

Originally Posted by Mobbster
Hi Dream Weaver
Do your home work a little more one is 0-62 the other 0-60.
As i said before i have had the ST's and they are a V-good cars.
But ford wont shoot themselves in the foot and let a ford approved product "mountune" ford focus ST beat the RS performance wise period that would be plain silly
Cheers
This is Ford we are talking about!!

The same folk that put the ST iPod socket in the glovebox so it can't be reached.

I'd be amazed if you can tell a performance difference from 60-62mph

RS may be marginally quicker when released, but as I said I wouldn't worry about one if it arrived in my mirrors, on private land of course.
Old 19 December 2008 | 12:10 AM
  #40  
Mobbster's Avatar
Mobbster
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Dream Weaver
The RS wont scare me even the Mrs car will see one of them off
But if that dont work im off to the garage to get the Evo
Cheers
Old 19 December 2008 | 01:01 AM
  #41  
G-string's Avatar
G-string
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
From: South Wales
Smile

As someone who comes from a xr/ rs background, and then had 5 scoobies, in between various other performance front wheel drive cars, Focus RS awesome car, should be, but as it aint a Cosworth or 4WD. Its not going to hold its value like you think. Alright it might be better than a Subaru residual wise but if you think its going to hold its value better than old focus RS your not going to be happy. Better car to drive everyday imho over the sti or evo, because everyday you dont drive on a race track and you dont have perfect weather (without rain snow, ice etc,). Sorry to blow your st/rs bubble but hey thats how it is, oh and if you can get get an evo or s3 for 25k I will have 2 of each

Last edited by G-string; 22 December 2008 at 12:52 AM.
Old 19 December 2008 | 07:15 AM
  #42  
drb5's Avatar
drb5
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,200
Likes: 0
From: Scotchland
Default

I've already said, i just ment get a DISCOUNT off list list and therefore CLOSE to 25k.

As soon as you add metallic paint onto the RS, it's close to 25.5k. Evo is 26.9k and S3 similar....not far off the price tag even at that!


Think the old boy is going to pull out. Together with it looking more and more ugly(our opinion) and our dealer not dealing with us sensibly and price being set too close to cars we'd possibly rather be in, it doesn't cut it for us.

Maybe at this time next year, we'll consider secondhand.
Old 19 December 2008 | 08:48 AM
  #43  
Spudgun GTR's Avatar
Spudgun GTR
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Thumbs down

if the new sti had a ford and cosworth badge on it, people would be raving about it. i cant understand why people would want a fwd hothatch these days, no matter who makes it.

no matter how i look at it, i think its naff, and best left to chav boys doing laps of town centres on a saturday night. awd or rwd only for proper cars please.
Old 19 December 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #44  
Dream Weaver's Avatar
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 9,845
Likes: 2
From: Lancashire
Default

Only those that drive like a **** on public roads would ever see the advantage of AWD/RWD over FWD in real world driving on normal roads.

As for everyday car G String, are you telling me a 4WD Evo FQ320 thing or a bumpy STI would be easier for my Mrs to drive to work than a Focus ST?

My ST is nicer and much easier to drive than our family Civic 2.2.

Last edited by Dream Weaver; 19 December 2008 at 01:02 PM.
Old 21 December 2008 | 02:08 PM
  #45  
rabbos's Avatar
rabbos
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Default

Call me cynical if you like but the same team makes both the ST and the RS.

They take the focus and adorn it with whichever badge (and halfords accessories) the marketing lot tell them to.

You can feel an ST's weight through the corners and in braking. Adding another 100kg isn't going to help..oh wait more power and a revo -knuckle should bend the laws of physics
Old 21 December 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #46  
P1Fanatic's Avatar
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
From: Arborfield, Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
An STI looks value for money providing you want a very very ugly hatchback that looks like a Mazda 3, don't mind paying £450 a year tax and £800+ a year to service it!!
Each to their own. I think the current sti looks pretty sweet in white and the ins is only about £70 more per year for me than an ST.

As for the servicing how do you get to £800+ a year?

