Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

Anyone use RAID 0 at home ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #31  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Default



Thought you would have.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 03:16 PM
  #32  
DrEvil's Avatar
DrEvil
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, UK
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Fuchsrohre
DrEvil, so do you run your web browser and email on the separate "Games/Apps" drive ?
In short no, but I don't use outlook and IE really isn't that IO intensive

I have two PCs, one for Apps/web/email and one for gaming.

Apps PC:
1x O/S (SATA)
1x Apps / Games / data (SATA)

Gaming PC:
1x O/S (SATA - my OS Raptor blew up recently)
1x Games (Raptor)
1x Data (SATA)

The Apps PC could do with a third drive for data (and a fourth to mirror it).
My gaming PC's drives remain unmirrored because I had some negative results with h/w RAID1 performance wise - could have been the h/w RAID1 implementation on the A8V though - haven't tried on the A8N.

TBH with the Apps I use, putting them on a separate drive isn't that worth while, but for the games I play I've seen a big improvement in level load times - part of this is the 10Krpm Raptor at work though. But before the raptor I had two 'normal' SATA drives and splitting the OS and Game worked a treat for as a performance boost on load times.

There are others on these forums better placed to discuss the merits (or lack there -) of applications on a second drive - as I said, I've not found any real performance benefit for the tasks I do on the PC.

Having a data drive is great though, as you don't loose it all when you reinstall Windows, I guess the other option there is a partition though.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #33  
Iain Young's Avatar
Iain Young
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
From: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Default

The only advantage to having apps on seperate drive that I've seen is if you are using the swap file a lot whilst at the same time the app is trying to read data from (or write to) the disc.

With a large chunk of memory in the pc (i.e. 2gb or more - depending on what you are doing) then I've not personally seen any advantage to putting apps on seperate drive..
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 07:51 PM
  #34  
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,173
Likes: 0
From: Under your bonnet
Default

Originally Posted by Fuchsrohre
Now there's a man with style. I like it, although it sounds a little power hungry

May I ask which RAID controller you use ? I'd like something that doesn't hog the CPU
It's a hardware controller, straight off the motherboard...





Andy
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 09:40 PM
  #35  
swaussie's Avatar
swaussie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Default

Personally I wouldnt go near a raid 0 setup ever again. Too much of a PITA when a disk dies.

Most disks these days do have amazing numbers quoted as their MTBF's but that is only an estimate and hard drives DO fail whether its 4 hours or 40,000, you wont know until your in a whole world of hurt... so backup anything of importance if you go this route.

FWIW, I purchased myself a raptor 74gb and use it for my XP install and all my programs (office, games, virus scanners, etc) and it is still blazingly fast.

Last edited by swaussie; Jan 4, 2006 at 09:45 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XRS
Computer & Technology Related
18
Oct 16, 2015 01:38 PM
BLU
Computer & Technology Related
11
Oct 2, 2015 12:53 PM
Pro-Line Motorsport
ScoobyNet General
9
Sep 28, 2015 09:48 PM
Littleted
Computer & Technology Related
0
Sep 25, 2015 08:44 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:24 AM.