Police Violence on the BBC news.
#31
Originally Posted by unclebuck
When similar social injustices were committed, yes.
I understood that the Third Way would eliminate all such poor decision making. How wrong I was.
UB
I understood that the Third Way would eliminate all such poor decision making. How wrong I was.
UB
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dull White BMW
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by thecirsch
So........ SOME people turn up with smoke bombs and industrial size bird scarers (bangers) and throw them at Police lines.
And these people wanted a peaceful demonstration.
Silly me
And these people wanted a peaceful demonstration.
Silly me
Steve
#33
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh FFS, It was hardly a peaceful protest, was it?
Typical behavior of many of those in favour of this abhorrent sport.
What did they expect?
Yes the police appear to have been heavy handed, but what would you do faced with a line of baton wielding police with riot gear?
Goad them? Throw smoke bombs and bangers? I doubt it.
Yet another example of a complete lack of respect for authority. This is a democracy, subject to laws and governance.
Mob rule never works, and cannot be allowed to.
Got what they deserved for their general behavior imo.
D
Typical behavior of many of those in favour of this abhorrent sport.
What did they expect?
Yes the police appear to have been heavy handed, but what would you do faced with a line of baton wielding police with riot gear?
Goad them? Throw smoke bombs and bangers? I doubt it.
Yet another example of a complete lack of respect for authority. This is a democracy, subject to laws and governance.
Mob rule never works, and cannot be allowed to.
Got what they deserved for their general behavior imo.
D
#34
Originally Posted by Diablo
Oh FFS, It was hardly a peaceful protest, was it?
Typical behavior of many of those in favour of this abhorrent sport.
What did they expect?
Yes the police appear to have been heavy handed, but what would you do faced with a line of baton wielding police with riot gear?
Goad them? Throw smoke bombs and bangers? I doubt it.
Yet another example of a complete lack of respect for authority. This is a democracy, subject to laws and governance.
Mob rule never works, and cannot be allowed to.
Got what they deserved for their general behavior imo.
D
Typical behavior of many of those in favour of this abhorrent sport.
What did they expect?
Yes the police appear to have been heavy handed, but what would you do faced with a line of baton wielding police with riot gear?
Goad them? Throw smoke bombs and bangers? I doubt it.
Yet another example of a complete lack of respect for authority. This is a democracy, subject to laws and governance.
Mob rule never works, and cannot be allowed to.
Got what they deserved for their general behavior imo.
D
#35
It was oibvious there was going to be trouble form the off.
But what were the police supposed to do? Turn up as Darth Vader clones from the start, and it's police brutality. Stand there behind the lines, and watch as the barriers were pulled down, and they look like muppets.
Yes, there were probably some heavy-handed police officers, and for that there can be no excuse. But then if you dish it out, you have to take it. Many of the pro-hunting people are also those who believe in corporal punishment for children, the return of the death penalty, and the return of the days when the local bobby used to give you a thick ear.
Well, they can see for themselves now the ugly side of policing - this is what the miners went through in the 1980s, and it's not pleasant.
But although I was very much pro-miners, I was never anti-police. They're people doing a job, and the job is to make sure the protesters don't get through. As the protesters increase the violence, the police do the same. It's not subtle, it's not pretty, but it happens.
As for the idiots who stormed the chamber ... an Old Etonian, Brian Ferry's son, a few other assorted toffs ..... they've just GUARANTEED that the Lords opposition will be massively weakened. Good call, guys - you've just shot your own fox.
But what were the police supposed to do? Turn up as Darth Vader clones from the start, and it's police brutality. Stand there behind the lines, and watch as the barriers were pulled down, and they look like muppets.
Yes, there were probably some heavy-handed police officers, and for that there can be no excuse. But then if you dish it out, you have to take it. Many of the pro-hunting people are also those who believe in corporal punishment for children, the return of the death penalty, and the return of the days when the local bobby used to give you a thick ear.
Well, they can see for themselves now the ugly side of policing - this is what the miners went through in the 1980s, and it's not pleasant.
