Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Are the performance figures for ppp relistic ???

Old May 8, 2003 | 12:43 AM
  #31  
( R6 CDW )'s Avatar
( R6 CDW )
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Post

Please accept my apolligy.

[Edited by ChrisB - 5/8/2003 1:51:54 PM]

[Edited by ( R6 CDW ) - 5/8/2003 4:56:37 PM]
Reply
Old May 8, 2003 | 12:38 PM
  #32  
Steve777's Avatar
Steve777
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
From: www.m-soc.com
Post

This was a good thread started and ahaving input from Mike Wood of Prodrive. The tone has now lowered with the last comment started by the thread originator !

Just think about what you have just written because you didn't like a previous opinion. You did have Mike on here. What do you think he would now think.

We want the likes of Mike on here regularly and so we should all act responsibily using the english language in the manner it was mean't

Think about it

Say what you like back but I have made my point
Reply
Old May 8, 2003 | 03:39 PM
  #33  
( R6 CDW )'s Avatar
( R6 CDW )
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Post

Point taken, and humble pie eaten in a suitible amount.

chris
Reply
Old May 8, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #34  
wrx bill's Avatar
wrx bill
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
From: erm erm erm well it does lots to the gallon but it aint a scoob doh
Post

not saying its a bad thread i think its fair question, but i do get a bit fed up with people on here putting some types of scoobys down and the 'mines better than yours thing'. i personally think the performance figures of the PPP are realistic and having PPP on your car would make it a better alround car to drive than just giving it better drag strip speed. sorry if i offended you in any way that wasnt my intention.
Reply
Old May 8, 2003 | 10:39 PM
  #35  
( R6 CDW )'s Avatar
( R6 CDW )
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Post

No probs bill, Lets call it freinds and continue in a nice constuctive thread.

cheers

chris
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 02:05 AM
  #36  
( R6 CDW )'s Avatar
( R6 CDW )
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Post

think i'v blown it!!!!!
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 09:38 AM
  #37  
wrx bill's Avatar
wrx bill
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
From: erm erm erm well it does lots to the gallon but it aint a scoob doh
Post

tops
i know i didnt help matters by my stupid off the cuff coment done in a moment of temporary madness. mike wood please come back to this thread as you input is vital
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 09:30 AM
  #38  
urban's Avatar
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,566
Likes: 1
From: Never you mind
Post

Diablo

Yes, the STI is gutless below 4K in non PPP trim, hence the 5.something 0-60 time.

However in PPP trim its definately not gutless, hence the 4.6 0-60 time.

Having not driven a WRX PPP, I reckon that there's probably not that much difference between it and the STI PPP in gears 1,2 & 3, but the STI is a different animal in gears 4,5 & 6, and I reckon that it would be a different ball game between the pair here.

My opinion only.


Shaun



[Edited by urban - 5/7/2003 9:31:58 AM]
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
48
Jul 21, 2017 09:50 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
Oct 20, 2015 04:32 PM
FuZzBoM
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
16
Oct 4, 2015 09:49 PM
InTurbo
ScoobyNet General
21
Sep 30, 2015 08:59 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:23 AM.