Fox Hunting - Whats the ratio? Vote NOW!

Subscribe
View Poll Results: Do you SUPPORT the BAN on FOXHUNTING?
YES - It SHOULD Be Banned
117
52.70%
NO - It Should NOT Be Banned
105
47.30%
Voters: 222. You may not vote on this poll
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:01 PM
  #61  
Quote: exactly what planet do you come from pete?
You will learn when you grow up how clever I have actually been in my observations

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:02 PM
  #62  
really pete ?

and there's me thinking youre just spouting cr@p

ps when i grow up can i have class too
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:04 PM
  #63  
Quote: really pete ?

and there's me thinking youre just spouting cr@p

ps when i grow up can i have class too
You will NEVER have class ...... its something you have all your life (you are nowhere near, even as a kiddie)

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:09 PM
  #64  
but according to your workings out I have class?

well over 35,000 per year

4 cars

800,000 + house?

or was that just more plewis talk then
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:11 PM
  #65  
Quote: but according to your workings out I have class?

well over 35,000 per year

4 cars

800,000 + house?

or was that just more plewis talk then
Just by claiming those things shows you as what you are:-

14 year old, yes?

School tomorrow, yes?

Look up to a king like pslewis, yes?

I think so - its ok, I'm sure you will grow out of it soon!! (when you get your first **** you will stop idolising me) - good luck!!

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:13 PM
  #66  
Quote: Just by claiming those things shows you as what you are:-

14 year old, yes?

School tomorrow, yes?

Look up to a king like pslewis, yes?

I think so - its ok, I'm sure you will grow out of it soon!! (when you get your first **** you will stop idolising me) - good luck!!

Pete
seriously pete where do you get these delusions? from you go from being (fairly) normal to plain scary at times!



Paul

ps oh and you're wrong on all accounts
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:16 PM
  #67  
Quote: ps oh and you're wrong on all accounts
Thats JUST what a 14 year old would say, bless!!

Get to bed, teacher will be mad if you are late!!

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #68  
Quote: would have voted no. but as not one pro hunts person has had the ********* to admit they do it because they enjoy it and prefer to hide behind a load of bollocks i voted yes.
Re-read my posts. In fact read them for the first time as its clear you havn't done so.

I have repeatedly cited enjoyment as one of the reasons to hunt and not only that but I have also had a good stab at explaining to those who have never hunted the nature of that enjoyment. As for having the guts to say it, none required, as there is nothing to be ashamed of.
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #69  
Quote: but according to your workings out I have class?

well over 35,000 per year

4 cars

800,000 + house?

or was that just more plewis talk then
does this make up for an exceptionally small *****?
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #70  
really i don't understand you at times when ive read some of your posts you have flashes of brilliance and foresight .................. the you spoil it by talking compete gibberish.

What gives you the idea I'm 14 yrs old do you have a fixation with boys?

not many 14yr's drive the car I have, your logic and reasoning is at best un-hinged

Paul
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:20 PM
  #71  
Quote: does this make up for an exceptionally small *****?
I would guess so, he is only 14 - leave him alone!

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #72  
Quote: does this make up for an exceptionally small *****?
no just trying to fathom the enigma names pslewis

and what does the size of my ***** have to do with anything??

are you embarrased im considerably richer than yaw
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #73  
Quote: not many 14yr's drive the car I have just bought on my PS2 game, Gran Turismo
Paul
Hmmmmmm, just what I thought, ahhhhhhhhhh,

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #74  
Clearly Pete's mother never brought him up to realise how vulgar it is to continually compare one's financial means with other people. Tacky, very tacky. Definately a lower class upbringing if ever I've seen one!
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #75  
Quote: I would guess so, he is only 14 - leave him alone!

Pete
why 14 pete?

is that when you stopped suckling then?
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #76  
Quote: why 14 pete?

is that when you stopped suckling then?
HA HA HA HA HA - the teenage humour is funny still ......... teacher will be mad if you're late tomorrow!!

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:25 PM
  #77  
Quote: Clearly Pete's mother never brought him up to realise how vulgar it is to continually compare one's financial means with other people. Tacky, very tacky. Definately a lower class upbringing if ever I've seen one!
then when he comes up against someone financially better than him he hasn't got much left has he, oh escept comments about your age then?
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:26 PM
  #78  
Quote: oh escept comments
Spelling tomorrow is it??

