KL activity video, is it due to gearchange..???
16 October 2006, 10:03 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
deleted putfile link as it's ****e..!
(see YouTube link below)..
Update: Here's some new footage since last round of mods (VF35/Pinks/Walbro/Remap)..
Good to compare.
(see YouTube link below)..Update: Here's some new footage since last round of mods (VF35/Pinks/Walbro/Remap)..
Good to compare.
Last edited by jasonius; 16 October 2006 at 10:56 PM.
28 November 2006, 09:15 PM
#35
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheers guys.
IMHO any quicker on the road is pointless, especially if it's at the expense of response/spool..
Had a good 'test' the other day with a newish Carrera S. It just helped to prove what I already knew..
j
IMHO any quicker on the road is pointless, especially if it's at the expense of response/spool..
Had a good 'test' the other day with a newish Carrera S. It just helped to prove what I already knew..
j
28 November 2006, 11:44 PM
#36
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice to see you're still enjoying the mods Jason!
That uprated tubo and associated mods certainly does the trick does't it?
That uprated tubo and associated mods certainly does the trick does't it?
29 November 2006, 07:12 PM
#38
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Worcester
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jasonius
Cheers guys.
IMHO any quicker on the road is pointless, especially if it's at the expense of response/spool..
j
IMHO any quicker on the road is pointless, especially if it's at the expense of response/spool..
j
29 November 2006, 07:14 PM
#39
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WRX_Rich
i take it you havn't been in a fast one yet
BTW what's a typical 60-100 time for a 'fast one'..?
29 November 2006, 07:21 PM
#41
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Worcester
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not sure for some reason mates won't sit in the car with a stop clock any more
in all honesty you are correct any bigger than a vf35 does get a bit hairy but fun all the same
in all honesty you are correct any bigger than a vf35 does get a bit hairy but fun all the same
29 November 2006, 08:03 PM
#42
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Thats pretty quick it would give my Spec C a run for its money
Tony
it would give my Spec C a run for its money Tony
Actually, weight (c 1350kg) and output (330+x330) is about the same, although your TS should be better below 2k..?
29 November 2006, 09:04 PM
#43
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jasonius
Now that's a nice compliment..
Actually, weight (c 1350kg) and output (330+x330) is about the same, although your TS should be better below 2k..?
Actually, weight (c 1350kg) and output (330+x330) is about the same, although your TS should be better below 2k..?
262.45 bhp ton for a classic with 319bhp........
Now who has one of those I wonder!!
I'm just pulling your leg
: very little in it I'd imagine and we're not taking into account important factors such as gearing etc...Ns04
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post