Excuse me Mr Blair.... did I hear "Sorry"????
13 October 2004, 10:59 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TORQUEamada
I'm just here to dish out some justice to those who are mean to puddy-tats.
13 October 2004, 11:01 PM
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
Not that there is anything you can do to change my feelings towards cat ownership. You are, for all intents and purposes, impotent in that respect.... it must be terribly frustrating for you!
13 October 2004, 11:05 PM
#33
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TORQUEamada
Not as frustrating as having someone elses cat violate your home and garden eh mr a55hole?
Besides, my cat problems have all but been..... how shall we say... Eliminated.
Give us a purrr!
13 October 2004, 11:08 PM
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Victim? No, I train my cats to go and do their business in other people's gardens. If some low life decides to off them then no problem,there is an endless supply of moggies at my local rescue centre.
Be seeing you.
Be seeing you.
13 October 2004, 11:18 PM
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 5,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The psychology of the 'anon' poster quite often results in them posting under their "usual" username in the same thread - an often vain attempt to disassociate themselves with their 'anon' username - ie, if I post as "normal me", no-one will think the anon person can be me.....
13 October 2004, 11:21 PM
#39
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by imlach
The psychology of the 'anon' poster quite often results in them posting under their "usual" username in the same thread - an often vain attempt to disassociate themselves with their 'anon' username - ie, if I post as "normal me", no-one will think the anon person can be me.....
13 October 2004, 11:22 PM
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 5,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
It would be even more ironic if that post was the one pointing out the psychology of such behaviour!
Safe to say, I don't hate you that much ajm
Of course, that could also be seen as another dissasociation
13 October 2004, 11:26 PM
#41
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
Do you think TORQUEamada is ajm ?
I have stated before that I don't use aliases... whether or not you believe that isn't really a concern of mine
Originally Posted by imlach
I did think someone would suggest that as soon as I mentioned it
Safe to say, I don't hate you that much ajm
Of course, that could also be seen as another dissasociation
Safe to say, I don't hate you that much ajm
Of course, that could also be seen as another dissasociation
13 October 2004, 11:30 PM
#42
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
I was having a 'jab' at imlach actually, but you strike me as someone who could effectively argue against himself ...
13 October 2004, 11:31 PM
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 5,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
I was having a 'jab' at imlach actually, but you strike me as someone who could effectively argue against himself ...
14 October 2004, 09:35 AM
#44
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
What are you like
I thought the majority of your posts were made attempting to score points off a teenager
I thought the majority of your posts were made attempting to score points off a teenager
To what teenager do you refer? Surely you didn't fall for that pathetic exit strategy did you? It was an embarrassingly poor way of throwing in the towel and I think the "teenager" knows it, which is why we are treated to sporadic reappearances as part of his futile attempts to regain self respect.
And while we are on the subject of point scoring Jason, it hasn't escaped my attention that whenever I am participating in one of "these" threads I can be assured that you will be there snapping at my heels like a viper in the grass!
14 October 2004, 10:16 AM
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems to be little point in justifying it all by the removal of SH when he said at the beginning that he was not going to war for the sake of regime change, which is internationally illegal anyway.
Pity about the many thousands of innocent Iraqi lives lost during the war and after on top of the ones murdered by SH, and the destruction of their country which is still happening of course.
I'd prefer to vote for a party which I thought might do some good for the country, not just because I thought they are going to be the winning party!
Les
Pity about the many thousands of innocent Iraqi lives lost during the war and after on top of the ones murdered by SH, and the destruction of their country which is still happening of course.
I'd prefer to vote for a party which I thought might do some good for the country, not just because I thought they are going to be the winning party!
Les
Last edited by Leslie; 14 October 2004 at 10:18 AM.
14 October 2004, 10:53 AM
#49
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol thought this might be a serious political thread, wooops
Happy posting ajm, I think I could make an educated guess as to who
your new 'fanboy' is
Bet he doesnt even own a cat, or a villa in France
Happy posting ajm, I think I could make an educated guess as to who
your new 'fanboy' is
Bet he doesnt even own a cat, or a villa in France
14 October 2004, 10:57 AM
#50
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jye
lol thought this might be a serious political thread, wooops
Happy posting ajm, I think I could make an educated guess as to who
your new 'fanboy' is
Bet he doesnt even own a cat, or a villa in France
Happy posting ajm, I think I could make an educated guess as to who
your new 'fanboy' is
Bet he doesnt even own a cat, or a villa in France
LOL!
14 October 2004, 11:09 AM
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sith
People mention Trolls and up pops PSLewis spouting ****............Don't think we need Derek Acohra to solve that one.