Simon
Old 21 December 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #47  
scoobyboy1's Avatar
scoobyboy1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,616
Likes: 0
From: Willenhall, West Midlands
Default

Is it me or does anyone else think that all new affordable cars(sub 30k) are to heavy and ugly now. Best thing about having a Evo or a Scooby 10 years ago was that they had 280+bhp and where light and you could show some of these executive super saloons up with big bhp but weighed twice as much as a classic, now the newer shape cars have a extra 20bhp and weigh more.
Same goes for the Focus RS, old shape was light and now the new shape has arrived with lots of extra weight which in my opinion spoils newer cars, shame really as Id rather have a car with a better power/weight!!!!
Old 01 January 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #48  
P1Fanatic's Avatar
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
From: Arborfield, Berkshire
Default

So how heavy is an ST?

Simon
Old 01 January 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #49  
Shins's Avatar
Shins
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Manc Land
Default

1392kg!

That makes the new FRS at least 150kgs heavier than the MK1 FRS (1278kg)!

Last edited by Shins; 01 January 2009 at 06:21 PM.
Old 01 January 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #50  
Maxxed_Ross's Avatar
Maxxed_Ross
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Falkirk - Livingston - North Sea!
Default

I had my name down for one of these new RS, but I sold my space on after deciding the Hawk-Eye was a far better (and cheaper) option

Nice as it is, at the end of the day it's still a ford, will still loose shed loads of value as soon as it turns a wheel and you will still be limited to what you can do by the FWD set up.

IMO £25k is far too much for what it is - I was expecting more around the £20k mark
Old 02 January 2009 | 09:55 AM
  #51  
P1Fanatic's Avatar
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
From: Arborfield, Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by Shins
1392kg!

That makes the new FRS at least 150kgs heavier than the MK1 FRS (1278kg)!
I couldnt find it on Ford.co.uk (really not a great site for navigating model tech specs). Eventually found it on Parkers

Simon
Old 05 January 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #52  
MattW's Avatar
MattW
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,021
Likes: 0
Default

So, anyone have one on order?
Old 05 January 2009 | 02:41 PM
  #53  
Maxxed_Ross's Avatar
Maxxed_Ross
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Falkirk - Livingston - North Sea!
Default

I did, but fell out with the salesman and cancelled it

Bye bye big fat comission cheque
Old 05 January 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #54  
drb5's Avatar
drb5
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,200
Likes: 0
From: Scotchland
Default

It isn't even just the initial price....it's the fact that not ONE other dealer in the UK(or most places in the world i reckon), is ever going to sell ANY car at list price in the current economic situation, least of all a tarted up Ford Focus.

Discount is a must right now for the customers imo.
Old 05 January 2009 | 11:17 PM
  #55  
Pete's Avatar
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 7
From: Shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by Maxxed_Ross

Nice as it is, at the end of the day it's still a ford, will still loose shed loads of value as soon as it turns a wheel


Yeah, cus Subarus DON,T.....
Old 06 January 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #56  
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,156
Likes: 14
From: To the valley men!
Default

A Ford dealer in Oxford offered a new RS to my mate for £23k NEW! Depreciation is already hitting the RS before it's release.
Old 06 January 2009 | 03:34 PM
  #57  
Matteeboy's Avatar
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Mars
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
Yeah, cus Subarus DON,T.....
No car is remotely safe from depreciation now be it a Fiat or a Porsche.
Anyone that thinks "X" brand is safer than any other one is a deluded t1t.
Old 06 January 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #58  
Pete's Avatar
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 7
From: Shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by Matteeboy
No car is remotely safe from depreciation now be it a Fiat or a Porsche.
Anyone that thinks "X" brand is safer than any other one is a deluded t1t.

Lol,

You,re not very bright are you??


If you read my post again i,m saying EXACTLY what you,ve said, i sadi YEAH CUS SUBARUS DON,T, with rolleyes meaning they do....
Old 06 January 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #59  
Matteeboy's Avatar
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Mars
Default

Pete - I misquoted and actually totally agreed with you. The previous quote was meant to come up too (to put it into context) but didn't.

Engineering degree and run a pretty successful company PLUS we won the pub quiz not long ago. I'm a godamned genius I'll have you know...

Now get off this:



and onto something a little more suitable:


Last edited by Matteeboy; 06 January 2009 at 04:19 PM.
Old 06 January 2009 | 04:45 PM
  #60  
Pete's Avatar
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,151
Likes: 7
From: Shropshire
Default



Just spat my tea out...


GREAT REPLY THAT....


Quick Reply: Focus RS - 25K??



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:57 PM.