But although I was very much pro-miners, I was never anti-police. They're people doing a job, and the job is to make sure the protesters don't get through. As the protesters increase the violence, the police do the same. It's not subtle, it's not pretty, but it happens.
As for the idiots who stormed the chamber ... an Old Etonian, Brian Ferry's son, a few other assorted toffs ..... they've just GUARANTEED that the Lords opposition will be massively weakened. Good call, guys - you've just shot your own fox.
#38
I liked the statement from one of the protestors interviewed live on SKY News. He was an ex member of the Royal Marines and he was asked what would he do if he lost his job as a result of the ban on hunting. His answer was that he would most likely be out of work, unless someone wanted to pay him to be a hitman to take out Blair, which he said he'd enjoy doing! I wish they'd published his name and address, he'd have had loads of takers, and we could have kept the poor chap in a job :-)
#39
Originally Posted by the moose
As for the idiots who stormed the chamber ... an Old Etonian, Brian Ferry's son, a few other assorted toffs ..... they've just GUARANTEED that the Lords opposition will be massively weakened. Good call, guys - you've just shot your own fox.
the lord's opposition ihas nothing to do with it, as this bunch of c**k's that are supposedly a democratic government, are pushing it through as if they were dictators....I say it's about time this bunch of labour, chav worshipping, illegal immigrant rewarding, dole encouraging prats went and died in a corner somewhere!!!
#40
Originally Posted by Kyl3cook
the lord's opposition ihas nothing to do with it, as this bunch of c**k's that are supposedly a democratic government, are pushing it through as if they were dictators....I say it's about time this bunch of labour, chav worshipping, illegal immigrant rewarding, dole encouraging prats went and died in a corner somewhere!!!
This was in a Labour manifesto, and whether you like it or not, the Labour Party got a truckoad more MPs than the Conservative Party.
So let's see if I understand it - the people were offered the choice of which party they wanted, they selected the Labour Party, and now they are making good on their promise to the people. Sounds pretty democratic to me.
I could undertsand your point if they'd been elected, then decided to use their majority to change their plans radically and instead of banning fox-hunting, they decided to3, say, ban Jewish people, as Hitler did. An undemocratic act carried out by a democratically elected goverment is still undemocratic. But this government's actions are, in this case, entirely democratic, and your argument falls.
#41
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kyl3cook
the lord's opposition ihas nothing to do with it, as this bunch of c**k's that are supposedly a democratic government, are pushing it through as if they were dictators....I say it's about time this bunch of labour, chav worshipping, illegal immigrant rewarding, dole encouraging prats went and died in a corner somewhere!!!
#42
Originally Posted by the moose
Do you understand democracy?
This was in a Labour manifesto, and whether you like it or not, the Labour Party got a truckoad more MPs than the Conservative Party.
So let's see if I understand it - the people were offered the choice of which party they wanted, they selected the Labour Party, and now they are making good on their promise to the people. Sounds pretty democratic to me.
I could undertsand your point if they'd been elected, then decided to use their majority to change their plans radically and instead of banning fox-hunting, they decided to3, say, ban Jewish people, as Hitler did. An undemocratic act carried out by a democratically elected goverment is still undemocratic. But this government's actions are, in this case, entirely democratic, and your argument falls.
This was in a Labour manifesto, and whether you like it or not, the Labour Party got a truckoad more MPs than the Conservative Party.
So let's see if I understand it - the people were offered the choice of which party they wanted, they selected the Labour Party, and now they are making good on their promise to the people. Sounds pretty democratic to me.
I could undertsand your point if they'd been elected, then decided to use their majority to change their plans radically and instead of banning fox-hunting, they decided to3, say, ban Jewish people, as Hitler did. An undemocratic act carried out by a democratically elected goverment is still undemocratic. But this government's actions are, in this case, entirely democratic, and your argument falls.
#43
Originally Posted by the moose
Do you understand democracy?
This was in a Labour manifesto, and whether you like it or not, the Labour Party got a truckoad more MPs than the Conservative Party.
