JIGGY'S VERSION 8 370BHP S202
Scooby Regular
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 0
From: Bebind the wheel of my red rice rocket
Originally Posted by M5scoob
Well just like your name tells me a bit about you (SHAM S202)
....so does mine, I drive an Interlagos Met Blue M5 and a Black 2006 Spec C Impreza. ...clear now are we...by the way which one are you Salt or Pepper (or P Diddy/Dre/feckin NWA) ??Oh and before you ask neither of them have pimp tints, neons, 22 inch rims, etc...I grew out of the LA Lakers vest wearing, fried chicken chewing, water mellon loving, pretending to be of african decent rapper stylee a long, long time ago.
Really mate, trust me on this one...GIVE UP THE STREET TALK - YOU SOUND LIKE A BERK!
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Manchester
Originally Posted by rb5 jeff
So after six pages and me CBA to look through em all what exactly are these two cars then?
Bad news !!!
Bad news !!!
Scooby Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Originally Posted by scooter(WRX03 PPP)
That blue car has had 5 previous owners in the last 3 years !!!
perhaps if they tried to sell it for what it is instead of what they wish it was, it would sell and stay sold
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham
Originally Posted by Tidgy
wonder y?????
perhaps if they tried to sell it for what it is instead of what they wish it was, it would sell and stay sold
perhaps if they tried to sell it for what it is instead of what they wish it was, it would sell and stay sold
By the way I fink you is all well outta order to sham, I bet he is cryin into his lakers shirt as we speak. "Aiii, I is gonna tell mi crew dat you is all pickin on me!!"
Scooby Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Originally Posted by Mangel
Whats that then, a freaked out, stickered up, non hybrid, hybrid, potential ringer, write off, with mis matched parts and a serious identity crisis!!!
By the way I fink you is all well outta order to sham, I bet he is cryin into his lakers shirt as we speak. "Aiii, I is gonna tell mi crew dat you is all pickin on me!!"
By the way I fink you is all well outta order to sham, I bet he is cryin into his lakers shirt as we speak. "Aiii, I is gonna tell mi crew dat you is all pickin on me!!"
if its a crash repaired s202 sell it as one, thats had a full repair, face lift fornt end, and then sell it at a reasonable price rather than trying to rip off people who trust you. simple and moral realy.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Scotland, UK
I have just had the pleasure / misfortune to read through this thread from start to finish. I find it rather amusing that this so called "car fanatic" (Sham S202) is so convinced that his previous car was an S202. I don't quite understand why this muppet thought for a second he could get away with bullsh*tting us.
And before you reply to this post "Sham S202" - which to me says a lot - please think for one second why we are posting in the first case and also use understandable English. This whole street talking slang rubbish just makes you sound like a total idiot - which you may or may not be..........I've not met you. But from the sounds of things..................
Now you have been quoted as saying a number of times now that you believe the car to a genuine S202. Fine...........you can believe what you want but for your own education that car was not ever, or will ever be an S202. Also you then make stupid comments like it could be a face-lifted version 7........but wait hold on a minute, that would mean that the car did have front end damage and that is was repaired, which contradicts your other statements.
And I like the maturity of someone that says and clearly believes that because a car has some S202 badges it really is one. This really does say a lot about you.....................
.
So now that I have got the issues with the inconsistencies of your posts out of the way. You "say" that the car had side impact damage............ok I'm inclined to believe you as by the sound of things (from some of your previous posts and a childs effort at a website) you drove the car like a moron at stupid speeds on public roads.
So far no one has commented on the rear of the car. I would just like to point out that "Sham S202" has never once indicated that the back of the car was anything other than standard (i.e. it never required accident damage repaired).
So could you please explain to us ALL why your OLD car below has the rear lights and bumper from a version 8 car. The small crescent shaped extensions to the rear lights and consequent cut out of the bumper were not present on the version 7 "bugeye" model. And if your car was a genuine S202 then is would have the straight cut rear lights even if the front had been updated to a version 8 "look-a-like". Also the whole shape of the rear bumper is totally different..........I have attached a picture of the rear end of a genuine S202 for comparison.
