Cosworth Sump Baffles
#91
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That wasn't what I had in mind JD, although as you test it to destruction every time you take it out.... Yours is just fine.
The Murtaya has a habit of chucking oil smoke out of the exhaust big style when you restart the car after a full bore flat out start, like drag strip or the Trax 0-60. We know it's getting oil in the breather, and we figured the plate would help sort that one out, hopefully without resorting to catch tanks with oil returns. Bear in mind these are road cars, although we'll do what's required of course. The trouble is, we are seeing more and more cars that are getting marginal with this one, due in part to the torque levels of the 2.5 conversions, we'd like to get to the bottom of it.
As to your question, if the Murtaya stops slinging smoke out in that circumstance, we'll call that a result!
The Murtaya has a habit of chucking oil smoke out of the exhaust big style when you restart the car after a full bore flat out start, like drag strip or the Trax 0-60. We know it's getting oil in the breather, and we figured the plate would help sort that one out, hopefully without resorting to catch tanks with oil returns. Bear in mind these are road cars, although we'll do what's required of course. The trouble is, we are seeing more and more cars that are getting marginal with this one, due in part to the torque levels of the 2.5 conversions, we'd like to get to the bottom of it.
As to your question, if the Murtaya stops slinging smoke out in that circumstance, we'll call that a result!
#92
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I wouldn't let it worry you too much, unless you have one fitted, in which case what's your experience with it?
If im fitting a baffle plate and one of the rubber flaps get sucked through the plate then your baffle plate is now doing very little in the way of baffling, especially if the same happens to a few more..
I also think this issue is being over looked, it tends to suggest there were either some very high crankcase vacumn or some high pressures down the breathers.
Eitherway I wont be fitting one until the issue is resolved, mind you hopefully I can squeeze a dry sump pulley in on the end of the crank and it wont be an issue then.
David
#93
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry David, for a second there you came over as one of those who worry about just about anything! different matter if you are considering one of course. We're all waiting to hear from Cosworth now.
We can't do any more from this end, other than test them ourselves, which we are doing. Despite spending time in a huddle on this one, nobody has yet come up with any reason for any kind of vacuum in the crankcase. As far as I know, Dynamix's car hasn't seen boost at all yet.
Cosworth have a dry sump kit coming out, has to be a good one for track cars, and should stop all those breather problems.
We can't do any more from this end, other than test them ourselves, which we are doing. Despite spending time in a huddle on this one, nobody has yet come up with any reason for any kind of vacuum in the crankcase. As far as I know, Dynamix's car hasn't seen boost at all yet.
Cosworth have a dry sump kit coming out, has to be a good one for track cars, and should stop all those breather problems.
#95
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think they would probably require your first born son as deposit...
#98
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always find the ability to recognise when someone is gently kidding is a useful skill on forums.
#99
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Nottingham with 620BHP & 530lb/ft @1.5bar boost on road fuel.
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#101
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Nottingham with 620BHP & 530lb/ft @1.5bar boost on road fuel.
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#103
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Nottingham with 620BHP & 530lb/ft @1.5bar boost on road fuel.
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<plays devils advocate>
So there is no indication at all that it's fitted on your car, and there is some evidence that it's slowing down the return of oil into the sump on a very similar car.
I think there's a big leap being made at the moment that it's doing anything constructive?
Personally I'd feel safer without one until there's clearer evidence/data as to what and how it's ACTUALLY doing (as opposed to the theory of how it's supposed to help) and I had seriously considered putting one on my own car.
Mike.
So there is no indication at all that it's fitted on your car, and there is some evidence that it's slowing down the return of oil into the sump on a very similar car.
I think there's a big leap being made at the moment that it's doing anything constructive?
Personally I'd feel safer without one until there's clearer evidence/data as to what and how it's ACTUALLY doing (as opposed to the theory of how it's supposed to help) and I had seriously considered putting one on my own car.
Mike.
