Wr1 test in EVO mag
#271
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: EVO X 400/400
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks gm, I knew i could rely on u for an explanation, i was always under the impression it was hardly worth it, cos of the internals being so good on the 2ltr, however now, youve confirmed my confusion lol
Jason
Jason
#272
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Posts: 11,468
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
Originally Posted by T5NYW
And what the Artical missed, was having a MY04STiUKPPP!! IMHO
'UK' or 'Import' that is the real Question which leaves 2 choices
WR1 or STi04PPP
or
Spec "C" or Type25
'UK' or 'Import' that is the real Question which leaves 2 choices
WR1 or STi04PPP
or
Spec "C" or Type25
Originally Posted by Fidd
That is true what you say IMO. Having the P1 there is OK for straightfoward comparison of figures purposes, ...... It would have interesting to have seen a new STi in there in some form or another.
As I said believe it was a missing
If the'd have done a simular test 4 years on the top classic's, the 'New' P1 UK with a STi6JDM type 'R' ( hopefully terminology is OK)
The Type 'R' would have beat the P1 by possibly a greater margin than the WR1 versus Spec 'C'
but there are peeps on here( GM,JF & Chrisp etc) with the exact info, so I wont and even try to remember or guess fiqures
At one stage looked like the UK cars were losing the plot compared to JDM's so is the gap between performance/Ability of JDM & UK cars narrowing ?
IMHO the WR1 is far better value for money versus Type C, than P1Uk was versus STi6JDM Type R IMHO.
Tony
Ps.
My personal preference's would be a UK, WR1 or JDM, Spec C with 2.5Ltr
Last edited by T5NYW; 15 April 2004 at 12:27 PM.
#273
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL I had an insurance quote on a WR1 and it was half the cost of my JDM RA. Trouble is I dont like the colour, shame as it would have saved me 600 a year on insurance . Mind due also had a quote on 996T and that was 300 cheaper than the modded RA
#274
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by T5NYW
Fidd,
As I said believe it was a missing
If the'd have done a simular test 4 years on the top classic's, the 'New' P1 UK with a STi6JDM type 'R' ( hopefully terminology is OK)
The Type 'R' would have beat the P1 by possibly a greater margin than the WR1 versus Spec 'C'
but there are peeps on here( GM,JF & Chrisp etc) with the exact info, so I wont and even try to remember or guess fiqures
At one stage looked like the UK cars were losing the plot compared to JDM's so is the gap between performance/Ability of JDM & UK cars narrowing ?
IMHO the WR1 is far better value for money versus Type C, than P1Uk was versus STi6JDM Type R IMHO.
Tony
Ps.
My personal preference's would be a UK, WR1 or JDM, Spec C with 2.5Ltr
As I said believe it was a missing
If the'd have done a simular test 4 years on the top classic's, the 'New' P1 UK with a STi6JDM type 'R' ( hopefully terminology is OK)
The Type 'R' would have beat the P1 by possibly a greater margin than the WR1 versus Spec 'C'
but there are peeps on here( GM,JF & Chrisp etc) with the exact info, so I wont and even try to remember or guess fiqures
At one stage looked like the UK cars were losing the plot compared to JDM's so is the gap between performance/Ability of JDM & UK cars narrowing ?
IMHO the WR1 is far better value for money versus Type C, than P1Uk was versus STi6JDM Type R IMHO.
Tony
Ps.
My personal preference's would be a UK, WR1 or JDM, Spec C with 2.5Ltr
As was mentioned earlier, most people buying a car wont be convinced by track times made by a nutter in somebody elses car.
Ive never driven a sti6typeR, but i suspect its very similar to the sti5typeR that i owned for 6 months before getting the P1.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post