And whilst I am here............could you please also explain why the sideskirts don't match??
And finally for the benefit / education of "Sham S202" - it is NOT possible to have a genuine S202 in a "blobeye'd" MY04 version 8 bodyshell. They were only ever produced in the version 7 "BUGEYE" bodyshell.
I also take REAL offence that you think you could fool us and pass this lame attempt at an S202 off on us. If the whole point of this thread was a wind-up then congratulations you have won...........we will always highlight to other newer / less knowledgable members potential problems with scoobies. That is why we are here.
And if you were genuine...................... . Why can you not accept that you were fooled and lucky to pass it off to someone who knew less about the S202 special edition than you did??
Anyway that is my rant over..............and I think this is the longest reply I have ever posted and i am sad it was on this STUPIDITY.
Dave
And before you reply to this post "Sham S202" - which to me says a lot - please think for one second why we are posting in the first case and also use understandable English. This whole street talking slang rubbish just makes you sound like a total idiot - which you may or may not be..........I've not met you. But from the sounds of things..................
Now you have been quoted as saying a number of times now that you believe the car to a genuine S202. Fine...........you can believe what you want but for your own education that car was not ever, or will ever be an S202. Also you then make stupid comments like it could be a face-lifted version 7........but wait hold on a minute, that would mean that the car did have front end damage and that is was repaired, which contradicts your other statements.
And I like the maturity of someone that says and clearly believes that because a car has some S202 badges it really is one. This really does say a lot about you.....................
.So now that I have got the issues with the inconsistencies of your posts out of the way. You "say" that the car had side impact damage............ok I'm inclined to believe you as by the sound of things (from some of your previous posts and a childs effort at a website) you drove the car like a moron at stupid speeds on public roads.
So far no one has commented on the rear of the car. I would just like to point out that "Sham S202" has never once indicated that the back of the car was anything other than standard (i.e. it never required accident damage repaired).
So could you please explain to us ALL why your OLD car below has the rear lights and bumper from a version 8 car. The small crescent shaped extensions to the rear lights and consequent cut out of the bumper were not present on the version 7 "bugeye" model. And if your car was a genuine S202 then is would have the straight cut rear lights even if the front had been updated to a version 8 "look-a-like". Also the whole shape of the rear bumper is totally different..........I have attached a picture of the rear end of a genuine S202 for comparison.
And whilst I am here............could you please also explain why the sideskirts don't match??
And finally for the benefit / education of "Sham S202" - it is NOT possible to have a genuine S202 in a "blobeye'd" MY04 version 8 bodyshell. They were only ever produced in the version 7 "BUGEYE" bodyshell.
I also take REAL offence that you think you could fool us and pass this lame attempt at an S202 off on us. If the whole point of this thread was a wind-up then congratulations you have won...........we will always highlight to other newer / less knowledgable members potential problems with scoobies. That is why we are here.
And if you were genuine......................
. Why can you not accept that you were fooled and lucky to pass it off to someone who knew less about the S202 special edition than you did??Anyway that is my rant over..............and I think this is the longest reply I have ever posted and i am sad it was on this STUPIDITY.
Dave
Scooby Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Originally Posted by clutdav
I have just had the pleasure / misfortune to read through this thread from start to finish. I find it rather amusing that this so called "car fanatic" (Sham S202) is so convinced that his previous car was an S202. I don't quite understand why this muppet thought for a second he could get away with bullsh*tting us.
And before you reply to this post "Sham S202" - which to me says a lot - please think for one second why we are posting in the first case and also use understandable English. This whole street talking slang rubbish just makes you sound like a total idiot - which you may or may not be..........I've not met you. But from the sounds of things..................
Now you have been quoted as saying a number of times now that you believe the car to a genuine S202. Fine...........you can believe what you want but for your own education that car was not ever, or will ever be an S202. Also you then make stupid comments like it could be a face-lifted version 7........but wait hold on a minute, that would mean that the car did have front end damage and that is was repaired, which contradicts your other statements.