So let's see if I understand it - the people were offered the choice of which party they wanted, they selected the Labour Party, and now they are making good on their promise to the people. Sounds pretty democratic to me.
I could undertsand your point if they'd been elected, then decided to use their majority to change their plans radically and instead of banning fox-hunting, they decided to3, say, ban Jewish people, as Hitler did. An undemocratic act carried out by a democratically elected goverment is still undemocratic. But this government's actions are, in this case, entirely democratic, and your argument falls.
This was in a Labour manifesto, and whether you like it or not, the Labour Party got a truckoad more MPs than the Conservative Party.
So let's see if I understand it - the people were offered the choice of which party they wanted, they selected the Labour Party, and now they are making good on their promise to the people. Sounds pretty democratic to me.
I could undertsand your point if they'd been elected, then decided to use their majority to change their plans radically and instead of banning fox-hunting, they decided to3, say, ban Jewish people, as Hitler did. An undemocratic act carried out by a democratically elected goverment is still undemocratic. But this government's actions are, in this case, entirely democratic, and your argument falls.
#45
Originally Posted by Kyl3cook
I'm afraid not, because this, albeit a little less serious, is similar to Hitlers dictatorship....the government are making decision which are being voted for by MP's who had, at the time of election, not battered an eyelid over fox hunting...and were instead pushing for a single currency...now they have changed their tactics AFTER ELECTION, so in fact people voted for a government which had a different stance. This is in my books, an outrage, and anyone with any pride in their country, should vote against these bunch of muppets!
It was in the manifesto. We voted for it. They're enacting legislation. The government are doing what we asked them to, and you'd quite rightly criticize them if they didn't.
If you don't like it, vote for someone else next time.
#46
Originally Posted by the moose
Representative democracy means electing people (representatives) to make decisions for you and to carry out your wishes. The authority to do this comes from the promises made in their manifesto, despite the fact that very few voters ever bother to read these.
It was in the manifesto. We voted for it. They're enacting legislation. The government are doing what we asked them to, and you'd quite rightly criticize them if they didn't.
If you don't like it, vote for someone else next time.
It was in the manifesto. We voted for it. They're enacting legislation. The government are doing what we asked them to, and you'd quite rightly criticize them if they didn't.
If you don't like it, vote for someone else next time.
#47
Originally Posted by Kyl3cook
I will, and I did last time....they have wandered well off course in their manifesto, which was questionable to begin with...how anyone cn see that this government is doing even a half decent job is beyond me...look at the state of the country when they came into power, and look at it now! they have ruined our once proud nation!
And let's have some specifics, none of your "ooh, they give benefits to foreigners". You clearly have very definite views of precisely how this country has been ruined, so why not share them?
#48
Scooby Regular
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3661332.stm
Hmmm... Let's face it, the protesters look really peaceful in this picture ........ not
Hmmm... Let's face it, the protesters look really peaceful in this picture ........ not
#49
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kyl3cook
I will, and I did last time....they have wandered well off course in their manifesto, which was questionable to begin with...how anyone cn see that this government is doing even a half decent job is beyond me...look at the state of the country when they came into power, and look at it now! they have ruined our once proud nation!
The problems with this country run a lot deeper than the last seven years (although this government has contributed to them to a certain level in the same way their predecessors did) and thinking that any political party has what it takes to sort it out just by being voted in is a nonsense.
Come to think of it do you write for the Daily Mail?
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SiPie
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3661332.stm
Hmmm... Let's face it, the protesters look really peaceful in this picture ........ not
Hmmm... Let's face it, the protesters look really peaceful in this picture ........ not
People at the front were being pushed forward by the increasing size of the crowd and as they were pushed forward the police were smashing them in the head with batons. There was nowhere they could go, they had to stand there and be brutalised.
Check out this dangerous looking thug in his pullover, how dare he hold the policeman's baton back, he should just stand there and have his scalp cleaved open.
Its disgraceful.
