Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

More Police powers - for the war on terror

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02 June 2007, 04:55 AM
  #91  
Felix.
Scooby Regular
 
Felix.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jonno_johnson
More police powers, disgusting why should people be stopped on the street if they are doing no wrong, who gives that jobsworth copper the power to decide he looks dodgey, and go and hassle them for ten minutes. *
Fine. So if I see two ‘dodgey looking’ lads walking around an estate at 3.30 in the morning I’ll just leave them be. Hopefully they won’t burgle you house. And if they do, don’t moan when I say ‘Ah yes, I saw these two half an hour ago, but I didn’t stop them’

Originally Posted by Jonno_johnson
Some copper left his black case on top of my mates car the other week when he pulled him over, the copper drove off and my mate took the case back home, later that night he gets arrested, by this power trip copper, for perverting the course of justice, and is up at court next week, lol it makes you sick this copper left it his own fault, my mate did nothing with the case expect take it home, and was going to phone the police when he got the chance. *note he doesnt have a landline*
How’s this perverting the course of justice…..?

He must be involved in another case for PCJ. If there is any offence, it is a very week theft, but that’s it. Tell him to get a solicitor.
Old 02 June 2007, 05:10 AM
  #92  
Felix.
Scooby Regular
 
Felix.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boomer
So try to explain the 43% fall in all crime then!!!
Its all to do with not recording crimes or reclassifying crimes as something else to make Mr Mallon look good. There is no way you can half crime. What did all the heroin addicts do – suddenly stop overnight…. This is why they brough in NCRS (National Crime Recording Standards)



Originally Posted by boomer
For the record, Ray Mallon was suspended on trumped-up charges for four and a half years, unable to do his job. He wanted out from a corrupt organisation and to try to become Mayor of Middlesbrough, but the CC Barry Shaw refused to accept his resignation, so he was forced to admit guilt to get out of the enforced limbo that he was in. He pleaded guilty, offered no mitigation and asked simply to be dismissed.

Oh, and surprise, surprise, in 2002 he did become Mayor, with a massive majority - despite admitting to "major wrong doings"!!!!! mb
For the record – Mr Mallon was not the only one to be investigated; there were loads of people who were sacked under Mr Mallon. Lancet took so long because Mr Mallon forced and investigation into Lancet itself. And all the time he was on full pay and he kept himself in the public eye. Another reason was that the investigation involved persons from the drug world who are obviously hard to get hold of. It’s alleged that Mallon was one of the biggest dealers in Middlesbrough (I of course can’t possibly comment)

And what has Mr Mallon done since he has taken office……. Since he controls the police budget and the police authority, he hasn’t continued with his huge crime reduction rate. His popularity is dropping rapidly in Middlesbrough
Old 02 June 2007, 05:20 AM
  #93  
Felix.
Scooby Regular
 
Felix.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scrappydoo
Talking about liberties, found out the other day that that the Statue of Liberty is in fact a pagan occult symbol owned by the euopean union
OMG I didn’t know that. Well that changes everything. Well the police should take a back seat on this and go around on space hoppers.

Talking further about liberties – I just found out that R2D2 is not real and there was a man inside it all the time



Originally Posted by scrappydoo
the other day i pulled upto a junction and looked up at a CCTV camera turned completly the wrong way from town and looking directly into a young womans bedroom and it was active cos it was adjusting every so slightly. OHHH IM SO GLAD WE HAVE THEM THOUGH, INVADING OUR PRIVACY LIKE THAT. THAT GIRL COULD OF BEEN A TERRORIST FOR ALL WE KNOW!! GOOD PRO-ACTIVE STANCE THERE MR CCTV-MAN..

Or she could have been phoning to say she was being attacked, or a domestic was going on, child cruelty, officers already in the flat, drugs raid, sudden death………
Old 02 June 2007, 07:36 AM
  #94  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scrappydoo
the other day i pulled upto a junction and looked up at a CCTV camera turned completly the wrong way from town and looking directly into a young womans bedroom and it was active cos it was adjusting every so slightly. OHHH IM SO GLAD WE HAVE THEM THOUGH, INVADING OUR PRIVACY LIKE THAT. THAT GIRL COULD OF BEEN A TERRORIST FOR ALL WE KNOW!! GOOD PRO-ACTIVE STANCE THERE MR CCTV-MAN..


Spot the post straight from the "Big Book of Urban Myths"
Old 02 June 2007, 07:51 AM
  #95  
swampster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
swampster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oo'p Norf
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If there's any evidence to suggest why Police shouldn't have more powers because they're just likely to get abused..
Police send four police officers to tackle boy, 11, who called schoolmate 'gay' | the Daily Mail

If they can do this kind of thing now... just imagine with all sorts of new powers. This kid might have been on the next non-stop to Guantanamo!

It's this bit makes me laugh...
Last October the Daily Mail revealed how 14-year-old Codie Scott was arrested and thrown in a police cell for almost four hours after she was accused of racism for refusing to sit next to a group of Asian pupils in her class.

