Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

BOXSTER 3.2 S (latest shape)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26 December 2005, 06:32 PM
  #31  
Gastro
Scooby Regular
 
Gastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

www.stuttgart9.co.uk

PM for you Deep.......
Old 26 December 2005, 08:48 PM
  #32  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by Gastro
www.stuttgart9.co.uk

PM for you Deep.......
You have PM back
Old 26 December 2005, 08:50 PM
  #33  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by Turbohot
PMSL

Whole thread is a good read.

Merry Xmas to you all.



Merry Xmas to you!
Old 26 December 2005, 10:37 PM
  #34  
Gastro
Scooby Regular
 
Gastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Back to you Deep
Old 29 December 2005, 01:47 PM
  #35  
Old_Fart
Scooby Regular
 
Old_Fart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a 987 Boxster S, brilliant car, sold it because I was able to get a 997 Carrera S cabrio so thought 'Why not?' well to be honest I preferred the Boxster. It was a more involving drive, steering and brakes were more responsive and it sounded much better..the 997's extra power was lovely though, loadsa torque.
So a terrible year for me...
996 C4S was too uncomfortable, but was a nicer drive than the 997 IMHO
987 S was great but I don't really have room in my life for a 2 seater.
997 S has too many buttons on the centre console, and steering not as 'feelsome' as 996...
Basically 911's aren't the worlds best car (for me) so I'm still hunting...
Cman
Old 29 December 2005, 05:54 PM
  #36  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hello Cman! Where have you been then? Glad to see I'm not the only one who finds the 996 uncomfortable! Must be age mate.

Deep
Old 30 December 2005, 09:35 AM
  #37  
Old_Fart
Scooby Regular
 
Old_Fart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Howdy Deep! Just been working hard, no time for internet BS!
Being 6'2 and with long legs I just couldn't get my legs under the damn steering wheel on the 996..when I drove it I was always spread legged and on long trips my left ankle suffered from it's positioning.
I know now that the seats can be lowered a little, so I may yet own another 996.
C
Old 30 December 2005, 12:15 PM
  #38  
Gastro
Scooby Regular
 
Gastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Curious comments...... Personally find the 996 more comfortable than the Boxster
Sitting position in the Boxster is nice for sure, but its certainly more cramped than a 996 (more legroom in the latter).

Anyway - if you find a 996 too uncomfortable thats bl**dy hard luck - IMHO your missing driving a great car
Old 30 December 2005, 02:27 PM
  #39  
Old_Fart
Scooby Regular
 
Old_Fart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure if you are referring to my comments, mine are made after owning a 996, 987 and 997. The simple fact that the 987/997 steering column is adjustable for rake and reach makes it far easier to get comfortable than the reach only 996, the effective cabin space in the 987 was greater than the 996. Apart from that I agree, 996 is a great drive (for short-***** ) .
C
Old 01 January 2006, 06:12 PM
  #41  
Castrol
Scooby Regular
 
Castrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North East of England
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Went to buy one in the Spring, convinced all we had to do was turn up, test drive it, love it and pay for it.

Too slow, too small, too expensive for what it offered - and yes, we knew the list price before visiting the dealer... Bought a new STi UK PPP and spent part of the Summer in Germany scaring Boxster drivers... Fun!
Old 01 January 2006, 06:30 PM
  #42  
Gastro
Scooby Regular
 
Gastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Old_Fart
Not sure if you are referring to my comments, mine are made after owning a 996, 987 and 997.
C
Mmmm - my comments were based on owning 986's and 996's.... Weird !
Old 01 January 2006, 06:31 PM
  #43  
Gastro
Scooby Regular
 
Gastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Castrol
Went to buy one in the Spring, convinced all we had to do was turn up, test drive it, love it and pay for it.

Too slow, too small, too expensive for what it offered - and yes, we knew the list price before visiting the dealer... Bought a new STi UK PPP and spent part of the Summer in Germany scaring Boxster drivers... Fun!
Yawn
Old 01 January 2006, 06:37 PM
  #44  
Castrol
Scooby Regular
 
Castrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North East of England
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yawn
Hey, no need to take offence. I've been hoping to buy a Porsche since I saw the 911 in 1964. Still want one, but the Boxster just didn't do it for me.
Old 02 January 2006, 01:12 AM
  #45  
Gastro
Scooby Regular
 
Gastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Castrol
Hey, no need to take offence. I've been hoping to buy a Porsche since I saw the 911 in 1964. Still want one, but the Boxster just didn't do it for me.
No offence taken.
Unfortunately this BBS like a million others has a soul based around debating one-sided car comparisons (eg vs.M3 or vs. 911 etc etc)........... and ultimately it degenerates with some crass comment(s) about a Porsche, a BMW or whatever. Having been on this BBS for 5 yrs or more......... I find it tiresome - thats all.

Porsche, BMW, Subaru, Mitsubishi etc - they are all interpretation's on what a performance car is/should be. I enjoyed my P1.......... I just grew up and for the last 4 years haven't been able to better a Porker as an overall package.

Horses for courses - you might be able to beat a Porker in a straight drag or maybe on a rally course, but YOU like many others ultimately still desire the former ??

Odd isn't it - perhaps there is more to a car than a 0-60 time and perhaps now you understand why I YAWN at comments like this....

"Too slow, too small, too expensive for what it offered - and yes, we knew the list price before visiting the dealer... Bought a new STi UK PPP and spent part of the Summer in Germany scaring Boxster drivers... Fun!"