Ha Ha Ha

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:26 PM
  #79  
Quote: Hmmmmmm, just what I thought, ahhhhhhhhhh,

Pete
obviously im wasting my time as i can't be bothered to re-edit posts .

an opportunity lost to have a meaningful conversation with you then pete, has anybody ever had one?
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:30 PM
  #80  
Quote: obviously im wasting my time as i can't be bothered to re-edit posts .

an opportunity lost to have a meaningful conversation with you then pete, has anybody ever had one?
Yawn, another one down - superior takes the crown yet again - goodnight I accept your surrender!!

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:31 PM
  #81  
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:32 PM
  #82  
And the winner is ............ as always .......

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:33 PM
  #83  
Quote: Who the hell are these people to make these decisions on my behalf when I have no say who gets appointed to make these decisions for me? Thats why we vote for MP's so they can represent our views. The House of Lords needs removing or at the very least updating with people who are in touch with issues today and not full of dodery old gits who are still living in the early 19th Century!
Understand your point, but since when did your MP or party actually ever listen to the people that put them in power?
Did you vote for war in Iraq?
Did you vote for a raise in Tax?
Did you vote for constant spin?

I think the house of lords should stay, as sometimes they do actually keep the fools ruining (no, its not a typo!) this country in "check".


Voting for Labour is a fools vote. They have had enough time to make a difference. It's time to let the other monkeys back in power. (And thats not the lib dems!)

Buck
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:34 PM
  #84  
Quote: And the winner is ............ as always .......

Pete
let me guess you always like to have the last word , you always have to come first and are never ever wrong
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:36 PM
  #85  
Quote: Voting for Labour is a fools vote. They have had enough time to make a difference. It's time to let the other monkeys back in power. (And thats not the lib dems!)Buck
The TORIES then???

HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR

NO CHANCE!! Memories are too fresh still - remember that the leader of the Tories was the instrumental **** who brought in the POLL TAX!!!

Yeah, whoooopie, lets welcome them back!

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:37 PM
  #86  
Quote: The TORIES then???

HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR

NO CHANCE!! Memories are too fresh still - remember that the leader of the Tories was the instrumental **** who brought in the POLL TAX!!!

Yeah, whoooopie, lets welcome them back!

Pete
who gives a sh[t about the pol tax pete according to you the government could put up taxes 50% and we'd still be better off than we were when the tories were in.


My god pete you are at times ****
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #87  
Quote: The TORIES then???

HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR

NO CHANCE!! Memories are too fresh still - remember that the leader of the Tories was the instrumental **** who brought in the POLL TAX!!!

Yeah, whoooopie, lets welcome them back!

Pete
Always comparing against decades ago.

What's happened in the last abysmal 7 years, muppet?
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:45 PM
  #88  
We have got richer? YES!!

We have better services? YES!!

We see cheaper and cheaper goods? YES!!

We live at a higher standard of living? YES!!

YES, I would say Labour have been TOP NOTCH!!

And WILL walk into power again!

Pete
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:49 PM
  #89  
Quote: We have got richer? YES!!
really have we people can no longer afford to get on the housing ladder!

Quote: We have better services? YES!!
and those services being? the health service? the trains? the government?

Quote: We see cheaper and cheaper goods? YES!!
and that's down to blair and labour is it? NO it's called progress

Quote: We live at a higher standard of living? YES!!
possibly we do again is that down to labour or just natural progress in a developed country

Quote: YES, I would say Labour have been TOP NOTCH!!
errrmm BULL****

Quote: And WILL walk into power again!
unfortunately this point you are probably correct on
Reply 0
Nov 22, 2004 | 11:52 PM
  #90  
We have got richer? YES!!



Some have / some have not





We have better services? YES!!



No, we have more managers then beds, less police on the roads, more speed cameras, crime is increasing.





We see cheaper and cheaper goods? YES!!



Little to do with labour, more to do with increases in technology and manufacturing (manufacturing that does not happen in the UK)





We live at a higher standard of living? YES!!



Some do / some don't





YES, I would say Labour have been TOP NOTCH!!



You would do, your head is so far up his tonyness's 4rse I am surprised you can still type.





And WILL walk into power again!



You'll be lucky to scrap into power.
Reply 0