Teachers reported the youngster, from Harrop Fold High School in Worsley, Greater Manchester, after she claimed it was impossible for her to get involved in the class 'discussion' because only one of the Asian pupils spoke English.

She had her fingerprints and DNA taken but was eventually released without charge.
Why the hell was there the need to take her fingerprints and DNA sample?

Last edited by swampster; 02 June 2007 at 07:55 AM.
Old 02 June 2007, 10:40 AM
  #97  
Felix.
Scooby Regular
 
Felix.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hutton_d
- PARK UP WHERE THEY KNOW YOU'RE THERE!!!!

Dave
Of course. Because Billy Burglar always walks down the same street at the same time wearing a black and white hoped t-shirt and carrying a bag with ‘SWAG’ written on it.

And obviously you wont want us to stop him until he’s done something…..
Old 02 June 2007, 10:45 AM
  #98  
scoobynutta555
Scooby Regular
 
scoobynutta555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by Paul3446
Spot the post straight from the "Big Book of Urban Myths"
Yeah ok mate

BBC NEWS | England | Merseyside | Peeping tom CCTV workers jailed
Old 02 June 2007, 10:46 AM
  #99  
Felix.
Scooby Regular
 
Felix.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swampster
If there's any evidence to suggest why Police shouldn't have more powers................
And of course the papers report the full facts of the case. The girl has obviously done something more as there is no offence or refusing to sit next to someone.

Fingerprints and DNA are taken from all people who are arrested.
Old 02 June 2007, 11:43 AM
  #100  
Jonno_johnson
Scooby Regular
 
Jonno_johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rush Rush to the yeyo
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Felix.
Fine. So if I see two ‘dodgey looking’ lads walking around an estate at 3.30 in the morning I’ll just leave them be. Hopefully they won’t burgle you house. And if they do, don’t moan when I say ‘Ah yes, I saw these two half an hour ago, but I didn’t stop them’
Ok i can understand that, the point i was making which i should have made more clear was during normal daytime, if i was walking around at half three in the morning and it was obvious i was not coming home from a night on the beer clubbing and i was stopped i would have no problem with that, if i was stopped just walking to the shop during the day then the problem begins.


Originally Posted by Felix.
0How’s this perverting the course of justice…..?

He must be involved in another case for PCJ. If there is any offence, it is a very week theft, but that’s it. Tell him to get a solicitor.
No idea why they have charged him with it, but he is definatly charged with it, they also have charged him with theft by finding aswell, i was speaking to him about it last night, hes up at court next week, and is worried he might get jail time due to the perverting the course of justice charge, ive told him i think it will get dropped sooner or later, but he is worried about it.
Old 02 June 2007, 11:47 AM
  #101  
Hoppy
Scooby Regular
 
Hoppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Where age and treachery reins over youthful exuberance
Posts: 5,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm with you Felix, and not with all the daydreamers. The world has changed. Crime of all sorts is a major worry. Fact.

All this tosh about a police state and erosion of freedoms is purely hypothetical. This has never been a 'free country' and never will be. We all need some social controls.

The cost of policing Britain to the extent some people fear is prohibative, but if we can make present resources more efficient, I'm all for that.

Richard.
Old 02 June 2007, 11:58 AM
  #102  
Felix.
Scooby Regular
 
Felix.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Jonno

But why should the time of day make any difference. Most burglaries happen during daylight hours between 0900 – 1500. If you can see my point about stopping them during the night, then given the same set of circumstances, why should anything change for the daytime.

Depending on his history, your mate shouldn’t get any jail time. I still don’t see how this PCJ. It does seem wrong what has happened, and if it was me I would have knocked on his door, said thank you for my case and left it at that.

Last edited by Felix.; 02 June 2007 at 11:59 AM. Reason: missed name
Old 02 June 2007, 12:01 PM
  #103  
Jonno_johnson
Scooby Regular
 
Jonno_johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rush Rush to the yeyo
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Felix.
Jonno



Depending on his history, your mate shouldn’t get any jail time. I still don’t see how this PCJ. It does seem wrong what has happened, and if it was me I would have knocked on his door, said thank you for my case and left it at that.
The reason the officer gave for pcj charge was that he could have looked in the case and removed documents, or saw facts about someone, i know he never removed any dcouments, as hes told me he never and i cant see why he would lie to me, about that. I still think it will get dropped at some stage, as surely there is no case to answer imo.


As for stopping people during the daytime, how can you tell who is dodgey or not?

Last edited by Jonno_johnson; 02 June 2007 at 12:07 PM.
Old 02 June 2007, 04:27 PM
  #104  
boomer
Scooby Senior
 
boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Taking Liberties (since 1997)



mb
Old 02 June 2007, 04:54 PM
  #105  
scrappydoo
Scooby Regular
 
scrappydoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

...

