He bought his 1st property for £50k and sold it at a loss?

The £25k never exists then surely? If he sold it for £45k say, you've lost £2500 straight away You expect his equity now, but not his loss at the time?

I agree this is a friday afternoon windup. Well done (Where's PSL by the way )

 

You have to see if from my viewpoint, if my son had not sold his first house, I would have been legally entitled to 50% of whatever that is worth now and it is a lot more than the original 25k. And there was nothing he could do about it as he had signed the legally binding agreement.

I don't care whether you think it is morally wrong, I am just interested in where I stand under the laws of this country with regard to what is MY investment and how I go about getting it back!

 

This is not a wind up and I would like to read the views of pslewis if he knows where I stand legally.

 

Exactly that 'IF'

He did sell though and your legally allowed 50% of the sale value of THAT home which i believe was actually less than £25000

The new home legally is irrelevant, you dont have your grubby paws in that

 

And nobody gives a flying **** about you or your pathetic little trolling miserable excuse for a life

Thought the tone of writing seemed familiar

 

 

PSL at it again is he

 

Happy to help those less able.

 

You know, after about the 5th post, I was gonna post " Pete, is that you?"

I wish I had now. How many aliases is that Pete?

 

I thought this sounded like PSL from the begining as well.


Just for the entertainment value though, I'll go along with it for now..

So Charliethedog, how much was the first house sold for? You say it was at a loss, so I hope you are not expecting your original 25k back.

 

sold for 45k BUT I thought that the agreement carried over to the new house and I did not need the money at that time. I have now found out that this agreement only applied to the house that was sold.

So 22.5k I would have got from the sale.

So is that all I can ask for or has my son got all the money legally in his house now?

 

I'd definitely ask legal questions on a car forum.

 

why not! Do solicitors not drive cars, maybe they might drive a scooby, you never know!

 

My word, has pslewis suddenly become a solicitor?

Methinks this is just trolling. Anyone care to press the little red "x" and do the forum a favor?

 

22.5k and a decent shout of inflation indexation. I would think between 30 and 32k would be accurate

 

i doubt Pete could make this up! hes trawling the net for silly little deals!
ha ha Charliethedog your so foolish! fancy getting fuct out of 25k by your own son! what a thicko lol! you obviously didnt pass the thick gene on tho! your son probably new what he was doing! he also knows you cant sort it out as hes probably reding your post too!

hey mate if you wanna invest in my house feel free! i could do eith the free cash

 

You obviously didn't show up at school for English lessons.


(oops - forgot to add ! )

 

no mate i didnt! you obviously didnt show up for name choosing lessons!
"fast bloke" thats a good one!

 

is your ! key stuck! if I was going to post calling som!eone a thicko! I would! at least make a small effort to! pretend I wasnt a thicko.!!!! but i bet you new that anyway!

 

hmmmm - I see you edited out the bit were you called me a ****! So if I infract you now will the webbie be able to see the original version?

 

oh no - I've got myself a Friday stalker

 

In the early '90s Next shares fell to 7p each. I wished I had bought a 1,000 as four years later they were trading for £7.90.

Does anyone know where I stand legally?

Can I sue the LSE for trading Next shares at 7p and allowing them to increase in value and make a market for them at £7.90p