Last edited by Gastro; 02 January 2006 at 01:15 AM.
Old 02 January 2006, 08:28 AM
  #46  
The Chief
Scooby Regular
 
The Chief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: There is only one God - Elvis!
Posts: 8,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you want something comfortable get a big Merc or similar, i drove a Boxster all the way from the north trip of Skye to Manchester in one hit, i'm quite a big bloke but i did not find it that uncomfortable.

i cant compare to a 996 though 'cos i aint driven one.

Lovely cars though
Old 02 January 2006, 09:49 AM
  #47  
Castrol
Scooby Regular
 
Castrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North East of England
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gastro

It was so small I couldn't get in or out easily. It was a non starter really. And I was disappointed with the performance. Loved the handling, roadholding, brakes, build quality etc, but as an overall package it wasn't right for us.

In the end, my Wife and I realised we really wanted a 911, but couldn't find one we fancied for Boxster S money. The STi was a better option and being our 7th new Impreza Turbo/WRX, was a known quantity. We also bought an ex dem Saab 95 Estate with (210bhp) Hirsch tuning pack, so we probably aren't ready for only 2 seats just yet.

Cheers
Old 07 January 2006, 02:19 PM
  #48  
porkerboy
Scooby Regular
 
porkerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Get yourself a 993TT - I cant fault it.

the car is now 10 years old, and I am going to change soon. I want a car with a warranty as if anything goes on my 993TT it will cost a fortune.

I have seen several 996 C4S for arounf £45K upwards - they seem very tempting. Or even a mark 2 GT3 for £50k.

Or should I go for a 996TT. Any advice chaps?
Old 07 January 2006, 02:23 PM
  #49  
Gastro
Scooby Regular
 
Gastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porkerboy
Get yourself a 993TT - I cant fault it.

the car is now 10 years old, and I am going to change soon. I want a car with a warranty as if anything goes on my 993TT it will cost a fortune.

I have seen several 996 C4S for arounf £45K upwards - they seem very tempting. Or even a mark 2 GT3 for £50k.

Or should I go for a 996TT. Any advice chaps?
I think if your currently driving a 993 TT then a C4S will be a big disappointment. Looks are great and handling is sublime - but you'll notice the gap in performance between what your driving and a C4S.

GT3's are lovely and fast - but if you are living with one as a daily car then I'd avoid it... remember hard suspension and no traction control can make winter months interesting.

The 996 TT seems an obvious choice...... prices are only modestly more than a C4S and it'll have 4wd, traction control and is a sensible daily car as well as 450bhp.

Out of interest, whats the spec on the 993 TT you have - PM me if you like.

Cheers,

Gastro
Old 07 January 2006, 05:51 PM
  #50  
porkerboy
Scooby Regular
 
porkerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for comments gastro.

The 993TT is a '95 car,polar silver, 73K miles. FPMDSH, MINT condition. Standard apart from techart silencers and back box (£2k!), sounds awesome.

Had a look a the cayman S today - disappointed. Drives very well, but for £50K - just doesnt feel or look special enough. A used 996 either C4S,TT or GT3 seems far more car for the money
Old 07 January 2006, 08:21 PM
  #51  
GCollier
Scooby Regular
 
GCollier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have to say if it's just a worry about warranty I'd hang onto the 993TT, particularly as you know the car, it has FMDSH and say it's mint. Any dealer is going to want at least £5-10k out of any deal you make, which pays for a lot of repairs.

Plus, even though I prefer the 996 as a daily driver, the 993TT is a real classic and just looks and feels special in a way that little in the 996 range this side of a GT3-RS does.

Gary.
Old 08 January 2006, 10:27 PM
  #52  
porkerboy
Scooby Regular
 
porkerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you sure a GT3 has no traction control? I thought that was the GT2.

Agree about dealers wanting to make £5-10k out of a deal - one reason why I certianly wouldnt go to a official porker centre - an independent will not be as greedy.
Old 09 January 2006, 12:27 AM
  #53  
Gastro
Scooby Regular
 
Gastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porkerboy
Are you sure a GT3 has no traction control? I thought that was the GT2.

Agree about dealers wanting to make £5-10k out of a deal - one reason why I certianly wouldnt go to a official porker centre - an independent will not be as greedy.
GT3 and GT2 - no traction control (promise), but both have LSD.
Its the one thing that would stop me having either as a daily drive.
Old 09 January 2006, 12:28 AM
  #54  
Gastro
Scooby Regular
 
Gastro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porkerboy
Thanks for comments gastro.

The 993TT is a '95 car,polar silver, 73K miles. FPMDSH, MINT condition. Standard apart from techart silencers and back box (£2k!), sounds awesome.

Had a look a the cayman S today - disappointed. Drives very well, but for £50K - just doesnt feel or look special enough. A used 996 either C4S,TT or GT3 seems far more car for the money
Nice colour - same as my C4S
Shame the 7 and the 3 aren't the other way round - I might have been interested BTW - its not your car thats up for sale with Northway is it ?
Old 11 January 2006, 11:07 PM
  #55  
porkerboy
Scooby Regular
 
porkerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gastro
Nice colour - same as my C4S
Shame the 7 and the 3 aren't the other way round - I might have been interested BTW - its not your car thats up for sale with Northway is it ?
No, not mine
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
20 October 2015 04:32 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Flat4x4-again
General Technical
2
29 September 2015 06:32 PM
Benrowe727
ScoobyNet General
7
28 September 2015 07:05 AM
WRXrowdy
Computer & Technology Related
6
15 September 2015 08:56 PM



Quick Reply: BOXSTER 3.2 S (latest shape)



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 PM.