Last edited by scrappydoo; 02 May 2008 at 04:27 AM. Reason: privacy!
Old 02 June 2007, 05:01 PM
  #106  
boomer
Scooby Senior
 
boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Felix.
Its all to do with not recording crimes or reclassifying crimes as something else
We have heard it from the horses mouth - don't trust ANY crime statistics, 'cos they are all fiddled

Originally Posted by Felix.
It’s alleged that Mallon was one of the biggest dealers in Middlesbrough (I of course can’t possibly comment)
You need to be very careful saying things like that!!

Originally Posted by Felix.
His popularity is dropping rapidly in Middlesbrough
Is it??

mb
p.s. We might disagree on things, but i am very impressed by your tenacity
Old 03 June 2007, 01:10 PM
  #107  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoppy
I'm with you Felix, and not with all the daydreamers. The world has changed. Crime of all sorts is a major worry. Fact.

All this tosh about a police state and erosion of freedoms is purely hypothetical. This has never been a 'free country' and never will be. We all need some social controls.

The cost of policing Britain to the extent some people fear is prohibative, but if we can make present resources more efficient, I'm all for that.

Richard.
I cant agree with that Hoppy. The real concern is that if the authorities are given such powers, it will be a corrupting influence and not only will we have to be made to feel as though we can be under suspicion at the drop of a hat, but it is also yet another step to the complete suppression of all our personal freedoms. Those powers will be further increased in time and eventually you could find yourself being banged up just for uttering a word out of turn. Rather like that elderly man at the NL party conference who was bundled out by a pair of thugs and then held by the police under the prevention of terrorism act!

Our freedoms are worth so much more, especially in these days of corrupt and self seeking politicians, that we cannot sensibly allow them to be whittled away. Let those who made us a major terrorist target for their own purposes by devious means find a better way to protect the public without making eventual slaves to the ruling administrators of us all.

Les
Old 03 June 2007, 03:07 PM
  #108  
Hoppy
Scooby Regular
 
Hoppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Where age and treachery reins over youthful exuberance
Posts: 5,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
I cant agree with that Hoppy. The real concern is that if the authorities are given such powers, it will be a corrupting influence and not only will we have to be made to feel as though we can be under suspicion at the drop of a hat, but it is also yet another step to the complete suppression of all our personal freedoms. Those powers will be further increased in time and eventually you could find yourself being banged up just for uttering a word out of turn. Rather like that elderly man at the NL party conference who was bundled out by a pair of thugs and then held by the police under the prevention of terrorism act!

Our freedoms are worth so much more, especially in these days of corrupt and self seeking politicians, that we cannot sensibly allow them to be whittled away. Let those who made us a major terrorist target for their own purposes by devious means find a better way to protect the public without making eventual slaves to the ruling administrators of us all.

Les
Les I absolutely understand where you're coming from, and I don't like where we're heading, either

However, it's a choice between better control of the social problems we already have, and the purely speculative problems of implementing that control in the future. It must be done carefully, and democratically.

At the moment, we are stuck with a police force faced with a mass of criminal offences, but without the proper measures in place to manage them directly. That's why we get the rules bent by the police etc, because they don'y have specific authority. So they make something up, as per your example.

Simple, clear and strict rules are much better than some of the vague and bendy ones we have at present.

Richard.
Old 03 June 2007, 11:24 PM
  #109  
swampster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
swampster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oo'p Norf
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Felix.
And of course the papers report the full facts of the case. The girl has obviously done something more as there is no offence or refusing to sit next to someone.

Fingerprints and DNA are taken from all people who are arrested.
Oh yes of course she must have done something more for them to release her without charge..

I'll bet they didn't remove her DNA details from the database, just like the hordes of innocent people who are going to get rounded up for "corroboration" of the details they provided when questioned as they were going about their business perfectly innocently!
Old 04 June 2007, 12:31 PM
  #110  
pwhittle
Scooby Regular
 
pwhittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
Like that's REALLY going to help *waves goodbye to civil liberties*

I hate the feckin rozzers now, just imagine what those jumped up space cadets will be like with this new power to stop and bother you
that's been happening for years anyway. We used to get stopped as kids, just for sitting down chatting. They'd ask where we lived and move us on. This wasn't AFAIK allowed under any law at the time, but kids are hardly likely to kick up a fuss.
Old 05 June 2007, 01:21 PM
  #111  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoppy
Les I absolutely understand where you're coming from, and I don't like where we're heading, either

However, it's a choice between better control of the social problems we already have, and the purely speculative problems of implementing that control in the future. It must be done carefully, and democratically.

At the moment, we are stuck with a police force faced with a mass of criminal offences, but without the proper measures in place to manage them directly. That's why we get the rules bent by the police etc, because they don'y have specific authority. So they make something up, as per your example.

Simple, clear and strict rules are much better than some of the vague and bendy ones we have at present.

Richard.
I think the law as it stands is already adequate for dealing with the problems. In many ways the police are defeated however by the Human Rights Act nonsense and also the non punishments meted out by the PC judicial system and their PC self seeking senior officers.

Les
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Davalar
General Technical
19
30 September 2015 08:54 PM
Ozne
General Technical
2
27 September 2015 03:06 PM



Quick Reply: More Police powers - for the war on terror



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 AM.