And I like the maturity of someone that says and clearly believes that because a car has some S202 badges it really is one. This really does say a lot about you..................... .
So now that I have got the issues with the inconsistencies of your posts out of the way. You "say" that the car had side impact damage............ok I'm inclined to believe you as by the sound of things (from some of your previous posts and a childs effort at a website) you drove the car like a moron at stupid speeds on public roads.
So far no one has commented on the rear of the car. I would just like to point out that "Sham S202" has never once indicated that the back of the car was anything other than standard (i.e. it never required accident damage repaired).
So could you please explain to us ALL why your OLD car below has the rear lights and bumper from a version 8 car. The small crescent shaped extensions to the rear lights and consequent cut out of the bumper were not present on the version 7 "bugeye" model. And if your car was a genuine S202 then is would have the straight cut rear lights even if the front had been updated to a version 8 "look-a-like". Also the whole shape of the rear bumper is totally different..........I have attached a picture of the rear end of a genuine S202 for comparison.
And whilst I am here............could you please also explain why the sideskirts don't match??
And finally for the benefit / education of "Sham S202" - it is NOT possible to have a genuine S202 in a "blobeye'd" MY04 version 8 bodyshell. They were only ever produced in the version 7 "BUGEYE" bodyshell.
I also take REAL offence that you think you could fool us and pass this lame attempt at an S202 off on us. If the whole point of this thread was a wind-up then congratulations you have won...........we will always highlight to other newer / less knowledgable members potential problems with scoobies. That is why we are here.
And if you were genuine...................... . Why can you not accept that you were fooled and lucky to pass it off to someone who knew less about the S202 special edition than you did??
Anyway that is my rant over..............and I think this is the longest reply I have ever posted and i am sad it was on this STUPIDITY.
Dave
And before you reply to this post "Sham S202" - which to me says a lot - please think for one second why we are posting in the first case and also use understandable English. This whole street talking slang rubbish just makes you sound like a total idiot - which you may or may not be..........I've not met you. But from the sounds of things..................
Now you have been quoted as saying a number of times now that you believe the car to a genuine S202. Fine...........you can believe what you want but for your own education that car was not ever, or will ever be an S202. Also you then make stupid comments like it could be a face-lifted version 7........but wait hold on a minute, that would mean that the car did have front end damage and that is was repaired, which contradicts your other statements.
And I like the maturity of someone that says and clearly believes that because a car has some S202 badges it really is one. This really does say a lot about you.....................
.So now that I have got the issues with the inconsistencies of your posts out of the way. You "say" that the car had side impact damage............ok I'm inclined to believe you as by the sound of things (from some of your previous posts and a childs effort at a website) you drove the car like a moron at stupid speeds on public roads.
So far no one has commented on the rear of the car. I would just like to point out that "Sham S202" has never once indicated that the back of the car was anything other than standard (i.e. it never required accident damage repaired).
So could you please explain to us ALL why your OLD car below has the rear lights and bumper from a version 8 car. The small crescent shaped extensions to the rear lights and consequent cut out of the bumper were not present on the version 7 "bugeye" model. And if your car was a genuine S202 then is would have the straight cut rear lights even if the front had been updated to a version 8 "look-a-like". Also the whole shape of the rear bumper is totally different..........I have attached a picture of the rear end of a genuine S202 for comparison.
And whilst I am here............could you please also explain why the sideskirts don't match??
And finally for the benefit / education of "Sham S202" - it is NOT possible to have a genuine S202 in a "blobeye'd" MY04 version 8 bodyshell. They were only ever produced in the version 7 "BUGEYE" bodyshell.
I also take REAL offence that you think you could fool us and pass this lame attempt at an S202 off on us. If the whole point of this thread was a wind-up then congratulations you have won...........we will always highlight to other newer / less knowledgable members potential problems with scoobies. That is why we are here.
And if you were genuine......................
. Why can you not accept that you were fooled and lucky to pass it off to someone who knew less about the S202 special edition than you did??Anyway that is my rant over..............and I think this is the longest reply I have ever posted and i am sad it was on this STUPIDITY.