14 October 2004, 12:06 PM
#52
Scooby Regular
TORQUEamada, one would have thought that, had you done your homework properly, you would know that gutter level communication is of no interest to me and is certainly of little consequence to me. So when you are done with your feeble, tiresome insults I *may* take the time to address your obvious "issues".
Anyway.....Blair should apologise only for following Bush so blindly, but any actions against SH were surely justified (irrespective of finding any WMD) and long overdue. Obviously sad to see so many civilian and Armed Forces casualties (as in any war).
14 October 2004, 12:32 PM
#53
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jack City
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The NL line is that they will only apologise for the intelligence being wrong.
The intelligence services said information on Iraq was "patchy" and "limited" -"We have little intelligence on Iraq's chemical and biological weapons doctrine and know little about Iraq's chemical and biological weapons work since late 1998".
Dr Spin said, "<the intelligence service> has established beyond doubt that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons".
The intelligence was not wrong, there is no need to apologise for that. It's Blair that needs to apologise for lying. This venture was planned ages back and the whole WMD saga was a con.
The intelligence services said information on Iraq was "patchy" and "limited" -"We have little intelligence on Iraq's chemical and biological weapons doctrine and know little about Iraq's chemical and biological weapons work since late 1998".
Dr Spin said, "<the intelligence service> has established beyond doubt that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons".
The intelligence was not wrong, there is no need to apologise for that. It's Blair that needs to apologise for lying. This venture was planned ages back and the whole WMD saga was a con.
14 October 2004, 12:54 PM
#55
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SiPie
But yet you've solely managed to turn this into 3 pages... you sure like bait
And yes, I do like bait, because if the trap is harmless then bait is little more than free food, is it not?
14 October 2004, 01:00 PM
#56
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsm1
The NL line is that they will only apologise for the intelligence being wrong.
The intelligence services said information on Iraq was "patchy" and "limited" -"We have little intelligence on Iraq's chemical and biological weapons doctrine and know little about Iraq's chemical and biological weapons work since late 1998".
Dr Spin said, "<the intelligence service> has established beyond doubt that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons".
The intelligence was not wrong, there is no need to apologise for that. It's Blair that needs to apologise for lying. This venture was planned ages back and the whole WMD saga was a con.
The intelligence services said information on Iraq was "patchy" and "limited" -"We have little intelligence on Iraq's chemical and biological weapons doctrine and know little about Iraq's chemical and biological weapons work since late 1998".
Dr Spin said, "<the intelligence service> has established beyond doubt that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons".
The intelligence was not wrong, there is no need to apologise for that. It's Blair that needs to apologise for lying. This venture was planned ages back and the whole WMD saga was a con.
14 October 2004, 02:19 PM
#60
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: I am lost. I have gone to find myself, if I should return before I get back, please ask me to wait.
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A spokesman for United States president George W. Bush and British
Prime Minister Tony Blair has moved to sort out a mass media misunderstanding on the leaders both calling inquiries into their flawed intelligence.
"The media all over the world seems to believe that the inquiries will
be into intelligence information Mr Blair and Mr Bush were given before
committing their countries to attack Iraq," the spokesman said.
"But that is not the case at all. The inquiries will be into the ACTUAL INTELLIGENCE of the two men. With elections coming up in both countries, we want to clear doubts about their mental capacity to lead once and for all. Are they nuts or what?
"We still believe that weapons of mass destruction might perhaps be
found in Iraq at some point in the future, possibly by archeologists digging in the next millennium, but we feel we have a duty to find some public servant scapegoats for the whole mess, declare both leaders mentally highly intelligent and get on with getting them re-elected so they can try to do better in their next terms.
"And if they fail our IQ tests, lose the trivial pursuit game and fare
badly in The Price Is Right, well, I envisage them co-authoring a new
book, How To Run A Country For Dummies."
Prime Minister Tony Blair has moved to sort out a mass media misunderstanding on the leaders both calling inquiries into their flawed intelligence.
"The media all over the world seems to believe that the inquiries will
be into intelligence information Mr Blair and Mr Bush were given before
committing their countries to attack Iraq," the spokesman said.
"But that is not the case at all. The inquiries will be into the ACTUAL INTELLIGENCE of the two men. With elections coming up in both countries, we want to clear doubts about their mental capacity to lead once and for all. Are they nuts or what?
"We still believe that weapons of mass destruction might perhaps be
found in Iraq at some point in the future, possibly by archeologists digging in the next millennium, but we feel we have a duty to find some public servant scapegoats for the whole mess, declare both leaders mentally highly intelligent and get on with getting them re-elected so they can try to do better in their next terms.
"And if they fail our IQ tests, lose the trivial pursuit game and fare
badly in The Price Is Right, well, I envisage them co-authoring a new
book, How To Run A Country For Dummies."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
