View Poll Results: Should cats owners be responsible for their cat's actions?
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll
Should cat owners be legally responsible for thier pets actions?
#91
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you let any person roam through your garden, juan, seeing how therapeutic it is?
Bob, i do accept it. I have to. I can't reverse people's decision to attempt to domesticate cats. All i'm saying is that it isn't just a one-way street with them - some people don't appreciate them, but can do nothing about it short of extreme measures.
Bob, i do accept it. I have to. I can't reverse people's decision to attempt to domesticate cats. All i'm saying is that it isn't just a one-way street with them - some people don't appreciate them, but can do nothing about it short of extreme measures.
Last edited by TelBoy; 21 June 2004 at 11:36 AM.
#92
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by **************
You lot are being pathetic on this
Do you moan about all the other animals that roam into your gardens and take a dump? Believe me fox and bird mess for example will have as many if not more diseases in their cr@p than cats mess. Do you go round demanding someone else picks up any fox droppings or go round washing bird cr@p off your lawns?
Do you moan about all the other animals that roam into your gardens and take a dump? Believe me fox and bird mess for example will have as many if not more diseases in their cr@p than cats mess. Do you go round demanding someone else picks up any fox droppings or go round washing bird cr@p off your lawns?
Grow up ffs. Cats are not a dog, they can not generally be treated the same as a dog like taken for a walk. If you want to try putting a cat on a lead then be my guest, I tried it once with my old cat when it was a kitten to take it round the garden and it went ******* mental
Cats do a very good job as far as I am concerned, they kill mice...
and rats which carry disease
Not too keen seeign them kill their prey or have it deposited on the door step but its what a cat does and what you accept as its owner.
A cat has a territory
and needs to be let outdoors for excersise as much as anything but also tyo hunt.
My sister keeps indoor cats and in my opinion its very wrong to keep them locked up.
Dogs have been domesticated not to hunt anymore, cats have not been domesticated to that degree,
they are still very much wild animals
in that respect and will catch their own food to survive.
For those saying about locking cats up, walking cats on a lead etc you have no idea wtf you are talking about
#93
So you let any person roam through your garden, juan, seeing how therapeutic it is?
As a race we can impose our own laws on each other but sometimes imposing them on other creatures shouldn't be our right.
#94
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The infamous 'Subaru Impreza Story' DVD Motor!
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
The thing is, without labouring the point (although i feel i already have), all the others you mention are utterly natural. What i and some others are suffering here is a result of a conscious decision of somebody else to own a cat as a pet, one whose instinct is to keep its own "patch" spotless, but not its neighbours'. But in answer to the question; no, bird and or/fox mess doesn't cause any significant problem to me at least.
we are all quick to generalise when something causes us an issue without considering that something that is non-problematic to us could be an issue to someone else! i sincerely hope my cats don't cause people to get as upset as some people on this board.
in the cat's defense, i would argue that many parents don't stop their teenagers from smashing windows/bus shelters, defacing signs, stealing cars, being genrally abusive, dropping litter, making racist comments, spawning more children and brining them up in exactly the same way etc - how is this more socially acceptable behaviour than a cat's?
Last edited by K9VYN; 21 June 2004 at 11:40 AM.
#95
OllyK I think you will find that bird faeces is pretty potent, probably more so than a cat.
It has been proved that it contains a number of very harmful pathogens that can be transmitted to man.
It has been proved that it contains a number of very harmful pathogens that can be transmitted to man.
Last edited by juan; 21 June 2004 at 11:44 AM.
#96
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just because you can't be bothered to spend the time training the cat to accept a lead (for goodness sake we even trained the g/f's rabbit to walk on a lead, if a rabbit can learn, I am damn sure a cat can)
#97
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by K9VYN
in the cat's defense, i would argue that many parents don't stop their teenages from smashing windows/bus shelters, defacing signs, stealing cars, being genrally abusive, dropping litter, making racist comments, spawning more children and brining them up in exactly the same way etc - how is this more socially acceptable behaviour than a cat's?
It isn't K9VYN, but drawing this sort of comparison is meaningless, in my opinion. There's no Cat Prison is there? That's the point - we're totally at the mercy of the cat owners who, at the end of the day, can just say "Tough". And generally, they do. Because they can.
#98
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OllyK I think you will find that bird faeces is pretty potent, probably more so than a cat.
#100
As for training a cat to be llike a dog, whats the point. Why try and break an animals spirit. That is a VERY selfish attitude.
Might just as well get a dog
A cat is a free spirit and it can choose to co-habit with you. It can look after itself. Its life doesn't revolve around you and it doesn't need to have you in visual contact 24 hours a day to be happy. Why try to make it something its not? Typical selfish human attitude
Might just as well get a dog
A cat is a free spirit and it can choose to co-habit with you. It can look after itself. Its life doesn't revolve around you and it doesn't need to have you in visual contact 24 hours a day to be happy. Why try to make it something its not? Typical selfish human attitude
Last edited by juan; 21 June 2004 at 11:47 AM.
