Views on child maintainance
#61
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Around and about :p
Posts: 26,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Neverguess
Because children should never be used as pawns in issues the adults have. No matter what a ****e they are, as long as he/she is no danger to the child they should see him/her until they can make up their own mind.
If they are no shows all the time or it is detrimental to the child to see them then they can get to ****. But if they are just not paying money then it's not your choice to make.
Just my opinion
If they are no shows all the time or it is detrimental to the child to see them then they can get to ****. But if they are just not paying money then it's not your choice to make.
Just my opinion
I would also never want to use my children as a pawn, for anything.
They soon learn when they're growing up who does what for them and who gives a $hit about them. but those who just can't be bothered to spend time with their children because they have far more interesting things to do and don't pay, that's unforgivable IMO
#62
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Around and about :p
Posts: 26,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
My point is that both shouldn't be being expected to pay out
I think quite a lot of fathers would be happy with that option, don't pay, don't see the kid. The problem is there are plenty that do pay and aren't allowed to see the kids!
I think quite a lot of fathers would be happy with that option, don't pay, don't see the kid. The problem is there are plenty that do pay and aren't allowed to see the kids!
#63
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by davegtt
Everybody knows whats morally right and wrong as Neverguess has pointed out, it does work both ways though and it would happen on an even scale if the male got the children instead of the mother. I dont see the point to the discussion, your not going to get many people come on this thread being serious saying no I shouldnt pay anything are you?
Some people just dont want anything to do with their kids, once seperated for whatever their reasons are, to get at the mother, they never wanted kids etc etc etc, and some arent allowed to see their kids again for a variety of reasons, in most cases just the mother being awkward (in Julian's case and a few others that I know of)
However some of those people do still provide for their kids because the law states that they have to, some do it for that reason alone, some do it because they want to provide for their kids
A member of my family has never seen her father nor has he seen her, as he refused to have anything to do with her mother once she was pregnant, she is now 18, but he has always paid maintenance since she was born
#65
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
we're discussing the need to implement a system whereby the money paid goes to the children alone, and the wayward mother can **** right off out of it and support herself with her "new man who treats the kids like his own", they're not his own, never will be, so give it up.
#66
Originally Posted by Peanuts
we're discussing the need to implement a system whereby the money paid goes to the children alone, and the wayward mother can **** right off out of it and support herself with her "new man who treats the kids like his own", they're not his own, never will be, so give it up.
How can you give a 2 year old their own money and get them to buy stuff?? No system can have that happen.
It's a case of having decent parents in the first place. If an adult doesn't spend the money as they should then they should never have had kids in the first place.
#67
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Around and about :p
Posts: 26,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight, thanks for tha peanuts!
I was merely wondering what views fathers from seperated relationships did to support their child.
Doesn't matter if the mother has a new bloke on the scene or not, a lot of the fathers' have new wimmin too.
I would have expected more blokes to have stated that regardless, they want to and do see their children ans make sure they're well provided for, regardless of bad feeling between both parents
I was merely wondering what views fathers from seperated relationships did to support their child.
Doesn't matter if the mother has a new bloke on the scene or not, a lot of the fathers' have new wimmin too.
I would have expected more blokes to have stated that regardless, they want to and do see their children ans make sure they're well provided for, regardless of bad feeling between both parents
#70
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a lot of the fathers' have new wimmin too
Men should contribute to the upkeep of the child/ren, but unfortunately some mothers take the proverbial.
What does it really cost to feed a sprog for a month? And how often do children really need school uniforms?
#72
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Listen, I agree, I also think that "we men" should do the right thing at least till either 18yo or leaving FT education.
But, Can there be anything more degrading to a man than have another man look after HIS kid/s "as though they were his own" doing all the upbringing bit while the (so called) mother reaps the rewards of a failed relationship and her good fortune at "snaring" a gold mine with a large ****?
But, Can there be anything more degrading to a man than have another man look after HIS kid/s "as though they were his own" doing all the upbringing bit while the (so called) mother reaps the rewards of a failed relationship and her good fortune at "snaring" a gold mine with a large ****?
#73
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In my house
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My brother had a child with his girlfriend at the time he was 21 and she was 23, then soon after my niece was born they broke up and he wasnt allowed to see her she said he had to pay so much a week blah blah blah, so he did just to see his daughter as she's got older she's 2 in december she's demanded more money, said he must pick her up at 10am and he's supposed to have her till 4 she would ring him at 4 and say you have to have her till 6 im in the pub. she gets her new fellas to ring him up threatening him for no reason. i know my brother isnt a total angel in all this but she stops him from seeing her if he's 10 minutes late. she's just a manipulative bitch and she's asking for a slap. my brother loves my niece to bits, i love my niece to bits i havent seen her in months coz of this bitch im missing out on seeing her grow up, i just hope she knows who her aunty is when she's older. but men have as much rights as women to see their kids it takes 2 to tango.
#75
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Around and about :p
Posts: 26,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Peanuts
Listen, I agree, I also think that "we men" should do the right thing at least till either 18yo or leaving FT education.
