Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Someone loves the Credit Crunch.................

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 12:42 AM
  #61  
Lisawrx's Avatar
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 1
From: Where I am
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
The sentiment is good but is this really what we have to do nowadays, find ways of convincing people they really want to work?
Go back 50 years and a job was valued because without one life was genuinely tough, maybe the difference between a warm house or a cold one, or a full stomach or an empty one.
With the state wet-nursing every misfit is the current attitude of many much of a surprise?
Kevin
Truthfully, only imo, there are so many issues that need addressing within society now, for one reason or another. That doesn't mean the easy fix, of throwing money at it, or for that matter ignoring entirely. There needs to come a point, problems are addressed from the root, not just sticking a plaster on. Things will never go back to how they were, and possibly never should, but I firmly believe someone needs to look at the issues we are faced with, and attempt to actually deal with them.

It doesn't help, across the board, many values appear to have gone out of the window. This is apparent in lower classes, as much as any others from what I see. Morals/respect and general decency are less and less apparent, for whatever reason, and this honestly seems to be not necessarily class dependent. Maybe we all need to take a look at ourselves, and how we behave, so much as judging others.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 01:05 AM
  #62  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

Bring back the poorhouses - the buggers wouldnt have the energy to breed so many wasters
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #64  
jods's Avatar
jods
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,645
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

My take on this.

Abolish Welfare.
Abolish NI.

Make income tax per annum (per person):
3% on earnings under £30K
4% on earnings up to £40K
5% on earnings up to £90K
8% on earnings up to £180K
12% on earnings up to £500K
20% on earnings up to £1000K
25% on earnings over £1000K

Now, here's the hook.

Anyone, in any band, attracting a tax take by Central Goverment can choose to make a donation to:

A. The Local Diocese / Council, (To care for those falling on hard times, etc) Every pound donated earns a Tax credit of 10% of the value donated.

B. Nationally, (To care for those falling on hard times, etc)
Every pound donated earns a Tax credit of 20% of the value donated.

C. Globally (To care for those falling on hard times etc)
Every pound donated earns a Tax credit of 30% of the value donated.

Any healthcare costs should be covered by insurance for those wishing / able to pay for it. Anyone unable to pay for healthcare should be able to make a representation to the Local / National / Global fund managers.

D.
Section 13
Chapter 06
Paragraph 66

"All drivers of Subaru Imprezas will be exempt from fuel tax and will be eligible for an annual [Nationally paid for] "Jolly" to the Nurburgring"


Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #65  
PeteBrant's Avatar
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,576
Likes: 0
From: Worthing..
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005

I think your various posts sum up the situation rather well, there are no easy answers here. NOBODY wants people abusing the system, but I'd rather let some get away with it than penalise honest many
Precisely.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 10:19 AM
  #66  
PeteBrant's Avatar
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,576
Likes: 0
From: Worthing..
Default

Originally Posted by jods
"All drivers of Subaru Imprezas will be exempt from fuel tax and will be eligible for an annual [Nationally paid for] "Jolly" to the Nurburgring"
Only annual?
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #67  
Scoob99's Avatar
Scoob99
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,655
Likes: 0
From: Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo 7 Speed DSG now bought and loving it!!!!!
Default

Words fail me!!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 11:36 AM
  #68  
OllyK's Avatar
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

Originally Posted by Blue Dragoon
No National Service please! A volunteer is better than ten pressed men.
In this day and age it's not about generating men fit for the front line, it's about instilling some discipline and self worth.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 11:55 AM
  #69  
OllyK's Avatar
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Just out of interest, like, how much do people think the state should contribute to a family of 10 children? If at all.

I mean, of course its morally reprehensible to expect the state to support you and your family, but, it is just as morally wrong to say "tough".

