Dont you mean owes money. £££ millions in debt i recall

 

Could be

 

Technically no, IIRC Galzier took alot of debt on in his name using Man Utd as an asset to get the loan, so the loan doesnt effect Man Utd but if Glazier doesnt fancy paying his debts back utd could go down the pan, but in all honest Glaziers always going to be paying it back if utd are making healthy profits and if he doesnt think theyre earning enough he can always sell utd off....

 

You're totally wrong.....

 

lol.. probably am, I did think though that the debts in Glaziers name but used Utd as an asset???

Either way Im just happy utd are on that slippy decline. Id hope for them to be the next Leeds but I cant see it happening, more like the next Newcastle, big club going knowhere

 

Once he had the required number of shares he was able to transfer his personal debt he took on to buy the shares to the club therefore the debt is now the football clubs. One of the main reasons the fans are so against him.

 

Fair enough... Still dont see the problem though. Utd are making plently of money, probably lots more now theyve got Park. Glaziers still putting money in the kitty for transfers, the good thing though is he doesnt have the utd heart so will probably be the first to lose patience with old red nose

 

What I don't understand is why the 'i' has suddenly appeared in Glazer Is it down to the fact that most ManUre fans are ignorant, illiterate retards, or what?

 

The only people who mentioned the name Glazer (happy now) in this thread aint even Utd fans so I dont see your point????

 

the problem is he wants that money for himself and not to improve the club. He also has to pay for the money borrowed so the interest is eating up the profits. money for players? yet to be seen. I doubt it is there truth be told.

 

lol thats wierd, it says STI was the last poster in this thread at 14:01, but I cant see his message... ??

 

Man U fans are always mentioning Abramovich