Do you want proper techy discussion and no bull****?
#91
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
OK, its just that its difficult to measure pressure in a fast flowing stream due to the low pressure (suction) created when a high speed gas or fluid passes over a surface/tube end etc
Andy
Andy
#94
If you measure flow in the scoop and flow in the gearbox areas or elsewhere then that indicates 'pressure differentials'?
The TMIC 'trousers' (such a good way to describe the item!) crossed my mind when looking to put high speed fans on the TOP of the TMIC, continuously running in a hill climb, water spray up-stream of them so the fans speed up the water flow and maybe 'atomises' the dropplets too (?)
A thought was to mount the fans in each (or the one) trouser leg, and draw the TMIC air by the fan down to the lower front wishbone area under the starter motor side.
This is however very restrictive if you look down there and try to sight a clear 'tube' passing down... The turbo side is silly..far to blocked up with the hot D/P!
When you consider all the thread's (good) points of view which have been bullsh!t free (I hope I qualify) a simple FMIC with a clear inlet/grill opening, 'sealed' to the water rad so the twin rad fans are effective for drawing cool air through at slow speeds and chilling the FMIC core/end tanks, coupled with a wide open lower engine bay would fix it all! ( cracking open the rear edge of the bonnet or removing the bonnet seal front and back also)
Now then...isn't that what the Lateral Performance FMIC is?
Shall I get my coat immediatly and leave?
Graham
The TMIC 'trousers' (such a good way to describe the item!) crossed my mind when looking to put high speed fans on the TOP of the TMIC, continuously running in a hill climb, water spray up-stream of them so the fans speed up the water flow and maybe 'atomises' the dropplets too (?)
A thought was to mount the fans in each (or the one) trouser leg, and draw the TMIC air by the fan down to the lower front wishbone area under the starter motor side.
This is however very restrictive if you look down there and try to sight a clear 'tube' passing down... The turbo side is silly..far to blocked up with the hot D/P!
When you consider all the thread's (good) points of view which have been bullsh!t free (I hope I qualify) a simple FMIC with a clear inlet/grill opening, 'sealed' to the water rad so the twin rad fans are effective for drawing cool air through at slow speeds and chilling the FMIC core/end tanks, coupled with a wide open lower engine bay would fix it all! ( cracking open the rear edge of the bonnet or removing the bonnet seal front and back also)
Now then...isn't that what the Lateral Performance FMIC is?
Shall I get my coat immediatly and leave?
Graham
Last edited by 911; 30 March 2006 at 06:40 AM.
#95
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Door is to your left
The problem with estimating mass flow based on DP in 2 different CSA's is that you can't ! Not without knowing the velocity.
Air or fluid will flow from low to high pressure as well as from high to low. Think of how a carburetor works.
Andy
The problem with estimating mass flow based on DP in 2 different CSA's is that you can't ! Not without knowing the velocity.
Air or fluid will flow from low to high pressure as well as from high to low. Think of how a carburetor works.
Andy
#96
Can't read this thread from out here!
What i'm trying to say is if the flow grows or diminishes with speed it indicates the changes happening in different/chosen zones around the car.
Still think a FMIC vented well will simply work from any reasonable speed, and better than a TMIC with a stationary car because of limited heat soak from the surroundings and exposure of the FMIC core to cold air rather than hot constantly rising engine bay air.
Catching the bus now....
Graham
What i'm trying to say is if the flow grows or diminishes with speed it indicates the changes happening in different/chosen zones around the car.
Still think a FMIC vented well will simply work from any reasonable speed, and better than a TMIC with a stationary car because of limited heat soak from the surroundings and exposure of the FMIC core to cold air rather than hot constantly rising engine bay air.
Catching the bus now....
Graham
#97
Originally Posted by Andy.F
The problem with estimating mass flow based on DP in 2 different CSA's is that you can't ! Not without knowing the velocity.
Andy
Andy
In this case as the intercooler is finned and both sides are under pressure natural flow must be from high to low. After all you wouldn't expect air to flow INto a leaking boost hose at full boost
only way you can get from low to high is through a venturi or mechanically force it.
#99
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what about measuring the flow at the scoop with the bonnet vent blanking plates removed. What effect does this have on the general flow under the bonnet etc and would it help with the temperatures?
#100
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by RB5_245
Actually you could if you also measured temperature and plotted on a pv graph, but i very much doubt it would be accurate enough to be of any use
In this case as the intercooler is finned and both sides are under pressure natural flow must be from high to low. After all you wouldn't expect air to flow INto a leaking boost hose at full boost
only way you can get from low to high is through a venturi or mechanically force it.
In this case as the intercooler is finned and both sides are under pressure natural flow must be from high to low. After all you wouldn't expect air to flow INto a leaking boost hose at full boost
only way you can get from low to high is through a venturi or mechanically force it.
#101
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by jaytc2003
what about measuring the flow at the scoop with the bonnet vent blanking plates removed. What effect does this have on the general flow under the bonnet etc and would it help with the temperatures?
I like the idea of the 'trousers' with a fan in each leg. Clunky and probably impossible to rig up practically, but a cool idea nevertheless.