#105
Scooby Regular
just a quick question.
if the sump was designed for the standard sump setup, then if you alter it isn't it like moving the goal posts? so there wont be any gaurenties that the fitment will be the same?
if the sump was designed for the standard sump setup, then if you alter it isn't it like moving the goal posts? so there wont be any gaurenties that the fitment will be the same?
#106
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
No, I dont think that is what Mike is saying Steve.
As far as I am aware Alan hasnt tested these personally for the benefits that Cosworth say it will bring... ie reduce oil surge/splashing.
Cosworth have only tested these with their wide body big capacity sump - so I am sure that the combination of the two elements does prevent oil starvation. Who am I to question Cosworth technical knowhow.
Sure it isnt doing anything negative with your engine but as yet it is not proven to do anything positive either.
I would say the best solution to the blow by issue is a good catch can set up though where the oil is kept out of the intake system and kept closed loop.
As far as I am aware Alan hasnt tested these personally for the benefits that Cosworth say it will bring... ie reduce oil surge/splashing.
Cosworth have only tested these with their wide body big capacity sump - so I am sure that the combination of the two elements does prevent oil starvation. Who am I to question Cosworth technical knowhow.
Sure it isnt doing anything negative with your engine but as yet it is not proven to do anything positive either.
I would say the best solution to the blow by issue is a good catch can set up though where the oil is kept out of the intake system and kept closed loop.
#108
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
A simple test will prove beyond doubt whats going on.
You have a tapped sump plug, connect a piece of transparent hose to it and elevate the open end.
The actual oil level in the sump can be monitored through the hose as you run the engine.
Andy
You have a tapped sump plug, connect a piece of transparent hose to it and elevate the open end.
The actual oil level in the sump can be monitored through the hose as you run the engine.
Andy
#109
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The plate appears to have 4 or 5 cut openings that are not controlled by the one way rubber flaps, ie continually open. I can't see how this plate could hold up 4 ltrs of oil
#110
#114
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Regadless of whether it destroys the engine at idle or not, the point is, if it is only holding up 2 litres and still showing a decent reading, there is 2 litres of oil less in the sump to be swilled around under cornering forces - surely this will make cavitation even more likely in the exact circumstances that it is supposed to be offering protection?
#115
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just one point here. If the breather system D is currently using allows as much as a litre of oil to escape into it, ( which is the whole problem!) then the sump is short by at least one litre every time you put your foot down, as it's contained in the catch tank and return. I'm only saying this to illustrate the possible issues in the round, rather than trying to criticise anybody!
Once again, where I'm coming from are situations where it's marginal on road cars. JD's car didn't have a problem to start with, as his breather system has proven adequate so far. His car puts out a very smooth 420 bhp on a GT30 and SimTek so not a Time Attack spec car. Personally, I CAN see the potential benefits, and I can only assume Scooby Mania did as well or they wouldn't have fitted one.
We most certainly had a problem with the Murtaya, and I expect the fitting of the plate to cure it. As it happens we stripped the car anyway, as we are moving on and up power wise, and fitting a new charge cooler set up.
Any further tests by us will have to wait for that. (1 week hopefully)
Once again, where I'm coming from are situations where it's marginal on road cars. JD's car didn't have a problem to start with, as his breather system has proven adequate so far. His car puts out a very smooth 420 bhp on a GT30 and SimTek so not a Time Attack spec car. Personally, I CAN see the potential benefits, and I can only assume Scooby Mania did as well or they wouldn't have fitted one.
We most certainly had a problem with the Murtaya, and I expect the fitting of the plate to cure it. As it happens we stripped the car anyway, as we are moving on and up power wise, and fitting a new charge cooler set up.
Any further tests by us will have to wait for that. (1 week hopefully)
#116
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Just one point here. If the breather system D is currently using allows as much as a litre of oil to escape into it, ( which is the whole problem!) then the sump is short by at least one litre every time you put your foot down, as it's contained in the catch tank and return. I'm only saying this to illustrate the possible issues in the round, rather than trying to criticise anybody!