Dave
Scooby Regular
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Scotland, UK
Originally Posted by Heple
You've gone and done it now!
Just when we all thought this thread had finally died a death.
Craig
Just when we all thought this thread had finally died a death.
Craig
Dave
Scooby Regular
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire : MY99 UK Turbo
Originally Posted by clutdav
5 other repies were posted today before I did...............
Dave
Dave
I hope thats cheered you up........
Craig
Innit 
Scooby Regular
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 0
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire
This guy "sham" isn't rowing with both oars in the water is he?!
I mean 8 pages on and he still hasn't got the idea that this is an Impreza enthusiasts forum, does he just presume that out of the 60 odd thousand members no one will know anything about them?!
If this is just a wind up then I hope "im an iz boyz" eventually get what comes to them in their cut-n-shut pieces of w@nk. Burning a hail of UK Garage 'music' and burberry smoke!
I mean 8 pages on and he still hasn't got the idea that this is an Impreza enthusiasts forum, does he just presume that out of the 60 odd thousand members no one will know anything about them?!
If this is just a wind up then I hope "im an iz boyz" eventually get what comes to them in their cut-n-shut pieces of w@nk. Burning a hail of UK Garage 'music' and burberry smoke!
Scooby Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Originally Posted by Bullitt_Rich
This guy "sham" isn't rowing with both oars in the water is he?!
I mean 8 pages on and he still hasn't got the idea that this is an Impreza enthusiasts forum, does he just presume that out of the 60 odd thousand members no one will know anything about them?!
If this is just a wind up then I hope "im an iz boyz" eventually get what comes to them in their cut-n-shut pieces of w@nk. Burning a hail of UK Garage 'music' and burberry smoke!
I mean 8 pages on and he still hasn't got the idea that this is an Impreza enthusiasts forum, does he just presume that out of the 60 odd thousand members no one will know anything about them?!
If this is just a wind up then I hope "im an iz boyz" eventually get what comes to them in their cut-n-shut pieces of w@nk. Burning a hail of UK Garage 'music' and burberry smoke!
some of the replies are hilarious
Scooby Regular
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: birmingham
boys im not defending sham by no means but my pal has a yellow s202 and he has had the blobeye front end put on you might of seen it around birmingham??? so this car on here might of had the same facelift???
but my pal has a yellow s202 and he has had the blobeye front end put on you might of seen it around birmingham??? so this car on here might of had the same facelift???
Last edited by stiginger; Dec 15, 2006 at 07:57 PM.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 0
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Originally Posted by stiginger
boys im not defending sham by no means but my pal has a yellow s202 and he has had the blobeye front end put on you might of seen it around birmingham??? so this car on here might of had the same facelift???]
but my pal has a yellow s202 and he has had the blobeye front end put on you might of seen it around birmingham??? so this car on here might of had the same facelift???]By the looks of the way this thread has gone, I would summise that basically this car is a WRX STI at the most, been crashed by some loon and more than likely written off. The Pikey's have seen it, got hold of it as scrap and thrown some new bits on it, probably from another Impreza they nicked which happened to be a S202 so they've stuck the badges on it too.
Now, this joker Sham comes along, gets his head filled (rather quickly) with alsorts of crap about it been rare etc etc and buys it. Thinks its the best thing since sliced bread then sells it to Keighley tw@t centre and then comes on here boast about what he had...ok.
Either that or he's seen pics of it on their website, hosted them himself and posted on here saying he once owned it.
This thread should die really. The real enthusiasts know its not real, he knows its not real but doesn't want to lose face.
Last edited by BULLITT; Dec 16, 2006 at 10:24 AM.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham
Originally Posted by stiginger
boys im not defending sham by no means but my pal has a yellow s202 and he has had the blobeye front end put on you might of seen it around birmingham??? so this car on here might of had the same facelift???
but my pal has a yellow s202 and he has had the blobeye front end put on you might of seen it around birmingham??? so this car on here might of had the same facelift???