Enginetuner 2.1+ stroker engines
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
is 96mm a lot to take a 2.0 to though? i thought they were 92mm to start with?
what displacement would you get with 81mm cranks? and would any other parts need to be different from the 2.1 kit?
how about 83mm crank, would displacement could be achieved with this? and again would you need to change any parts from a 2.1 kit?
what displacement would you get with 81mm cranks? and would any other parts need to be different from the 2.1 kit?
how about 83mm crank, would displacement could be achieved with this? and again would you need to change any parts from a 2.1 kit?
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
is 96mm a lot to take a 2.0 to though? i thought they were 92mm to start with?
what displacement would you get with 81mm cranks? and would any other parts need to be different from the 2.1 kit?
how about 83mm crank, would displacement could be achieved with this? and again would you need to change any parts from a 2.1 kit?
what displacement would you get with 81mm cranks? and would any other parts need to be different from the 2.1 kit?
how about 83mm crank, would displacement could be achieved with this? and again would you need to change any parts from a 2.1 kit?
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere halfway between heaven and hell, some call it earth!
Good god, just as i thought i had it all figured out, along comes a new stroker kit.
Alan, would a EJ22 stroked to 2.33 be worth the extra expense over the CDB EJ20 stroked to 2.29?
Alan, would a EJ22 stroked to 2.33 be worth the extra expense over the CDB EJ20 stroked to 2.29?
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Any volunteers out there? You ask for it, we'll build it!
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Would a S-CDB cope with a 2.3 Stroker?
What are the implications/problems which could arise from it?
Trawling the american ebay they are selling them http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Brian...#ht_4314wt_939
Is it just the size of the crank/rods/pistons which will give the capacity?
What are the implications/problems which could arise from it?
Trawling the american ebay they are selling them http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Brian...#ht_4314wt_939
Is it just the size of the crank/rods/pistons which will give the capacity?
Last edited by chrisdicko; Apr 1, 2010 at 08:15 PM.
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Would a S-CDB cope with a 2.3 Stroker?
What are the implications/problems which could arise from it?
Trawling the american ebay they are selling them http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Brian...#ht_4314wt_939
Is it just the size of the crank/rods/pistons which will give the capacity?
What are the implications/problems which could arise from it?
Trawling the american ebay they are selling them http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Brian...#ht_4314wt_939
Is it just the size of the crank/rods/pistons which will give the capacity?
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
What's a STI8 S-CDB good for power wise?
And where do you get the figure from? Have there been many failures at say 600, so then you'd recommend 500 to be safe for example?
Just I've seen engines fail due to bearings, pistons melting......but never an actual block failure?
And where do you get the figure from? Have there been many failures at say 600, so then you'd recommend 500 to be safe for example?
Just I've seen engines fail due to bearings, pistons melting......but never an actual block failure?
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
What's a STI8 S-CDB good for power wise?
And where do you get the figure from? Have there been many failures at say 600, so then you'd recommend 500 to be safe for example?
Just I've seen engines fail due to bearings, pistons melting......but never an actual block failure?
And where do you get the figure from? Have there been many failures at say 600, so then you'd recommend 500 to be safe for example?
Just I've seen engines fail due to bearings, pistons melting......but never an actual block failure?
My view is that the much publicised block failures posted about aren't what they seem, in that the most likely event was a head gasket seal failure, followed by hydraulic lock splitting the block.
I wouldn't be worried about an S-CDB block at 500 bhp personally.
The ultimate has to be a closed deck of course, we have a number in stock.
Last edited by Alan Jeffery; Apr 14, 2010 at 07:38 AM. Reason: Addition










