Japan F1 GP
#181
Scooby Regular
Yes thats true initially, but Hamilton then continued around the corner with Raikkonen behind him and still on the track. That was a legitimate outbraking manoeuvre in all respects even if done well and truly on the limit. Raikkonen if anything was forced off the track because Kovalainen was inside him with Hamilton in front of both of them. I cannot say whether Kovalainen was at fault however. Hamilton did not force Raikkonen to leave the track.
Les
Les
#182
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the excpetion of Massa's lunge on Hamilton no penalties should have been given on Sunday. Even Massa's was 50/50 to me, but I don't object to it per se. The Bourdais penalty beggars belief and I am at a loss to get my head round how he could have been penalised for that.
The stewards are getitng way too picky IMO, crikey with this sort of carry on I doubt Schumacher would have won a championship or Senna a single race LOL
The stewards are getitng way too picky IMO, crikey with this sort of carry on I doubt Schumacher would have won a championship or Senna a single race LOL
#183
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Far Corfe
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the excpetion of Massa's lunge on Hamilton no penalties should have been given on Sunday. Even Massa's was 50/50 to me, but I don't object to it per se. The Bourdais penalty beggars belief and I am at a loss to get my head round how he could have been penalised for that.
The stewards are getitng way too picky IMO, crikey with this sort of carry on I doubt Schumacher would have won a championship or Senna a single race LOL
The stewards are getitng way too picky IMO, crikey with this sort of carry on I doubt Schumacher would have won a championship or Senna a single race LOL
Good job the FIA dont get involved in the banger racing that is BTCC
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post