Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

you know you own an impreza when...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 March 2008, 07:19 PM
  #121  
rbaz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
rbaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobydazzler
think this more suits him Nacro Mental Health: Home page
PMSL
Old 29 March 2008, 08:10 PM
  #122  
luckham
Scooby Regular
 
luckham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: La La Land
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NACRO
... What he said ...
For someone who purports to be intelligent, I am amazed that you completely failed to grasp the context of this thread.

It was supposed to be humorous..

Not particularly funny humour, [sorry bushiwarrior ], but humour nevertheless.

So please get off your sanctimonious high horse and stop being such a miserable b4stard..

This is a Subaru forum and the usual decorum is to show at least a modicum of respect for the marque and it’s owners.

Coming on here and strutting around telling us how much better your 996 is compared to the ricer cr4p that we drive and then telling us that you think we’re all a bunch of w4nkers isn’t going to win you any friends on here or do you any favours..

So how’s about being a good chap and either run along or play nice eh..

Peace..
Old 29 March 2008, 08:56 PM
  #123  
willswrx
Scooby Regular
 
willswrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: wales - Aberdare Cymraeg Scoobie Club
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NACRO
I'd like to believe that's the case but I think the reality is that there are a number of people on here who seem to have idea they'd be able to drive straight onto a stage.
Sorry to bear bad news, but short of guarding underneath, harnesses and roll cage (which any car woud need for safety) a standard road going impreza is pretty effective on stage.-more so than most. Seen this done on more than one occasion to very good effect.

So please, before you force your opinions, of what you believe to be reality, to a large and potentially knowledgable audience, try doing some research.

As far as the rest of your comments go, get a life.
Some people understand what owning a subaru is all about, others clearly don't. Perhaps your time would be better spent elsewhere. Perhaps you could try the lonely hearts - your're clearly not 'getting any'
Old 29 March 2008, 09:16 PM
  #124  
willswrx
Scooby Regular
 
willswrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: wales - Aberdare Cymraeg Scoobie Club
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

28. if you had an STi, the first thing to go would be the wing

Don't think so.

America maybe
Old 29 March 2008, 09:20 PM
  #125  
rickya
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
rickya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Herts/Middx
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Funny thread, ruined by irrelevant crap about others cars & outdated blah blah ...
Old 29 March 2008, 10:21 PM
  #126  
WRX-DAN
Scooby Regular
 
WRX-DAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by luckham
For someone who purports to be intelligent, I am amazed that you completely failed to grasp the context of this thread.

It was supposed to be humorous..

Not particularly funny humour, [sorry bushiwarrior ], but humour nevertheless.

So please get off your sanctimonious high horse and stop being such a miserable b4stard..

This is a Subaru forum and the usual decorum is to show at least a modicum of respect for the marque and it’s owners.

Coming on here and strutting around telling us how much better your 996 is compared to the ricer cr4p that we drive and then telling us that you think we’re all a bunch of w4nkers isn’t going to win you any friends on here or do you any favours..

So how’s about being a good chap and either run along or play nice eh..

Peace..
LOL! I took the orignal post as a bit of humour, some very serious people on here

Last edited by WRX-DAN; 29 March 2008 at 11:35 PM.
Old 29 March 2008, 10:49 PM
  #127  
NACRO
BANNED
 
NACRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by luckham
For someone who purports to be intelligent, I am amazed that you completely failed to grasp the context of this thread.

It was supposed to be humorous..

Not particularly funny humour, [sorry bushiwarrior ], but humour nevertheless.

So please get off your sanctimonious high horse and stop being such a miserable b4stard..

This is a Subaru forum and the usual decorum is to show at least a modicum of respect for the marque and it’s owners.

Coming on here and strutting around telling us how much better your 996 is compared to the ricer cr4p that we drive and then telling us that you think we’re all a bunch of w4nkers isn’t going to win you any friends on here or do you any favours..

So how’s about being a good chap and either run along or play nice eh..

Peace..
Thanks for the input, I haven't 'purported to be intelligent' and neither have I shown disrespect for the Subaru marque. The exact opposite in fact.

