Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

My experience with Mocom Racing £400.00 mapping.......

Old Aug 20, 2007 | 04:07 PM
  #31  
J_sca001's Avatar
J_sca001
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: In your MOMMA!!!!
Default

Originally Posted by bob r
the figures do seem very poor to me. Wasn't this the car that many said could go 350 ?
Personally I would be asking questions..............I know figures aren't everything (it's all about how it drives ) but with any increse in power you will see a improvement but I think you sould see a better improvement than that.
Can't and don't want to slag off Mocom, but is does appear to be a poor increase. I've just booked it in to Powerstation for tomorrow for a "power run". No doubt their figure will be totally different to

Anybody know my question about the headers???
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 05:25 PM
  #32  
ScoobyDoo69's Avatar
ScoobyDoo69
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 3
From: WMI
Default

Powerstation are meant to be quite conservative... so just don't be disappointed if it's below 300bhp..
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #33  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Originally Posted by J_sca001
Flywheel figure was 250 bhp !!!

So these after market headers and up-pipe i have fitted. Am i right in thinking they will up the torque and bhp in the high rev range?

I would prefer speed off the line than top end.Would i achieve this by putting my standard headers back on???
after market headers and particularly up-pipe may well be too big - this would hurt spool up of the turbo and that would affect torque right the way up the rev range and ultimately BHP - that would be my guess. They dont generally need to be changed until over 400bhp at least with the likes of Andy F runnign OE headers on his Spec C even at a lot more than that.

Delta Dash Road Dyno is the same for all users - start at low revs (1250 rpm iirc) and take it up on WOT to the redline. This will produce a more acurate guestimate than any dyno as it is taken in real world conditions.

Sure you could hop around from dyno to dyno to chase figures but what would it achieve - some read high than others, some measure coast down losses, some guess using a factor, some are just made up full stop depending on what the operator wants you to see or buy from them?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #34  
Mocom Racing's Avatar
Mocom Racing
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Default

To be fair I chose to map it conservatively as it required a little over 3ltrs of oil to bring it up to level and there was no way of knowing if any damage had/has been caused whilst running with just 1.5ltrs and I didn't want to get the blame for a lost bearing or two.

As far as the induction side goes I saw a 28bhp increase from an STi today changing the OE airbox to a RCMS K&N induction.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 05:50 PM
  #35  
B0DSKI's Avatar
B0DSKI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 1
From: Owner of BrCarDetailing
Default

Originally Posted by Mocom Racing
To be fair I chose to map it conservatively as it required a little over 3ltrs of oil to bring it up to level and there was no way of knowing if any damage had/has been caused whilst running with just 1.5ltrs and I didn't want to get the blame for a lost bearing or two.

As far as the induction side goes I saw a 28bhp increase from an STi today changing the OE airbox to a RCMS K&N induction.
ZAK DONT TELL ME THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just paid for the bleedin holiday to Florida
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #36  
Diesel_DC's Avatar
Diesel_DC
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 0
From: Back in Diesel wonderland - 3.0 TDi Quattro A4, with more toys than Ann Summers...lol
Default

Originally Posted by Mocom Racing
To be fair I chose to map it conservatively as it required a little over 3ltrs of oil to bring it up to level and there was no way of knowing if any damage had/has been caused whilst running with just 1.5ltrs and I didn't want to get the blame for a lost bearing or two.

As far as the induction side goes I saw a 28bhp increase from an STi today changing the OE airbox to a RCMS K&N induction.
I can totally agree with this comment as it was my car

it feels like a different car, just keeps pulling

Nice one Zak
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 07:24 AM
  #37  
B0DSKI's Avatar
B0DSKI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 1
From: Owner of BrCarDetailing
Default

Whats the sound of the RCM Induction kit like ???
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 07:44 AM
  #38  
J_sca001's Avatar
J_sca001
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: In your MOMMA!!!!
Default

Originally Posted by dynamix
after market headers and particularly up-pipe may well be too big - this would hurt spool up of the turbo and that would affect torque right the way up the rev range and ultimately BHP - that would be my guess. They dont generally need to be changed until over 400bhp at least with the likes of Andy F runnign OE headers on his Spec C even at a lot more than that.

Delta Dash Road Dyno is the same for all users - start at low revs (1250 rpm iirc) and take it up on WOT to the redline. This will produce a more acurate guestimate than any dyno as it is taken in real world conditions.

Sure you could hop around from dyno to dyno to chase figures but what would it achieve - some read high than others, some measure coast down losses, some guess using a factor, some are just made up full stop depending on what the operator wants you to see or buy from them?
Thanks for that
So if i went back to my original headers would i need to have another re-map? Also how would replacing the original headers effect the fueling?.
Cheers
Jamie
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 08:31 AM
  #39  
Diesel_DC's Avatar
Diesel_DC
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 0
From: Back in Diesel wonderland - 3.0 TDi Quattro A4, with more toys than Ann Summers...lol
Default

Originally Posted by B0DSKI
Whats the sound of the RCM Induction kit like ???


Sounds V nice
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 08:33 AM
  #40  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Originally Posted by J_sca001
Thanks for that
So if i went back to my original headers would i need to have another re-map? Also how would replacing the original headers effect the fueling?.
Cheers
Jamie
Yes

Not sure how it would affect fuelling but it would affect spool up, engine loads and boost.