#101
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jye
How amazingly stupid Olly. You might as well compare a cat to a tortoise m8. And you talk about my arguement being full of holes!!!!!! ROFPML
#102
Originally Posted by OllyK
It is not an major issue to train a cat to walk on a lead if you start when it is a kitten.
So we should try and screw up another species just because you found some unknown turd in your garden and you can't deal with it.
#103
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jye
Just leave it on your car paintwork for more than 2 seconds to test that theory
#104
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The infamous 'Subaru Impreza Story' DVD Motor!
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
It isn't K9VYN, but drawing this sort of comparison is meaningless, in my opinion. There's no Cat Prison is there? That's the point - we're totally at the mercy of the cat owners who, at the end of the day, can just say "Tough". And generally, they do. Because they can.
but what i am saying is that i find problem teenagers an annoyance/issue which IMO the government/parents don't or haven't dealt with in the same way that cat owners (myself included) may, and not deliberately of course, contribute to your annoyance.
i'm just trying to see where there is a greater point to this thread, other than a rant because a cat(s) keeps depositing in some gardens. unpleasant as it may be (and i'm sure lots of us have to deal with it) there's is little we can do to please all parties.
#105
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the cat fouling and owner responsibility front, I'd be happy to lay down a challenge to both ajm and OllyK.
I will go for a walk and take pictures of dog ****e and stray dogs in my local area. You both can go and look in your gardens for cat crap (as this seems to be where all the cat ****e in the world lives), and dead birds and all these dead 'nearly extinct' voles, and we will host the proof on photobucket tommorow. I bet I can get at least 20 stray dogs and their corresponding **** from any one housing scheme alone.
Q all the 'its only chav dog owners who let their animals do that', comments LOL
I will go for a walk and take pictures of dog ****e and stray dogs in my local area. You both can go and look in your gardens for cat crap (as this seems to be where all the cat ****e in the world lives), and dead birds and all these dead 'nearly extinct' voles, and we will host the proof on photobucket tommorow. I bet I can get at least 20 stray dogs and their corresponding **** from any one housing scheme alone.
Q all the 'its only chav dog owners who let their animals do that', comments LOL
#106
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Right, a good time to answer off a few points:-
1) If an animal cannot be confined to your own house and grounds then it is not a suitable pet. The very fact that you are not in control of the animal is stretching the definition of a pet.
2) Many people do keep cats under control/indoors. If you can't then you shouldn't be keeping one as a pet.
3) With regard to our various gripes, the fact that some of you don't have a problem is irrelevent to those of us who do! It doesn't negate the fact that a problem exists. Your actions are causing people material loss, we have a right to live without your actions causing us material loss.
4) Arguing about damage caused by indigenous wildlife is irelevent. We have to put up with that because it doesn't happen through the direct actions of another person.
1) If an animal cannot be confined to your own house and grounds then it is not a suitable pet. The very fact that you are not in control of the animal is stretching the definition of a pet.
2) Many people do keep cats under control/indoors. If you can't then you shouldn't be keeping one as a pet.
3) With regard to our various gripes, the fact that some of you don't have a problem is irrelevent to those of us who do! It doesn't negate the fact that a problem exists. Your actions are causing people material loss, we have a right to live without your actions causing us material loss.
4) Arguing about damage caused by indigenous wildlife is irelevent. We have to put up with that because it doesn't happen through the direct actions of another person.
#107
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's nothing to do with the bacteria and other pathogens in it
Perhaps you could then pass the info onto ajm for his thesis
#108
Originally Posted by OllyK
I think you will find that bird guano is in general not that much of a health risk
Originally Posted by OllyK
That's nothing to do with the bacteria and other pathogens in it
If thats your definition of not much of a health risk then what do you deem to be present in cat poo to be such a ghastly problem? some kind of radioactive material?
#109
Originally Posted by ajm
I would like to add that the proposed law would include clarification of the term domestic pet when applied to cats, ie. it should be classified as a domestic pet and controlled as such otherwise it would constitute a non indigenous animal that has been released to roam which is already illegal.
And as for those that say that owners should clear up after their cat....
Yeah, I can really see my non-cat owning neighbours allowing me into their garden, armed with a shovel and digging up borders to see if my cat has shat in them. Assuming that it’s my cat of course, or should they allow, all the cat owners in my road access into their gardens too?
#110
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by juan
OllyK I think you will find that bird faeces is pretty potent, probably more so than a cat.
It has been proved that it contains a number of very harmful pathogens that can be transmitted to man.
It has been proved that it contains a number of very harmful pathogens that can be transmitted to man.
1) risk of salmonella - only felt to be an issue if they crap in water tanks in sufficient quantity.
2) Aspergillus spp Spores - commonly found in our domestic environment and they are not considered to present an unacceptable risk
3) Also they can, in domestic situation pick up some human infections and then pass them back to the owner, but this is not a likelyhood with wild birds.