Neither have I called you 'w4nkers' or said you drive 'ricer crap'.

Surely you need to get your facts straight before throwing accusations around? Or would the facts get in the way of your tepid sound bite spin?

Also the person who think a standard Impreza would be 'effective on stage' is living in an alternate reality.
Old 30 March 2008, 06:15 AM
  #128  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A quick question:

If an MX5 and an Impreza go round the same corner, at the same speed and the MX5 spins off into a field, which car is handling better?
Old 30 March 2008, 08:08 AM
  #129  
NACRO
BANNED
 
NACRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
A quick question:

If an MX5 and an Impreza go round the same corner, at the same speed and the MX5 spins off into a field, which car is handling better?
The MX5 but the owner doesn't know how to drive within his or the cars limits.
Old 30 March 2008, 08:43 AM
  #130  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm sorry, but you cannot say that handling and grip are unrelated, although they are differrent to a certain extent, the car that goes around the same corner quicker, is handling better!
Old 30 March 2008, 08:49 AM
  #131  
NACRO
BANNED
 
NACRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
I'm sorry, but you cannot say that handling and grip are unrelated, although they are differrent to a certain extent, the car that goes around the same corner quicker, is handling better!
That's where our opinions differ. I'm of the opinion that just because something can physically go round a corner faster it doesn't necessarily handle better. That's also the opinion of every expert I've ever read or questioned on the subject.

Perhaps the received wisdom is incorrect?
Old 30 March 2008, 09:26 AM
  #132  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As I said the two are different, but not unrelated.

Thanks for your sarcasm though!
Old 30 March 2008, 10:16 AM
  #133  
Mark Mac
Scooby Regular
 
Mark Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very amusing thread. I cant believe one guy Nacro has held center stage and
pressed everyones buttons for so long.
You must take your hat off to him for that.
Well done.........
Old 30 March 2008, 10:18 AM
  #134  
Turbo2
Scooby Regular
 
Turbo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Porsche realised in the 70's that they needed big fat tyres to keep their 930 Turbo on the straight and narrow with all that weight at the back. They intelligently took this a stage further with the 4WD system of the 964 through to today's 997. I have been in them: they GRIP brilliantly, but that doesn't mean your car with 62% of the weight on the back axle (of which a good deal is behind it) HANDLES brilliantly. No other supercar manufacturer has used the rear engined format for decades (it went out 15 years ago with the little-sold Renault A610 I think). That tells us all something.
Old 30 March 2008, 10:27 AM
  #135  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Perhaps this is down to interpretation of the word handling.

I believe what you are talking about are handling characteristics, which are subjective, some people may prefer oversteer, others understeer, some cars may give more feel to the driver. But I maintain that if two cars take the same corner at the same speed and ones spins off, then the other car is handling that corner better.
Old 30 March 2008, 10:56 AM
  #136  
NACRO
BANNED
 
NACRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
Perhaps this is down to interpretation of the word handling.

I believe what you are talking about are handling characteristics, which are subjective, some people may prefer oversteer, others understeer, some cars may give more feel to the driver. But I maintain that if two cars take the same corner at the same speed and ones spins off, then the other car is handling that corner better.
It's gripping better and able to maintain a higher speed.

It isn't necessarily handling better.

No sarcasm intended but perhaps you define it differently to the rest of the world. Entirely your prerogative.
Old 30 March 2008, 10:57 AM
  #137  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But how can a car that's just crashed be "handling better" than one that hasn't?
Old 30 March 2008, 11:13 AM
  #138  
NACRO
BANNED
 
NACRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
But how can a car that's just crashed be "handling better" than one that hasn't?
Maybe the driver was having much more enjoyment right up to the point they binned it?
Old 30 March 2008, 11:26 AM
  #139  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And that relates to handling how?
Old 30 March 2008, 11:29 AM
  #140  
NACRO
BANNED
 
NACRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
And that relates to handling how?
Please go and some reading.