Have a chat with zak
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #41  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Std airbox on the 01 onwards cars is not an issue up to mid 300's. I have ran 400+ through it but it was starting to cause a restriction at that.
Beware of fitting induction kits too early as this can cause compressor surge and this will limit midrange torque.
Shaun (webby) documents this well in his thread, up to 350bhp and similar torque on his JDM was on the OE airbox, I think he got another few bhp with an induction but surge was an issue.

Andy
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #42  
Henrik's Avatar
Henrik
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 151
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by J_sca001
Flywheel figure was 250 bhp !!!

So these after market headers and up-pipe i have fitted. Am i right in thinking they will up the torque and bhp in the high rev range?

I would prefer speed off the line than top end.Would i achieve this by putting my standard headers back on???
You can still have power off the line, you just need to launch it harder

Have you got a graph of the power / torque by any chance?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 09:03 AM
  #43  
J_sca001's Avatar
J_sca001
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: In your MOMMA!!!!
Default

Thanks all

As for graph, not yet, Zak said he will email it to me.

Going on the rolling road at 11.00 at Power Station. I appreciate they all give different readings and the road is better but i just want to compare it to the road reading Zak took for me.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 07:57 AM
  #44  
Diesel_DC's Avatar
Diesel_DC
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,984
Likes: 0
From: Back in Diesel wonderland - 3.0 TDi Quattro A4, with more toys than Ann Summers...lol
Default

Well,

what sort of figures did you get from the rollers?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #45  
J_sca001's Avatar
J_sca001
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: In your MOMMA!!!!
Default

Zak's technical stuff is very accurate as figures were within 2-3 BHP of Zaks 305 maximum reading.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #46  
Mocom Racing's Avatar
Mocom Racing
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Default

Originally Posted by J_sca001
Zak's technical stuff is very accurate as figures were within 2-3 BHP of Zaks 305 maximum reading.
Not bad with the IAM running at 8 on the rollers.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 05:40 PM
  #47  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Originally Posted by Mocom Racing
Not bad with the IAM running at 8 on the rollers.
Any ideas as to why it dropped? .... the normal heat issues with dynos?

That must have been robbing it of loads of power.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 05:52 PM
  #48  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Are we finding out the JDM is not as straightforward as the UK to tune

Andy
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #49  
J_sca001's Avatar
J_sca001
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: In your MOMMA!!!!
Default

It is due to be sorted, very soon
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #50  
frayz's Avatar
frayz
Essex Area Moderator
Essex Subaru Owners Club Badge
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 19,945
Likes: 2
From: "Engineering Perfection in Essex"
Default

Originally Posted by Mocom Racing
Not bad with the IAM running at 8 on the rollers.
Why couldnt it be done at 16???
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #51  
marmski's Avatar
marmski
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by J_sca001
Flywheel figure was 250 bhp !!!

So these after market headers and up-pipe i have fitted. Am i right in thinking they will up the torque and bhp in the high rev range?

I would prefer speed off the line than top end.Would i achieve this by putting my standard headers back on???
I may be asking a stupid question... but:

Is the standard car not a 265BHP car at the Flywheel? How can your figure (after mods and remap) be 250BHP at the Flywheel?

Surely its closer to 250BHP at the wheels, meaning somewhere around 320-330BHP at the Fly?

Im jus confused how ur remap has apparently given you less power than the standard STi setup gave you?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 10:29 PM
  #52  
Mocom Racing's Avatar
Mocom Racing
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
Are we finding out the JDM is not as straightforward as the UK to tune
Dare I say it Andy but I do believe I may have more experience than even you with the JDM model
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #53  
Marky9074's Avatar
Marky9074
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 939
Likes: 1
From: Isle of Sheppey, Kent - FSTi/TTR V6 DSG
Default

Originally Posted by Mocom Racing
Dare I say it Andy but I do believe I may have more experience than even you with the JDM model
oooohhh fighting talk
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #54  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Originally Posted by marmski
I may be asking a stupid question... but:

Is the standard car not a 265BHP car at the Flywheel? How can your figure (after mods and remap) be 250BHP at the Flywheel?

Surely its closer to 250BHP at the wheels, meaning somewhere around 320-330BHP at the Fly?

Im jus confused how ur remap has apparently given you less power than the standard STi setup gave you?
yes he made a mistake - he meant to say at the Wheels
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 07:28 AM
  #55  
J_sca001's Avatar
J_sca001
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: In your MOMMA!!!!
Default

Originally Posted by Mocom Racing
Dare I say it Andy but I do believe I may have more experience than even you with the JDM model
One point to Zak i fear

1

Your serve Andy
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #56  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Talking

Originally Posted by Mocom Racing
Dare I say it Andy but I do believe I may have more experience than even you with the JDM model

If you have been mapping 10-15 Imprezas EVERY week, full time for the last 4 years and owned a JDM all that time yourself to experiment on..... then perhaps you would have.

I do however know when you started dabbling in open source mapping and that you were asking some very basic questions not so very long ago.

Andy
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #57  
J_sca001's Avatar
J_sca001
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: In your MOMMA!!!!
Default

OUCH!!

I wouldn't stand for that Zak
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 11:12 AM
  #58  
Snazy's Avatar
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
From: S.E London
Default

lol the one who wins this fight, is the one I will go to if I go down that route lol..

Just kiddin. Always interesting to read a decent technical thread
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 01:00 PM
  #59  
J_sca001's Avatar
J_sca001
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: In your MOMMA!!!!
Default

Surprised Zak stood for that!!!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 01:07 PM
  #60  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

No-one can win discussions like this on an internet forum.

A slanging match will do no-one any good.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 AM.