In comparison to a parasite that affects brain function, I am not seeing too much of a risk here.
#111
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by K9VYN
i'm just trying to see where there is a greater point to this thread, other than a rant because a cat(s) keeps depositing in some gardens. unpleasant as it may be (and i'm sure lots of us have to deal with it) there's is little we can do to please all parties.
#112
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jye
On the cat fouling and owner responsibility front, I'd be happy to lay down a challenge to both ajm and OllyK.
I will go for a walk and take pictures of dog ****e and stray dogs in my local area. You both can go and look in your gardens for cat crap (as this seems to be where all the cat ****e in the world lives), and dead birds and all these dead 'nearly extinct' voles, and we will host the proof on photobucket tommorow. I bet I can get at least 20 stray dogs and their corresponding **** from any one housing scheme alone.
Q all the 'its only chav dog owners who let their animals do that', comments LOL
I will go for a walk and take pictures of dog ****e and stray dogs in my local area. You both can go and look in your gardens for cat crap (as this seems to be where all the cat ****e in the world lives), and dead birds and all these dead 'nearly extinct' voles, and we will host the proof on photobucket tommorow. I bet I can get at least 20 stray dogs and their corresponding **** from any one housing scheme alone.
Q all the 'its only chav dog owners who let their animals do that', comments LOL
Dog faeces seems more prevalent that cat's because dogs are controlled within certain areas. It is therefore likely that their excrement will lie around those areas (pavements etc.). I agree that it is not pleasant, but it isn't relevant to the arguement against cats. There are 10 million odd cats in the UK and they must be pooing somewhere! If its not along pavements then it must be on private property, hence this discussion!
#113
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1) If an animal cannot be confined to your own house and grounds then it is not a suitable pet. The very fact that you are not in control of the animal is stretching the definition of a pet.
2) Many people do keep cats under control/indoors. If you can't then you shouldn't be keeping one as a pet.
3) With regard to our various gripes, the fact that some of you don't have a problem is irrelevent to those of us who do! It doesn't negate the fact that a problem exists. Your actions are causing people material loss, we have a right to live without your actions causing us material loss.
4) Arguing about damage caused by indigenous wildlife is irelevent. We have to put up with that because it doesn't happen through the direct actions of another person.
#114
Originally Posted by ajm
Right, a good time to answer off a few points:-
1) If an animal cannot be confined to your own house and grounds then it is not a suitable pet. The very fact that you are not in control of the animal is stretching the definition of a pet.
1) If an animal cannot be confined to your own house and grounds then it is not a suitable pet. The very fact that you are not in control of the animal is stretching the definition of a pet.
2) Many people do keep cats under control/indoors. If you can't then you shouldn't be keeping one as a pet.
3) With regard to our various gripes, the fact that some of you don't have a problem is irrelevent to those of us who do! It doesn't negate the fact that a problem exists. Your actions are causing people material loss, we have a right to live without your actions causing us material loss.
4) Arguing about damage caused by indigenous wildlife is irelevent. We have to put up with that because it doesn't happen through the direct actions of another person.
What an absolute crock of the proverbial. I can't believe you can even wheel this stuff out and hope it to be taken seriously
#115
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redkop
Yeah, I can really see my non-cat owning neighbours allowing me into their garden, armed with a shovel and digging up borders to see if my cat has shat in them. Assuming that it’s my cat of course, or should they allow, all the cat owners in my road access into their gardens too?
#117
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jye
You can but it's cruel to the animal and its natural instincts to roam freely. Just as it is to keep dogs locked up. Yawn weve been here before me thinks.
Life is full of problems, live with it.
Yeah a bit like the old fox hunting debate. Yawn.
#118
All this pent up rage!
Hope you make it back to the rational world soon.
Meantime just don't go checking your garden for mouse poo or you'll go over the edge.
Mice should really be confined to quarters and only allowed out on leads.
Heck actually lets just get rid of all animals except humans. Then the world will be just rosy and we will have completed our selfish destruction of what nature took millions of years to make.
Hope you make it back to the rational world soon.
Meantime just don't go checking your garden for mouse poo or you'll go over the edge.
Mice should really be confined to quarters and only allowed out on leads.
Heck actually lets just get rid of all animals except humans. Then the world will be just rosy and we will have completed our selfish destruction of what nature took millions of years to make.
Last edited by juan; 21 June 2004 at 12:05 PM.
#119
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To those who have turned up and just posted something like:
"This is bollox"
I'm afraid your opinion counts for nothing unless you can actually put together a comprehensive argument against the facts we have presented.
Those facts are:-
"This is bollox"
I'm afraid your opinion counts for nothing unless you can actually put together a comprehensive argument against the facts we have presented.
Those facts are:-
- Cats cause damage to property
- Cats cause damage to indigenous wildlife
- Cats present a health risk to humans
#120
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sodding Chipbury
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
There are 10 million odd cats in the UK and they must be pooing somewhere! If its not along pavements then it must be on private property, hence this discussion!