It fills due to the splashing of oil in the sump causing oil to collect in the heads and out of the head breathers under prolonged high g cornering. In my case it goes into the catch can and returns to the sump at the same time keeping oil levels pretty close to what is acceptable. The problem that I was wishing to solve with the plate was to stop the splashing or at least slow it down. That is why I asked them to source and fit one - not their suggestion.
To have the baffle plate slow down the rate of return to the sump in a static situation where there was no boost, no oil in the catch can was very worrying and I hope that it hasnt done any damage to my bearings.
The systems that you are talking about Alan seem to be following the std set up of feeding this breather mix of oil and air into the intake. Whereas I agree that this is ok for the road, but is there really an oil surge problem on the road to solve for them either?
#117
Scooby Regular
breather system on mine.
has a RCM catch tank fitted which collects from heads and crankcase, but pcv still connected. Therefore under no boost the pcv still operates under normal conditions, but under boost the pcv closes but instead of venting back into the inlet tract (as per standard) mine vents to the catch tank and on to atmosphere.
has a RCM catch tank fitted which collects from heads and crankcase, but pcv still connected. Therefore under no boost the pcv still operates under normal conditions, but under boost the pcv closes but instead of venting back into the inlet tract (as per standard) mine vents to the catch tank and on to atmosphere.
#118
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This subject is too complex for this format!
My fingers would get sore.
Hi Dynamix - Of course your engine doesn't chuck out a litre of oil on start up!
I think we all know that.
My point is that it has been commonly reported by those who run high power cars that they can lob out a litre or more into the breather on full chat..
And that's why you were seeking a solution, yes? Otherwise, why did you fit one in the first place? Being fair here, I have no opinion on your car, as it isn't in my garage, and I can't pass comment on something I'm not involved with, other than to speculate. I wish sometimes other people would adopt the same constraints! I sincerely wish you didn't have any aggro with your car at all, but hey, it's machinery, and we all have to put up with some of that.
I say again, we haven't had big issues with the road cars. YET. But they are MARGINAL, and that's why I took an interest in the Cosworth baffle plate.
A number of our customers are going drag racing, we are sponsoring a local series, and a few want to do track days, so the need may be more pressing soon!
My fingers would get sore.
Hi Dynamix - Of course your engine doesn't chuck out a litre of oil on start up!
I think we all know that.
My point is that it has been commonly reported by those who run high power cars that they can lob out a litre or more into the breather on full chat..
And that's why you were seeking a solution, yes? Otherwise, why did you fit one in the first place? Being fair here, I have no opinion on your car, as it isn't in my garage, and I can't pass comment on something I'm not involved with, other than to speculate. I wish sometimes other people would adopt the same constraints! I sincerely wish you didn't have any aggro with your car at all, but hey, it's machinery, and we all have to put up with some of that.
I say again, we haven't had big issues with the road cars. YET. But they are MARGINAL, and that's why I took an interest in the Cosworth baffle plate.
A number of our customers are going drag racing, we are sponsoring a local series, and a few want to do track days, so the need may be more pressing soon!
#119
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
Restraint - yup, so do I Alan.
Oil surge/blowby/splashing or whatever on launch hasnt been a problem (yet) but then I have to confess at not having the clutch or power to really test the std sump on that one - plus its a lardage so a fair old beast to launch
I guess the murtaya is marginally quicker out of the blocks - that looks awesome to me and I hope that the trials of the plate work well on it.
I certainly am still pretty confused (it would have been too easy to say baffled again lol) as to why it didnt on mine.
Oil surge/blowby/splashing or whatever on launch hasnt been a problem (yet) but then I have to confess at not having the clutch or power to really test the std sump on that one - plus its a lardage so a fair old beast to launch
I guess the murtaya is marginally quicker out of the blocks - that looks awesome to me and I hope that the trials of the plate work well on it.
I certainly am still pretty confused (it would have been too easy to say baffled again lol) as to why it didnt on mine.
#120
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aren't we all! It's certainly kicked off a debate on both sides of The Pond I can tell you!