I dont see how you can't pay the money, as a state? I mean these are kids -what other option is there?
Pay for the first, if you can't get a job or keep you legs shut after that, tough.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #70  
Geezer's Avatar
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Cool

Originally Posted by c_maguire
The sentiment is good but is this really what we have to do nowadays, find ways of convincing people they really want to work?
Go back 50 years and a job was valued because without one life was genuinely tough, maybe the difference between a warm house or a cold one, or a full stomach or an empty one.
With the state wet-nursing every misfit is the current attitude of many much of a surprise?
Kevin
Maybe, but many years the situation was quite different than it is now. We had full (well, whatever measure they use to say "full") employment and we had a thriving manufacturing undustry and litte IT penetration. Unfortunately now, virtually all of our manufacturing industry has gone, and IT has allowed companies to employ much less people for far greater return. This and other factors mean there are less well paid jobs around for a greater population.

We have less police, more people and less jobs. Whatever your stance on benefits and how people out of work should be treated, the simple fact is that if these people have no money, and cannot get jobs, you cannot leave them to starve. Apart from being an amoral thing to do, the rise in crime would be incalcuable.

Cases like this do make make pleasant reading, but i would imagine it is the minority, not the majority that abuse the system. The papers wouldn't sell many copies if they were full of boring stories of people obeying the law, or being nice to each other!

As for Matin2005s argument about the electorate, I don't know why anyone is arguing against him? It's patently obvious that neither side has the core support to win an election, so the large floating vote (whatever it's social makeup) has effectively created this issue if you want to blame them for voting NL in. Any other view is illogical and baseless.

Geezer
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #71  
PeteBrant's Avatar
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,576
Likes: 0
From: Worthing..
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
Maybe, but many years the situation was quite different than it is now. We had full (well, whatever measure they use to say "full") employment and we had a thriving manufacturing undustry and litte IT penetration. Unfortunately now, virtually all of our manufacturing industry has gone, and IT has allowed companies to employ much less people for far greater return. This and other factors mean there are less well paid jobs around for a greater population.

We have less police, more people and less jobs. Whatever your stance on benefits and how people out of work should be treated, the simple fact is that if these people have no money, and cannot get jobs, you cannot leave them to starve. Apart from being an amoral thing to do, the rise in crime would be incalcuable.

Cases like this do make make pleasant reading, but i would imagine it is the minority, not the majority that abuse the system. The papers wouldn't sell many copies if they were full of boring stories of people obeying the law, or being nice to each other!

As for Matin2005s argument about the electorate, I don't know why anyone is arguing against him? It's patently obvious that neither side has the core support to win an election, so the large floating vote (whatever it's social makeup) has effectively created this issue if you want to blame them for voting NL in. Any other view is illogical and baseless.

Geezer
Superb stuff.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #72  
pwhittle's Avatar
pwhittle
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Just out of interest, like, how much do people think the state should contribute to a family of 10 children? If at all.

I mean, of course its morally reprehensible to expect the state to support you and your family, but, it is just as morally wrong to say "tough".

I dont see how you can't pay the money, as a state? I mean these are kids -what other option is there?
I have issues with the tem 'povity' used in this country, and often referred to by campaign groups to counter calls for crack-downs on benefits and benefit fraud. Povity seem to having a roof over your head, 'essentials' like TV, sat etc, but only being able to shop at Asda.

Walking miles a day for water - that's povity. Sleeping at the side of the road living of scaps - that's povity. Sleeping in sewers becuase the streets aro too cold - that's povity.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #73  
PeteBrant's Avatar
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,576
Likes: 0
From: Worthing..
Default

Poverty is relative to your reality.

Sitting in a house with no heating because you cannot afford to pay the bills the middle of winter is "poverty" in this country.

Not having the money to be able to buy your kids fresh food is "poverty" in this country

Dying from starvation because you cant afford to eat is "poverty" in another.

In other words, someone very poor in this country, may appear as wealthy as a king in another.

Of course, the UK is the fifth richest nation on the planet, there really is no excuse at all to have people in any sort of poverty at all.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
serpico
ScoobyNet General
20
Apr 1, 2019 07:47 AM
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
Oct 20, 2015 04:32 PM
blackieblob
ScoobyNet General
2
Oct 2, 2015 05:34 PM
Littleted
Non Scooby Related
6
Oct 2, 2015 11:31 AM
Benrowe727
ScoobyNet General
7
Sep 28, 2015 07:05 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 PM.