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
Yeah, just look at the evil girls in this picture trying to assault the police
People at the front were being pushed forward by the increasing size of the crowd and as they were pushed forward the police were smashing them in the head with batons. There was nowhere they could go, they had to stand there and be brutalised.
Check out this dangerous looking thug in his pullover, how dare he hold the policeman's baton back, he should just stand there and have his scalp cleaved open.
Its disgraceful.
People at the front were being pushed forward by the increasing size of the crowd and as they were pushed forward the police were smashing them in the head with batons. There was nowhere they could go, they had to stand there and be brutalised.
Check out this dangerous looking thug in his pullover, how dare he hold the policeman's baton back, he should just stand there and have his scalp cleaved open.
Its disgraceful.
I agree - diablolical dress sense Should have been shot, not batonned !
On a more serious note, I see no one in your pictures getting hit by the police....
#52
Originally Posted by the moose
Senior, I'm SPEECHLESS. We're in total agreement on this!
It's called progress. lol. Innevitable we'd see eye to eye on something.
<raises beer and say's cheers Moose>
#53
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diablo
I agree - diablolical dress sense Should have been shot, not batonned !
Its rather unfortunate, but on closer inspection I think what I originally thought was a baton might in fact be a hunting horn! Ooops!
On a more serious note, I see no one in your pictures getting hit by the police....
#54
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, I saw the news, and I saw a number of agressive and unruly demonstrators getting the kicking they deserved.
I did not see anyone who was simply minding theor own peaceful business getting hit.
I did not see anyone who was simply minding theor own peaceful business getting hit.
#55
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diablo
No, I saw the news, and I saw a number of agressive and unruly demonstrators getting the kicking they deserved.
If you or I did that to someone else with the same weapon, even in self defense, we'd go to prison for it.
It amazes me that the anti's can be disgusted by violence against a fox and yet sneer in delight as people get their heads split open.
#56
Originally Posted by ajm
So that poor girl deserved a baton in the face for trying to get out the way did she? You may not agree with what the people were protesting about but surely you shouldn't wish those sort of injuries on unarmed people? Yes they were angry, yes they were pushing (and being pushed) but surely a more appropriate response to that is to push back, not belt someone round the head with a metal bar.
If you or I did that to someone else with the same weapon, even in self defense, we'd go to prison for it.
It amazes me that the anti's can be disgusted by violence against a fox and yet sneer in delight as people get their heads split open.
If you or I did that to someone else with the same weapon, even in self defense, we'd go to prison for it.
It amazes me that the anti's can be disgusted by violence against a fox and yet sneer in delight as people get their heads split open.
Police cannot be infallible.....just as long as they are accountable and offer a simple apology.
It's the tosser protestors fault in the first place for even being there. They should f$ck off and get a life, making careful note to not tread on any ants on the way home.
#57
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I honestly think that these jokers have completely lost touch with reality.
The right to kill a fox is worth fighting the police and storming parliament for?
They need to get some sense of perspective and get a grip. According to the CA, they've had a whole range of moans about farmers and the way the government treats the countryside, so why is it that this one issue about killing animals for fun has them frothing at the mouth and completely losing the plot, crying like some baby that's had it's dummy taken away? Grown adults screaming and bawling about their "right" to chase foxes. It was embarassing to watch.
Go drag hunting. The fox is out of the equation and everyone's happy. No jobs lost, no hounds destroyed etc. Sorted.
They seem so full of themselves that they're totally agasht that an elected government can dare to do anything that they don't agree with. I really hope the law comes down like a ton of bricks on those clowns yesterday who seem to think that a government elected by the people can be bullied and hysterically shouted at by selfish dolts expressing a minority opinion. I'm sick of listening to their nonsense. What are our democratic processes coming to if people are allowed to do that? If trying to bully the constitution is the tactic the CA are adopting, I think the next time they turn up with their silly T-shirts and placards, the police should just steam in and start liberally applying some serious baton.
The right to kill a fox is worth fighting the police and storming parliament for?