You are confusing 'roadholding' ability and handling in my opinion.
Old 30 March 2008, 11:38 AM
  #141  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can assure you I am not confused, I think you are mistaking driving enjoyment for handling. You appear to believe that if you're having fun while driving, then your car is handling well.

As I said earlier, you are talking about handling characteristics, not how well a car is handling. This is obvious from your comment that the MX5 driver was having more fun until he crashed, which is completely irrelevant!

My personal experience means that I don't have to "do some reading" to understand these things.

But again, your sarcasm is most welcome.
Old 30 March 2008, 11:47 AM
  #142  
NACRO
BANNED
 
NACRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
My personal experience means that I don't have to "do some reading" to understand these things.
I don't believe you understand at all and I haven't the inclination to walk you through it. If you prefer to continue being wrong then that's your choice. It really isn't a problem for me.

We can all benefit from learning more, I'll be doing yet more as it seems like the rain has set in for the day.
Old 30 March 2008, 11:54 AM
  #143  
rbaz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
rbaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NACRO
I don't believe you understand at all and I haven't the inclination to walk you through it. If you prefer to continue being wrong then that's your choice. It really isn't a problem for me.

We can all benefit from learning more, I'll be doing yet more as it seems like the rain has set in for the day.
Rain does that mean the Porker stays in then
Old 30 March 2008, 12:01 PM
  #144  
NACRO
BANNED
 
NACRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rbaz
Rain does that mean the Porker stays in then
Yes, as I had it valeted yesterday and I don't want it to get dirty. I'll probably just go and look at it for a while
Old 30 March 2008, 10:07 PM
  #145  
gt5500
Scooby Regular
 
gt5500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lets clear something up, the word handling is pretty simple, it is used to describe a cars ability to handle being driven either in a straight line or round a corner. Now if a car can get round a corner faster then another car it has handled the corner better therefore it has better handling, it seems that not only do you not understand handling but you haven't even taken the time to think what is meant by the word handling. If car A can take the corner at 30mph without stepping out or understeering and car B can do the same at 50mph then clearly car B handled the corner better. You're right though handling and grip are not the same thing, handling is the result of grip and chassis dynamics added together. A Ford Mustang with massive rear tyres may have amazing grip but has the bodycontrol of an ocean liner therefore its handling is compromised, an MX5 has excellent weight distribution but lacks grip therefore when pushed hard its handling will be compromised.
Old 30 March 2008, 10:14 PM
  #146  
Lemster
Scooby Regular
 
Lemster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can give a 2CV the biggest tyres available and therefore more grip, but the handling will still be appalling!
Old 30 March 2008, 11:00 PM
  #147  
escott
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
escott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SE London
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Grip has an important bearing on handling, but it is not true to say that the car which grips the best is the best handling. For an example, take most 4WD Audis (probably excluding the RS4), generally they grip very well but don't handle great because they understeer, partly due to having the engine set so far forward.

An important part of handling is how a car behaves once it starts to lose grip - most enthusiastic drivers prefer a car which is neutral or loses grip at the back tyres first - i.e. oversteers. A car which does this predictably, progressively and consistently allows the driver more control, and would generally be regarded as a decent handling car.

Older MX5's are a good example of this, as is a properly sorted Impreza - only difference is that the Subaru tends to display these characteristics at a higher speed, due to having more grip.
Old 30 March 2008, 11:08 PM
  #148  
Lemster
Scooby Regular
 
Lemster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by escott
- only difference is that the Subaru tends to display these characteristics at a higher speed, due to having more grip.

This can happen at any speed, just depends on the severity of the bend and how you approach it. I had understeer today on a sharp bend, but that was due to my lapse of concentration. Also had a little lift off oversteer and a mild bend - just depends on how you drive the car and how you unsettle it.

But then again it still handled better than my old Alfa 145, and at a greater velocity!!
Old 31 March 2008, 09:09 AM
  #149  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree with GT5500!
Old 31 March 2008, 09:36 AM
  #150  
scoobian
Scooby Regular
 
scoobian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sunny north east
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think its time this thread died


Quick Reply: you know you own an impreza when...



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM.