Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related
View Poll Results: Should cats owners be responsible for their cat's actions?
Yes
53.85%
No
46.15%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll

Should cat owners be legally responsible for thier pets actions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 June 2004, 12:35 PM
  #151  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jye
I think what this thread really shows, even though you find it so hard to believe, is that you and OllyK, and perhaps Tel, are the only ones on SN atm who share the same opinions regarding cat ownership
A lot of people do just roll over about it, because they realise that the chances of getting anything changed legally are minimal at best. I'm no cat hater, but i'd like them a whole lot more if they stayed out of my garden.
TelBoy is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 12:37 PM
  #152  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah I'm sure theres lots of stuff we would all like to change Tel, its all about being realistic though. Take my giraffe Tyson, he hates his lead, just hates it
Jye is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 12:37 PM
  #153  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

it's pity you find the vote hard to take in
Hmmm, 40 votes out of 542 on-line members. LOL
ALi-B is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 12:38 PM
  #154  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
AJM and OllyK you really do take the award for the most ridiculous discussions I have ever seen on this forum.
Why thank you!

Bird **** is well known to potentially carry very harmfull bacteria, as does fox ****. I tell you what while your so upset about animals poohing in your garden why don't you add all species of wildlife to your campaign
As I have already said, birds and foxes are not the product of someone elses actions. I have to put up with them, I do not have to put up withthe actions of other people.

The easy answer here is to totally enclose your garden
Or for you to keep control of your pet.


What makes me laugh on this as well is that you seem to think that if the garden is clear from animal droppings its going to be perfectly safe for babies/children to play on You think that beacause there is no animal **** on your garden there arnt plenty of harmful germs and bacteria just sitting in the earth?
Where has anyone said this??? And if you want to play trump cards on knowledge of microbiology then by all means go ahead!

LOL you really do want to wake up and realise your argument is nothing less than pathetic
You havn't earned the right to call anyone's argument pathetic yet.
ajm is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 12:39 PM
  #155  
K9VYN
Scooby Regular
 
K9VYN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The infamous 'Subaru Impreza Story' DVD Motor!
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
For the purposes of this debate you are going to have to accept that I have had paw marks on my car with associated claw scratches and I have excrement in the grass. If I didn't I wouldn't be participating in this debate.

If you want me to take your point of view seriously you are going to have to cease being so presumtious as to tell me what damage I have and havn't had.

The health issues are well documented. Look them up. If you have any further questions then come back to me.
as a cat owner (well 2 cats), i feel your pain - put Pug in garage one night as it was loaded for a car boot sale the next day, left Scooby out! next day i found paw prints and and a scratch on Scoob's n/s rear qtr.

i'm pretty certain it was my neighbour's cat as i've chased it off the roof of the Pug a few times (little **** was trying to climb in the sunroof yesterday avo). i've also had to clean up loads excrement, which again i'm pretty certain isn't limited to my cats alone.

its ******* annoying - i know, but its what they do. if we decided not to keep cats as pets they'd be ferral, but still **** on your lawn, scratch your car and be more likely to cause harm to children/adults because they are wild/de-humanised (new for the Oxford English Dictionary?).

i'm sure if you have evidence that someone's cat is causing damage, then you can bring a case against the owner... forcing them to take more control of their pet (in a fair and humane manner of course) - treating a specific case individually is perhaps the way to deal with it rather than generalising.
K9VYN is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 12:44 PM
  #156  
Muffleman
Scooby Regular
 
Muffleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whenever I'm working on the engine, or polishing the car, one of my cats will always keep me company, walking round the engine bay, disappearing down the sunroof, etc Makes me smile every time. Yet I've not got one scratch on the bodywork !

I've no idea why, maybe you've got lard-**** moggies with un-trimmed claws where you live.

But my cats seem to have no problem in jumping on\off my car without writing it off.



Matt
Muffleman is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 12:44 PM
  #157  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

(little **** was trying to climb in the sunroof yesterday avo)
Have you by per chance seen the Ford Sportka advert??

LOL@google ad:

Soft Paws / Claws $14.99
Soft Claws nail caps for cats. Low Price & In Stock Guarantee!
Might solve the problem of scratches on the paint
ALi-B is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 12:48 PM
  #158  
K9VYN
Scooby Regular
 
K9VYN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The infamous 'Subaru Impreza Story' DVD Motor!
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
Have you by per chance seen the Ford Sportka advert??

LOL@google ad:



Might solve the problem of scratches on the paint
ALi-B

yeah...


muffleman,

my cats (in particular the younger one) are the same - always want to be involved in whatever you're doing and they admittedly don't seem to cause any damage. the neighbour's cat however, is a lard-****!
K9VYN is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 12:49 PM
  #159  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by juan
Maybe it was another creature that shat on your lawn then?

Did the paw prints wash off?
The paw prints washed off, the scratches remained, unsurprisingly.

I can't take it too seriously because I get this feeling that even if your house fell down there would be some cat related reason for it
There you are being presumptuous again. Although if that ever did happen and a cat was to blame rest assured you would all know about it!
ajm is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 12:57 PM
  #161  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i know, but its what they do. if we decided not to keep cats as pets they'd be ferral
Why would there be any more ferral cats if people kept control of thier cats, which is what we are asking. If we ban cats completely that's a different issue, but the current domesticated (or wild if you prefer some people's theory that cats are wild and "not owned") batch would be put down, not set free. I am not suggesting that, don't think anybody else is, just that the owners of every other kind of pet take a degree of responsibility for their pet:
1 - dog owners clear up after thier dogs and keep them on leads to avoid them killing things.
2 - horse owners keep them in fields and muck out their stables
3 - bird owners keep their birds in cages and clean them out
4 - rodent owners keep their rats / guniea pigs/ rabbits in hutches cages and clean them out
5 - reptile owners keep their pets in appropriate cages / tanks with heating etc and clean them out.

Cat owners - chuck their pets outside to fend for themseleves, at risk of being run over by cars, getting attacked by foxes or other cats and to crap on other people's property and then get upset when people complain about it and claim their pet is so special to them and yet they put it at risk every time they let it out, makes no sense to me.
OllyK is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:01 PM
  #162  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

very small minority of people who hate cats
Why do people keep assuming I hate cats??? I don't, I quite like them in their place, but I do "hate" irresponsible cat owners, there is a difference.
OllyK is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:01 PM
  #163  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lets get this in perspective. At no point did I say that this issue is more or less important than any other issue affecting the world we live in. We started this thread to debate one specific subject:

"Should cat owners be responsible for their cat's actions?"

Posts should be either arguing for or against this specific question. Arguing what birds, dogs and foxes do is irrelevant to the debate, as is whether or not we should even be having this debate in favour of other issues.

It is a subject that affects me personally, and it is also a subject about which I know a lot, hence I am here in the thick of it instead of doing my work!
ajm is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:05 PM
  #164  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

The fact is a cat is not an animal that can be kept in doors with out being cruel to it (denying it its natural desire to roam).
I'm sure if you kicked a dog out...it would assume it's "natural desire to roam." Same with birds.
I'm sure if you let your ginea pig or hamster out it's cage it would resume it's natural instintcs and roam about.

What's the difference?

You saying it's not cruel to deny a dog or other housepets it's natural instincts but it's cruel to do it to a cat?

Yeah...whatever
ALi-B is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:11 PM
  #166  
Oatcake
Scooby Regular
 
Oatcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just like to add my two penny worth if possible, I haven't read all the posts so if I've missed some important points feel free to point them out to me.

Here goes (flame suit on)

I have two cats and they NEVER go outside. Cat owners who let their cats go out are as far as I'm concerned irresponsible lazy barstewards, with no respect for their cats or other peoples property. There is no need for a cat to go outside, my two cats are 8 years old now and have every thing they require INSIDE the house. Every person who comes to my house comments on what lovely contented cats they are.

I also have a dog, 12 fish and 16 birds as pets, should I also turf these out of the house every morning when I go to work as well as my cats?

I am lucky that I can pop home at dinner time when I'm working and spend a bit of time with my pets, but those that say its cruel to lock pets up for 10 hours a day while they are at work, I agree with you, but there is a simple answer, DONT HAVE PETS.

I also get p*ssed off by other peoples cats who let them out all day and night, I'm sick off their cats sh*tting all over MY lawn, walking all over MY cars and worrying MY birds outside in MY avairy, which is situated in MY garden.

let the flames begin! lol

oatcake
Oatcake is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:11 PM
  #167  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, for the first time the Yes's have taken the lead! Are people realising that taking responsibility for their own pet isn't such an unreasonable request afterall?

It seems I am no longer a minority!
ajm is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:13 PM
  #168  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Posts should be either arguing for or against this specific question. Arguing what birds, dogs and foxes do is irrelevant to the debate, as is whether or not we should even be having this debate in favour of other issues.
But people have, many have commented that while owners do take a degree of responsibility for their pet (getting their cats neutered, feeding them well and regularly, playing with them and giving them toys and catnip to keep them occupied etc) but that you cannot keep a cat locked up or put it on a lead. Both you and Olly think that you can keep them indoors and put them on a lead and so there the debate ends.

BTW I phoned our local vet and asked him about keeping cats indoors and he said that while it is possible with some cats it all depends on the cat, many will be OK but others can become overweight (not usual for cats), can become withdrawn, may start to pace and become restless, and become aggressive to other cats in the household, or even spray around the house.

In essence he stated that cats naturally prefer to roam freely, to climb, jump, run etc.
Jye is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:13 PM
  #169  
ProperCharlie
Scooby Regular
 
ProperCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

maybe we should create two separate (but equal ) societies. one could be in the frozen **** end of the country, and the other in the inhabitable part. one will have cats roaming freely, and the other will have no cats. some geezer called hadrian will be contracted to build a big wall to keep the cats out of our part. we will see which society develops more successfully over the next 10 millennia.

ProperCharlie is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:14 PM
  #170  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well said Oatcake - shame there are not more like you about !!
OllyK is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:15 PM
  #171  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well done Oatcake, precisely the sort of input and perspective this thread needed! You have a veritable zoo's worth of animals there, I don't envy your food bill!
ajm is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:17 PM
  #172  
K9VYN
Scooby Regular
 
K9VYN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The infamous 'Subaru Impreza Story' DVD Motor!
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

K9VYN is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:18 PM
  #173  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
A cat can not be caged without being cruel to it.
If big cats such as Lions and Tigers can be kept in a cage, I am damn sure your moggie can.

You can not train a cat to be walked on a lead like a dog, they are not as domesticated as a dog and will not obey orders like a dog.
Cobblers, people just can't be bothered to train cats (or take responsibility for them it would seem). They are intelligent creatures and it is perfectly feasible to train them using food as an incentive, exactly the same as a dog. Did you see the "Intelleginet Pets" program on the BBC?? A woman had trained her cat to sit next to her and press the keys on the piano. A cats natural curiosity is actually and advantage to training it and if it knows it will be rewarded then it learns to repeat the behaviour.
OllyK is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:18 PM
  #174  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jye
But people have, many have commented that while owners do take a degree of responsibility for their pet (getting their cats neutered, feeding them well and regularly, playing with them and giving them toys and catnip to keep them occupied etc) but that you cannot keep a cat locked up or put it on a lead. Both you and Olly think that you can keep them indoors and put them on a lead and so there the debate ends.

BTW I phoned our local vet and asked him about keeping cats indoors and he said that while it is possible with some cats it all depends on the cat, many will be OK but others can become overweight (not usual for cats), can become withdrawn, may start to pace and become restless, and become aggressive to other cats in the household, or even spray around the house.

In essence he stated that cats naturally prefer to roam freely, to climb, jump, run etc.
Jye, the point we are trying to make is that IF a particular animal cannot be controlled without it suffering then that animal is not a suitable pet full stop.
ajm is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:20 PM
  #175  
K9VYN
Scooby Regular
 
K9VYN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The infamous 'Subaru Impreza Story' DVD Motor!
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oatcake
Just like to add my two penny worth if possible, I haven't read all the posts so if I've missed some important points feel free to point them out to me.

Here goes (flame suit on)

I have two cats and they NEVER go outside. Cat owners who let their cats go out are as far as I'm concerned irresponsible lazy barstewards, with no respect for their cats or other peoples property. There is no need for a cat to go outside, my two cats are 8 years old now and have every thing they require INSIDE the house. Every person who comes to my house comments on what lovely contented cats they are.

oatcake
my cats are lovely, contented and well looked after! they usually get to go out when they want to! os what makes your cats better than mine?
K9VYN is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:21 PM
  #176  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In essence he stated that cats naturally prefer to roam freely, to climb, jump, run etc.
And I am sure my dog would as well, and I would prefer to have my garden cat crap free and the plants un-damaged by digging. Your point is what exactly?
OllyK is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:22 PM
  #177  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K9VYN
my cats are lovely, contented and well looked after! they usually get to go out when they want to! os what makes your cats better than mine?
The simple fact that they are not in danger of being run over or able to damage other people's property or crap on it. That makes them emminently superior.
OllyK is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:25 PM
  #178  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K9VYN
my cats are lovely, contented and well looked after! they usually get to go out when they want to! os what makes your cats better than mine?
This doesn't make his cats better, it makes him a more responsible owner than you. The cats are well looked after, safe from harm outside and do not inflict any misery on his neighbours.
ajm is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:26 PM
  #179  
Oatcake
Scooby Regular
 
Oatcake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bravo2zero,

Sorry m8 but I've never heard such crap in my life.
Keeping a cat inside and never letting it out is not caging it and its not cruel, ask a vet.
A cat can be trained to walk on a lead.
A cat can be trained to use a litter tray inside the house.
A cat can be trained to respond to command from its owner, just like a dog.

How do I know the above? I know because MY two cats do all the above.

Like I've said before cat owners who turf their cats out when they go to work, go to bed are just lazy.

If any cat owner wants their cats to do any of the above, like my cats do, simply spent time with the cat and train it like you would a dog. You only get out what YOU put in.

oatcake
Oatcake is offline  
Old 21 June 2004, 01:26 PM
  #180  
K9VYN
Scooby Regular
 
K9VYN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The infamous 'Subaru Impreza Story' DVD Motor!
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
This doesn't make his cats better, it makes him a more responsible owner than you. The cats are well looked after, safe from harm outside and do not inflict any misery on his neighbours.
hey... that was gonna be my response!
K9VYN is offline  


Quick Reply: Should cat owners be legally responsible for thier pets actions?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 PM.