They need to get some sense of perspective and get a grip. According to the CA, they've had a whole range of moans about farmers and the way the government treats the countryside, so why is it that this one issue about killing animals for fun has them frothing at the mouth and completely losing the plot, crying like some baby that's had it's dummy taken away? Grown adults screaming and bawling about their "right" to chase foxes. It was embarassing to watch.
Go drag hunting. The fox is out of the equation and everyone's happy. No jobs lost, no hounds destroyed etc. Sorted.
They seem so full of themselves that they're totally agasht that an elected government can dare to do anything that they don't agree with. I really hope the law comes down like a ton of bricks on those clowns yesterday who seem to think that a government elected by the people can be bullied and hysterically shouted at by selfish dolts expressing a minority opinion. I'm sick of listening to their nonsense. What are our democratic processes coming to if people are allowed to do that? If trying to bully the constitution is the tactic the CA are adopting, I think the next time they turn up with their silly T-shirts and placards, the police should just steam in and start liberally applying some serious baton.
#58
Originally Posted by popeye
I honestly think that these jokers have completely lost touch with reality.
The right to kill a fox is worth fighting the police and storming parliament for?
They need to get some sense of perspective and get a grip. According to the CA, they've had a whole range of moans about farmers and the way the government treats the countryside, so why is it that this one issue about killing animals for fun has them frothing at the mouth and completely losing the plot, crying like some baby that's had it's dummy taken away? Grown adults screaming and bawling about their "right" to chase foxes. It was embarassing to watch.
Go drag hunting. The fox is out of the equation and everyone's happy. No jobs lost, no hounds destroyed etc. Sorted.
They seem so full of themselves that they're totally agasht that an elected government can dare to do anything that they don't agree with. I really hope the law comes down like a ton of bricks on those clowns yesterday who seem to think that a government elected by the people can be bullied and hysterically shouted at by selfish dolts expressing a minority opinion. I'm sick of listening to their nonsense. What are our democratic processes coming to if people are allowed to do that? If trying to bully the constitution is the tactic the CA are adopting, I think the next time they turn up with their silly T-shirts and placards, the police should just steam in and start liberally applying some serious baton.
The right to kill a fox is worth fighting the police and storming parliament for?
They need to get some sense of perspective and get a grip. According to the CA, they've had a whole range of moans about farmers and the way the government treats the countryside, so why is it that this one issue about killing animals for fun has them frothing at the mouth and completely losing the plot, crying like some baby that's had it's dummy taken away? Grown adults screaming and bawling about their "right" to chase foxes. It was embarassing to watch.
Go drag hunting. The fox is out of the equation and everyone's happy. No jobs lost, no hounds destroyed etc. Sorted.
They seem so full of themselves that they're totally agasht that an elected government can dare to do anything that they don't agree with. I really hope the law comes down like a ton of bricks on those clowns yesterday who seem to think that a government elected by the people can be bullied and hysterically shouted at by selfish dolts expressing a minority opinion. I'm sick of listening to their nonsense. What are our democratic processes coming to if people are allowed to do that? If trying to bully the constitution is the tactic the CA are adopting, I think the next time they turn up with their silly T-shirts and placards, the police should just steam in and start liberally applying some serious baton.
Foxes are cuddley....hence the protest. You don't see them protesting at Tesco for selling wasp/fly killer spray do you.
"Yeah but its only a wasp......."
......and what's the difference between a fox and a wasp?? One's cuddley, one isn't. People have nothing better to do.
Urban people trying to tell rural people how to run their lives.
#59
Scooby Regular
Check out this dangerous looking thug in his pullover, how dare he hold the policeman's baton back, he should just stand there and have his scalp cleaved open.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/...front300245.jpg
Its disgraceful.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/...front300245.jpg
Its disgraceful.
Have a closer look
#60
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Foxes are cuddley....hence the protest. You don't see them protesting at Tesco for selling wasp/fly killer spray do you.
Another fox-hunting dork with no grip on reality.
Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Urban people trying to tell rural people how to run their lives.