#102
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by silent running
I can't see how pressure can ever flow from low to high. So in the 'no bull****' spirit of this thread, someone please explain this to me.
The entry area to the tmic could work like a venturi as the area increases after the entry point, in turn slowing down the airflow and increasing its pressure.
I'm not suggesting the airflow is reversing out the scoop or even that I have any idea what is actually happening to the flow at this point. I'm just saying that pressure measurement in this area is highly likely to be misleading.
Andy
#103
I wasn't actually going to post this but since you ask
Imo the scoop entry to intercooler surface acts as a volute, ie converting pressure into flow. As the scoop can be seen as a sealed volume from the high pressure high velocity small csa scoop the flow reduces in pressure and increases in volume in the same way as a cenrifugal pump does. I don't think it can be described as a venturi as it doesn't create an area of pressure lower than it's outlet pressure, with the exeption of a pocket of air on the sharp side of the bend (which should be reduced as much as poss with a splitter).
By reducing the volume of a tube and hence the pressure of the flow, allowing a inlet feed then expanding the tube you can create a very good vacuum in the line which is obviously at much lower pressure than the outlet of the venturi. Hence you are flowing from low to high pressure in a cheating sort of way. I'm not the best at descriptions but have a look at this link
It should help.
but I think this is going to far into theories rather than that which is practically measurable to us.
Dave
Imo the scoop entry to intercooler surface acts as a volute, ie converting pressure into flow. As the scoop can be seen as a sealed volume from the high pressure high velocity small csa scoop the flow reduces in pressure and increases in volume in the same way as a cenrifugal pump does. I don't think it can be described as a venturi as it doesn't create an area of pressure lower than it's outlet pressure, with the exeption of a pocket of air on the sharp side of the bend (which should be reduced as much as poss with a splitter).
By reducing the volume of a tube and hence the pressure of the flow, allowing a inlet feed then expanding the tube you can create a very good vacuum in the line which is obviously at much lower pressure than the outlet of the venturi. Hence you are flowing from low to high pressure in a cheating sort of way. I'm not the best at descriptions but have a look at this link
It should help.
but I think this is going to far into theories rather than that which is practically measurable to us.
Dave
#104
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Andy - yes that's pretty much what I thought of as a venturi effect - an area of low pressure created by a zone of fast moving or expanding air. But surely in that example of the straw, it's not doing anything that surprising - the blow across the top of the straw is simply creating a low pressure area which the liquid rises towards because at the opposite end it's pushed by the relatively higher atmospheric pressure.
So I can see how there's a possibility that the scoop MIGHT have a venturi effect going on, but I can't see how it could possibly be significant enough to make any difference to flow in that area.
I think I can follow what you're saying Dave, and it seems to make sense.
So I can see how there's a possibility that the scoop MIGHT have a venturi effect going on, but I can't see how it could possibly be significant enough to make any difference to flow in that area.
I think I can follow what you're saying Dave, and it seems to make sense.
#105
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Ok, I realise I'm kind of taking things off topic based on theory here regards the validity of dp measurement.
If anyone has use of a basic data logger or even a multimeter, I have a used maf I could give them. It could be cable tied in position, powered up from a lead to the battery and the output (proportional to mass flow) at various speed monitored.
A definative measure of actual airflow through the intercooler.
Andy
If anyone has use of a basic data logger or even a multimeter, I have a used maf I could give them. It could be cable tied in position, powered up from a lead to the battery and the output (proportional to mass flow) at various speed monitored.
A definative measure of actual airflow through the intercooler.
Andy
#106
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The exit of the scoop, is about double the area of the entry. Argument over, Bernoulli wins, pressure will increase as you go inside the scoop, pressure is decreased over the surface of the bonnet due to increased velocity.
#107
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yea, we know that Paul, thats why I was saying beware of measuring pressure differential and be carefull where you measure it.
It would be easy to measure the low pressure in front of the scoop, high pressure inside the scoop and conclude (incorrectly) that there was no flow into it !
It would be easy to measure the low pressure in front of the scoop, high pressure inside the scoop and conclude (incorrectly) that there was no flow into it !
#108
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy.F
Yea, we know that Paul, thats why I was saying beware of measuring pressure differential and be carefull where you measure it.
It would be easy to measure the low pressure in front of the scoop, high pressure inside the scoop and conclude (incorrectly) that there was no flow into it !
It would be easy to measure the low pressure in front of the scoop, high pressure inside the scoop and conclude (incorrectly) that there was no flow into it !
Measureing the pressure say at the surface of the fins at the top and bottom would be a more valid way of doing it, as the CSA is effectively the same. I like the idea of a maf sensor, but it doesn't give an idea of direction of flow, although if it reversed you would see it pass through zero.
#109
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
OK so to rule out the problems of any other effects, I'll just measure differential pressure directly above and below the I/C. I'll do it today if I get the chance.
#110
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by silent running
OK so to rule out the problems of any other effects, I'll just measure differential pressure directly above and below the I/C. I'll do it today if I get the chance.
Any news?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post