But, Can there be anything more degrading to a man than have another man look after HIS kid/s "as though they were his own" doing all the upbringing bit while the (so called) mother reaps the rewards of a failed relationship and her good fortune at "snaring" a gold mine with a large ****?
But, Can there be anything more degrading to a man than have another man look after HIS kid/s "as though they were his own" doing all the upbringing bit while the (so called) mother reaps the rewards of a failed relationship and her good fortune at "snaring" a gold mine with a large ****?
Yes it can be degrading to have another man bring up their kids, yet it wouldn't happen if the father was there enough for the children and made sure they knew who their dad is. There's also the other side of it where the father has a new woman and she helps bring that child up when they stay with them, then the mother is in the same degrading boat
What about the blokes who seem to think if they don't make any effort to see their children that they don't have to pay?
#77
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Around and about :p
Posts: 26,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THere's plenty of mothers who don't have new partners because they don't get out as they spend all their time with the child and don't get out, yet the father who has no responsibility once he's on his own can go out whenever he pleases and see who he likes, because he can!
It's not as easy for a woman to get a new parter when she has kids either, as a lot of men won't look twice and scarper as soon as they find out about the kids
It's not as easy for a woman to get a new parter when she has kids either, as a lot of men won't look twice and scarper as soon as they find out about the kids
#78
Originally Posted by D.K.1
THere's plenty of mothers who don't have new partners because they don't get out as they spend all their time with the child and don't get out, yet the father who has no responsibility once he's on his own can go out whenever he pleases and see who he likes, because he can!
It's not as easy for a woman to get a new parter when she has kids either, as a lot of men won't look twice and scarper as soon as they find out about the kids
It's not as easy for a woman to get a new parter when she has kids either, as a lot of men won't look twice and scarper as soon as they find out about the kids
#82
Originally Posted by D.K.1
with what money when they barely make enough money to bring the kids up, let alone afford a PC
In that case,the b@rstard can be blagged by law to buy mother a PC!
#84
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 17,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At the end of the day the CSA is only interested in securing it's future - and so victimises all and sundry - to hit its targets and provide positive stories to the media on how well it's doing! (One of the UK's biggest failures as a Quango).
Payment and access are not mutually linked - but can be influenced by the parents / the courts. I agree with NG on this one - always to the detriment of the kids.
I've got a mate with 3 kids - all by different women. Luckily he's extremely wealthy and pays them all decent maintainance - but the kids will suffer as he has zero interest in any of them - he just wanted the mothers (sans child).
Payment and access are not mutually linked - but can be influenced by the parents / the courts. I agree with NG on this one - always to the detriment of the kids.
I've got a mate with 3 kids - all by different women. Luckily he's extremely wealthy and pays them all decent maintainance - but the kids will suffer as he has zero interest in any of them - he just wanted the mothers (sans child).
#85
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by D.K.1
How baout the blokes who disown their kids at the first sign of a failed relationship?
Originally Posted by D.K.1
What about the blokes who seem to think if they don't make any effort to see their children that they don't have to pay?
#86
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by davegtt
What about them? what do you want us to say, theyre very bad people, whats the discussion/debate all about
#87
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Neverguess
How can you give a 2 year old their own money and get them to buy stuff?? No system can have that happen.
It's a case of having decent parents in the first place. If an adult doesn't spend the money as they should then they should never have had kids in the first place.
It's a case of having decent parents in the first place. If an adult doesn't spend the money as they should then they should never have had kids in the first place.
#88
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, she wants peoples views on paying child maintenance, and we've already covered the fact that she'll be a lucky girl to find anyone who seriously disagrees with her own view, like I said we all know whats morally right and whats wrong, anyone who says otherwise is probably a person not worth knowing
#89
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Peanuts
...while the (so called) mother reaps the rewards of a failed relationship and her good fortune at "snaring" a gold mine with a large ****?
btw I am poor
so what your saying is all women in failed relationships go for large ****?
#90
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to put a bit of a twist on the thread.
My workmate split up with his wife many years ago, they both have very good jobs. He's head of IT at our place and she is an accountant.
My mate got custody of his two children and receives child support from his wife.
His second marriage also failed after a few months, new wife was 15years younger and ran off with someone her own age (19). She is the daughter of very rich parents. As a wedding gift her parents paid half towards their new home. My workmate got everything and didn't pay a penny back as his ex-inlaws said he had suffered enough at the hands of their daughter.
He has now moved in with his third partner whose husband has died and left her everything as well as a decent widows pension, she also works and has a good job.
Is he the luckiest man alive?
Cheers
Lee
My workmate split up with his wife many years ago, they both have very good jobs. He's head of IT at our place and she is an accountant.
My mate got custody of his two children and receives child support from his wife.
His second marriage also failed after a few months, new wife was 15years younger and ran off with someone her own age (19). She is the daughter of very rich parents. As a wedding gift her parents paid half towards their new home. My workmate got everything and didn't pay a penny back as his ex-inlaws said he had suffered enough at the hands of their daughter.
He has now moved in with his third partner whose husband has died and left her everything as well as a decent widows pension, she also works and has a good job.
Is he the luckiest man alive?
Cheers
Lee